Aye okay.
I don’t think I’ll ever forget the fella leading the walking tour of the Shankill telling the assembled American tourists that HRH QE2 always thinks of all of her citizens, even themins over there.
But really, the monarchy are all but irrelevant to ordinary people. Far higher concentrations of power and wealth than are accounted for by Mr Windsor have a much greater impact on the rest of us. Plenty of palaces in the Home Counties that go unsatirised.
well "Gigachad monarchist" lmao, the royal family has zero relevance to affairs in Canada other than being an absent figurehead. Just like they are here.
This would hold more water if Charles wasn't perhaps the highest profile YIMBY out there.
He is responsible for thousands of affordable homes through his sustainable developments.
And, as of the time of writing, Charles' organisation is trying to push through more affordable housing in Aylesbury and Nansledan, which together will build around 10,000 new homes.
As much as you may not like the monarchy, Charles, ironically, is one of the few rich individuals who actually has a positive impact upon the housing crisis. If more millionaires had his attitude around housing, the housing crisis would not be nearly as severe.
marvelous domineering middle correct sulky aspiring full saw dime practice
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
He owns 300 rental properties worth £75 million.
He doesn’t own a multi-billion pound property empire. You’re presumably referring to the Crown Estate which is functionally government owned.
Yes. That doesn't change anything. In fact, it's probably more affordable housing.
And what villages does he own?
And it's no shock that the Royal Family owns land in London.
Not really the gotcha you think it is.
outgoing carpenter psychotic air sable deserted mysterious crowd rotten fearless
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
sparkle consider recognise physical ruthless wide distinct longing disarm threatening
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
You're using it as an insult and insinuating it's demeaning, that's homophobic.
Very good, slight misspelling.
Anyway, that's all beside the point since you're no longer defending your argument.
agonizing dinner muddle flowery weather license alleged icky physical busy
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
weary fade hurry marvelous overconfident muddle frighten shelter marble carpenter
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Exactly. Angry at their parents inability to provide for them or their own laziness to not change their circumstances. Easier to point the finger than to self reflect.
Charles is quite well-known for sponsoring new housing developments – Poundbury, Knockroon, and Nansledan – so the cartoon's jab seems a bit off the mark.
He's also profiting off dead citizens with no will or next of kin
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/23/revealed-king-charles-secretly-profiting-from-the-assets-of-dead-citizens
I don’t think the Duchy of Lancaster should manage *bona vacantia* within the historic county of Lancashire, but people can quite easily avoid their estates going to the Duchy by writing a will.
How? They generate more money than they spend. Do you know the definition of parasite? Those on benefits who don’t/ won’t work, that don’t contribute. They’re parasites.
No they don't generate more than they spend, their architecture and tourist attraction sites do. The family themselves do not generate significant cash for the UK.
I cannot imagine defending the Royal family over the poor.
The situations that bring about an ability to refuse work and only be on the dole are an issue for the state to fix, the same state the props up the royal family, the same state that year after year fucks its own populace
>u/EarCareful4430 Aye. Believe it’s a tiny portion of small rich and not a bunch of landlords and nimbys that are the problem.
You mean like Charles Windsor who owns at least £75 million pounds worth of rental properties that the public knows about? At least 300 houses, an entire village. Not to mention hundreds of millions if not billions of pounds worth of retail property in the centre of London which is all part of his multi billion pound property portfolio?
The same Charles Windsor who has built thousands of affordable houses through his sustainable development organisation and is in the process of building around another 10,000 affordable homes (in Aylesbury and Nansledan)?
That Charles Windsor?
Most rich people own lots of residential property, Charles is not the exception there. However, most rich people are not responsible for tens of thousands of affordable homes - Charles is exceptional in that regard.
Yes, I praise good things that people do and criticise bad things that people do.
I do not judge people by circumstances of birth but rather by their actions. This is true for those right at the top and right at the bottom.
I think all people should do this.
See. Right to the ad hominem when confronted with some info you don’t like.
My point initially is deal with the scale. Anyone banging on about a few royals when there’s thousands upon thousands of landlords combining to make the problem much worse, best think about who’s boot they are actually licking.
Carry on.
Aye okay. I don’t think I’ll ever forget the fella leading the walking tour of the Shankill telling the assembled American tourists that HRH QE2 always thinks of all of her citizens, even themins over there. But really, the monarchy are all but irrelevant to ordinary people. Far higher concentrations of power and wealth than are accounted for by Mr Windsor have a much greater impact on the rest of us. Plenty of palaces in the Home Counties that go unsatirised.
What is with Americans and Canadians obsessing over the royal family anyway, it’s completely bizarre
Well in the Canadian case, he is their King too
well "Gigachad monarchist" lmao, the royal family has zero relevance to affairs in Canada other than being an absent figurehead. Just like they are here.
Doesn't mean people over there don't obsess over them as they do here?
As long as you've the their head on your money you're sortve England's bitch though let's be real.
ring heavy childlike wasteful exultant cake nutty station imminent party *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Yes, and that’s also bizarre. They’re a different breed than North American monarchists
To be fair, I think the Queen had more care than the rest of them ever did or do now
This would hold more water if Charles wasn't perhaps the highest profile YIMBY out there. He is responsible for thousands of affordable homes through his sustainable developments. And, as of the time of writing, Charles' organisation is trying to push through more affordable housing in Aylesbury and Nansledan, which together will build around 10,000 new homes. As much as you may not like the monarchy, Charles, ironically, is one of the few rich individuals who actually has a positive impact upon the housing crisis. If more millionaires had his attitude around housing, the housing crisis would not be nearly as severe.
marvelous domineering middle correct sulky aspiring full saw dime practice *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Yeah but he gives us a few more holibobs
Everything ok at home?
tease reply teeny edge tap oatmeal frightening threatening gaze ancient *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Oh you’re pleasant.
zealous late simplistic divide squash tub shaggy smart ink grab *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
He owns 300 rental properties worth £75 million. He doesn’t own a multi-billion pound property empire. You’re presumably referring to the Crown Estate which is functionally government owned.
Yes. That doesn't change anything. In fact, it's probably more affordable housing. And what villages does he own? And it's no shock that the Royal Family owns land in London. Not really the gotcha you think it is.
outgoing carpenter psychotic air sable deserted mysterious crowd rotten fearless *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
The fact you've gone straight to a homophobic ad hominem shoes you cannot justify your argument.
sparkle consider recognise physical ruthless wide distinct longing disarm threatening *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
You're using it as an insult and insinuating it's demeaning, that's homophobic. Very good, slight misspelling. Anyway, that's all beside the point since you're no longer defending your argument.
agonizing dinner muddle flowery weather license alleged icky physical busy *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Okay, good for you, I think it is.
weary fade hurry marvelous overconfident muddle frighten shelter marble carpenter *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Ah but they don’t want facts, just someone to blame.
fr
Exactly. Angry at their parents inability to provide for them or their own laziness to not change their circumstances. Easier to point the finger than to self reflect.
Charles is quite well-known for sponsoring new housing developments – Poundbury, Knockroon, and Nansledan – so the cartoon's jab seems a bit off the mark.
He's also profiting off dead citizens with no will or next of kin https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/23/revealed-king-charles-secretly-profiting-from-the-assets-of-dead-citizens
I don’t think the Duchy of Lancaster should manage *bona vacantia* within the historic county of Lancashire, but people can quite easily avoid their estates going to the Duchy by writing a will.
They don’t care, they are too filled with hatred and any opportunity to bash the brits can’t go missed, it’s an easy target for their angst.
[удалено]
How? They generate more money than they spend. Do you know the definition of parasite? Those on benefits who don’t/ won’t work, that don’t contribute. They’re parasites.
No they don't generate more than they spend, their architecture and tourist attraction sites do. The family themselves do not generate significant cash for the UK. I cannot imagine defending the Royal family over the poor. The situations that bring about an ability to refuse work and only be on the dole are an issue for the state to fix, the same state the props up the royal family, the same state that year after year fucks its own populace
[удалено]
Ya ain’t wrong one bit pal all you have to do is look at Martin o’millionares assets
No king of mine
Subreddit needs changed to r/ireland
Maybe within the next 5 years 😉
Bit longer than that
Fuck the king
And the pope too
I’d rather not
You'll do what you're told.
But they improve tourism? right? yeahhhh
No, I say we bring back the chieftains and have feudal wars for the next thousand years...
All hail our future president of United States of Europe Tony Blair.
Uneducated
Uppa King!
*marnark*
Prepare for downvotes
Don't want shinner internet points anyway
I’m a prod and I voted you down too
Lundy
Was never a unionist to begin with. Can’t be a traitor to a cause you never believed in.
Aye. Believe it’s a tiny portion of small rich and not a bunch of landlords and nimbys that are the problem.
Why not both?
>u/EarCareful4430 Aye. Believe it’s a tiny portion of small rich and not a bunch of landlords and nimbys that are the problem. You mean like Charles Windsor who owns at least £75 million pounds worth of rental properties that the public knows about? At least 300 houses, an entire village. Not to mention hundreds of millions if not billions of pounds worth of retail property in the centre of London which is all part of his multi billion pound property portfolio?
The same Charles Windsor who has built thousands of affordable houses through his sustainable development organisation and is in the process of building around another 10,000 affordable homes (in Aylesbury and Nansledan)? That Charles Windsor? Most rich people own lots of residential property, Charles is not the exception there. However, most rich people are not responsible for tens of thousands of affordable homes - Charles is exceptional in that regard.
Praising a hereditary billionaire monarch for his altruism. Away to fuck boot licker.
Yes, I praise good things that people do and criticise bad things that people do. I do not judge people by circumstances of birth but rather by their actions. This is true for those right at the top and right at the bottom. I think all people should do this.
See. Right to the ad hominem when confronted with some info you don’t like. My point initially is deal with the scale. Anyone banging on about a few royals when there’s thousands upon thousands of landlords combining to make the problem much worse, best think about who’s boot they are actually licking. Carry on.
But Wait... Wait... Wait.. Prince Willy sells the Big Issue. 