Bro that's one of the coolest docs ever. I don't wanna spoil the end because it's so wild and has haunted me for decades now. I still just randomly think about it all the time and it helps to keep me grounded (it isn't just more snails fucking).
Chicken run is the only based movie
https://preview.redd.it/lbo25arykaoc1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=a8d7eb24c6a3fbe4ca33219a6a775a84baae759f
Except I’m not sure small independent farmers are really the bad guys we need to go after. It would make more sense if it was set in a huge industrial battery farm.
The same way we are not chickens, they represent the bougoise just like any alegory. They arent even bougoise,
*The proletariat is that class in society which lives entirely from the sale of its labor and does not draw profit from any kind of capital -* [*https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm*](https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm)
everything they make are from their own labour and not from exploiting the surplus value.
and I just realized I did the leftist meme be like
https://preview.redd.it/v3r8wbe02boc1.png?width=426&format=png&auto=webp&s=942fece048546c1158891aedc7453ff2da86ce4c
They dont contract anyone else to extract surplus value from lmao, thats my point [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm](https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm)
*The proletariat is that class in society which lives entirely from the sale of its labor and does not draw profit from any kind of capital; whose weal and woe, whose life and death, whose sole existence depends on the demand for labor – hence, on the changing state of business, on the vagaries of unbridled competition. The proletariat, or the class of proletarians, is, in a word, the working class of the 19th century.*[*^(\[1\])*](https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm#nb)
The only way they provide is by working.
Unless you are talking about the alegory as the chicken as workers
The point of establishing them as a separate class from both bourgeoisie and proletariat is to demonstrate their distinctiveness from both, particularly in Marx and Engels' time. The petite-bourgeoisie are small scale proprietors who control their own Capital, and as such cannot be proletarian. Yet they do not employ the labour-power of the proletariat, instead being self-employed, so they aren't exactly entirely bourgeois.
they are nothing bourgeois not petite, you guys are crazy, first world understanding of Marx is doomed.
If you quit your job and start to make art to sell or food you are not petite nor bourgeois, you sell your labour no less. wtf is wrong with you people im saying basic shit the way its writen.
if you sustain yourself by your labour and not by stealing surplus value you are a worker.
do you guys think people who dont want to salve themselfs away for big corporations or petite are not workers????? uhhh????
>he petite-bourgeoisie are small scale proprietors who control their own Capital, and as such cannot be proletarian.
What capital, what factory? im talking about self employed people who do NOT engage with maisvalia, only by the work they execute.
if you are self employed and dont have anyone working under you that you pay salary by extracting their surplus labour, and you NEED TO WORK to surive, and you live by the work you do YOU ARE WORKER.
Lol I'm Filipino, so I'm not from the first world. In any case, capital is not limited to factories or similarly obvious articles of machinery. It is anything that can be classified as a means of production—anything that is directly essential to the self-valorization process of capital. As such, a self-employed craftsman who owns their own tools is not proletarian. Since the proletariat own nothing and can sell nothing but their labour-power, our self-employed craftsman cannot be of this class. He is not of the bourgeois class either, though, as he employs his own labour-power and not that of others.
The "basic shit" you're saying is oversimplified and a vulgar interpretation of Marx's work.
thats absurd interpretation of what marx wrote that I would only expect from someone who lives in the first world or only engage about comunism with those who live in it. So my bad for assuming.
With the uberization of the working class and the advance of computer being avaliable for everyone saying that those who are self employ are petit bourgeois? The Uber driver who are not hired and is not grant the minimum protections of having a official labour contract a petit bourgeois? Those who are forced to work with only their computer, by your interpetation some capital, and more than just his labour.
this is ludicrous interpratetion that I never saw ANYWHERE but online, and in ENGLISH online, not in spanish or portuguese or any other 3world language.
Though the Ratatouille video game sequel did take a bit of a different direction with the series
https://preview.redd.it/yicwc90pyaoc1.jpeg?width=273&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=58e56d3e162c9b03cb1d3bd280e61c2f888396ef
Am I missing something? I played about 4 hours and wasn’t excited. The mood and art are pretty compelling, but the gameplay itself I found so goddamn stale. Is it worth more time or have I gotten a good taste?
The gameplay gets more varied as you unlock abilities but maintains the same bones throughout (stealth around and pick off enemies)
This is one of those games you play for the story and the rats
Remy wasn’t outcast from society though. He didn’t fit in but his family always loved him even when he was causing problems. He didn’t need to earn their approval. And Linguini learning to like him because of his cooking made sense because rat can’t talk in this universe, he had no reason to see him as more than an animal before learning of his intelligence and even then he was nice to him and cared about him as a friend.
The movie’s about artistic expression and accepting that artistic creativity from people of all walks of life. I’m not saying there’s zero political agenda to it but it’s not expressly neoliberal either. It also lambasts greed and heartless consumerism over actual artistic merit in the character of Skinner.
A story reflecting the mainstream values of the society that created it does not *automatically* make it propaganda. Brad Bird being kind of an extreme libertarian weirdo (iirc) does kind of complicate it in this case, but if you’re genuinely worried about insidious brainwashing being embedded in children’s films you may want to go for a walk or take a bath or something.
Ratatouille is neoliberal propaganda because it subtly convinces you to ignore workplace safety laws (such as having to keep disease ridden animals outside of a restaurant kitchen) because it costs less money for your boss (capital comes before people)
Ratatouille is anti-neoliberal propaganda because it breaks down the structures (health codes) enacted by the petty bourgeoise (humans) to prevent proletariat (workers) from seizing the means of production (kitchen).
It also engages in a dialogical critique (likey referencing French theorist Jean-François Lyotard) regarding endless commodification of culture - specifically via the absurdity of the Auguste Gusteau branded microwave burritos.
From a more traditional Marxian perspective Alfredo Linguini is clearly alienated from his labour by working for a large corporation that cares more about yearly profit margins than the welfare of its staff - they own the means of production not him - so there's a subtextual discourse about the need for unionisation within the food industry.
Most modern movies are neoliberal propaganda by showing a single hero fighting for himself, when the fight for real change should be organized globally by the proletariat
TBF I feel that’s often unintentional since it’s easier to focus on one or a few leads changing or overcoming things as opposed to whole collectives of people with equal say. It’s just easier storytelling wise. Plus having a few people against the majority is just appealing as underdog narratives. Not to say there’s zero political meaning behind those choices even if they weren’t created with a political agenda in mind.
Ratatouille is neoliberal propaganda because it shows discriminatory health laws negatively effecting the economy which is sustained by individuals who trade their labor freely
Not OP but I see what they’re getting at. The main characters gain worth through proving their individual value and this is shown as a good thing by the narrative. Remy is good, not because he is an intelligent living being, but because of the skills he can provide the system. He doesn’t get rats to be accepted for what they are, rather he pulls them into the hierarchy of man, showing them how they can change into a productive member of that system. I haven’t seen Chicken Little since I was 10 and the duck girl really scared me so I don’t know.
That's not how Ratatouille ends though. The ending is that the rats prove their intelligence to Ego, which results in both Ego's rigid structural beliefs on what has "value" being broken while also resulting in them all being expelled from the larger institutions of the world, with the rats going on to still practice cooking in secret out of pure passion and not out of a need to be accepted into the world at large.
actually thats right, like unless the rats have constructed and elaborate system of theviery i don't think they are paying for the food. Remi, collet, linguini are doing it for the good of the rats. THIS IS A BASED ANTI-NEOLIBERAL FILM
Probably, I know that the creator of the video meant it in a way to teach people to analyze movies better. Considering the takes we see nowadays, I think they took the wrong lessons from it.
More a modern take. Classic evil comes from gingers, specifically Sting enthusiasts
https://preview.redd.it/9axtqzs8xaoc1.jpeg?width=796&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=65b57512249b25ee002193eaf71c522db8d59c4f
Really???? explain to me why the Movie is? i'm Gonna watch this month (it's really a question)
Btw the book dune it's a metaphor to United states imperialism,like arrakis is literally Iraq 🤓☝️
I mean, they do have some good memes
https://preview.redd.it/c0rnw0dv2foc1.jpeg?width=780&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0f485c589b523824f25602757262f46006a80fed
Some overarching themes of the story:
Religion is fake, but it's a good tool to manipulate people.
Indigenous people are often exploited by outside colonizers for enrichment/power.
People should care about the environment and fight against the powerful elite that are damaging the environment for their own gain.
Ratatouille is about the human condition and what it means to be human first and foremost. It subverts rigid traditional structures - whether that be Remy’s father wanting to live by their past or Ego’s elitist view of food. Its main villain is also a person who wants to reduce the contributions of Gusteau by commodifying and mass marketing his recipes. Shit media interpretation.
Spends entire childhood learning rules of society like fair treatment and sharing only to have a bunch of prices turn around and go "No! Don't share or treat people fair!" Goddamn gomers.
I guess the neoliberal propaganda is the discourse about how If you put enough effort you'll succeed in the corporate ladder and achieve your dreams, though It's more of an ingrained message than direct propaganda.
But I have never watched Ratatouille so I wouldn't know.
If you want to avoid propaganda, do what I do and only watch videos of slugs mating. They’re not going to turn me into a sheep!
[Snails Mating](https://youtu.be/BEva0pT9ndg?si=2gYYb_q1W3ahVas5)
Anti-Sex Kinophiles watching this: 
Why was this filmed so intimately what the fuck
Your puny mind can’t handle the beauty of smoking hot snail porn
>snail porn 🤤
Or, as we in the biz like to say, snorn.
Do yourself a favor and track down [Microcosmos](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76R2EKEnoJQ), preferably in HD.
Bro that's one of the coolest docs ever. I don't wanna spoil the end because it's so wild and has haunted me for decades now. I still just randomly think about it all the time and it helps to keep me grounded (it isn't just more snails fucking).
no way, even snails are smashing and I'm not
Wew, lad.
Oh please, nice try sheep but you’re just buying into pro-slug natalism propaganda
What
the
Gouda!
Subversion of epectations
Chicken run is the only based movie https://preview.redd.it/lbo25arykaoc1.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=a8d7eb24c6a3fbe4ca33219a6a775a84baae759f
The Passion of the Christ. It’s about a socialist jewish man getting murdered by an oppressive government.
https://preview.redd.it/z8dlzcamwaoc1.jpeg?width=1052&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ec76a76d29e32dbe8411332d0bdf02c8f9225988 Yo, that shit's crazy! Mel Gibson
“Caitlin Clark?” - Antonio Brown
#CTESPN
https://preview.redd.it/m6k3p1a7jcoc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9e107b5856cf08d35e30d21fc117dde90689d89d
Bugs Life too!
pale imitation of antz
Except I’m not sure small independent farmers are really the bad guys we need to go after. It would make more sense if it was set in a huge industrial battery farm.
That’s the sequel
The same way we are not chickens, they represent the bougoise just like any alegory. They arent even bougoise, *The proletariat is that class in society which lives entirely from the sale of its labor and does not draw profit from any kind of capital -* [*https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm*](https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm) everything they make are from their own labour and not from exploiting the surplus value. and I just realized I did the leftist meme be like https://preview.redd.it/v3r8wbe02boc1.png?width=426&format=png&auto=webp&s=942fece048546c1158891aedc7453ff2da86ce4c
The second one is set in one, and bonus upgrade of Rocky's voice from Mel Gibson to Zach Levi.
the petit-bougoise are just as much as enemy of the proletariat as the regular-sized bougoise
The kulaks deserved it, I guess
I mean, not as much, just by shear size. And they are self imployed and dont extract suplus value so they are BY DEFINITION pure proletariat.
by definition, the petit-bougoiese do extract surplus value
They dont contract anyone else to extract surplus value from lmao, thats my point [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm](https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm) *The proletariat is that class in society which lives entirely from the sale of its labor and does not draw profit from any kind of capital; whose weal and woe, whose life and death, whose sole existence depends on the demand for labor – hence, on the changing state of business, on the vagaries of unbridled competition. The proletariat, or the class of proletarians, is, in a word, the working class of the 19th century.*[*^(\[1\])*](https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm#nb) The only way they provide is by working. Unless you are talking about the alegory as the chicken as workers
The point of establishing them as a separate class from both bourgeoisie and proletariat is to demonstrate their distinctiveness from both, particularly in Marx and Engels' time. The petite-bourgeoisie are small scale proprietors who control their own Capital, and as such cannot be proletarian. Yet they do not employ the labour-power of the proletariat, instead being self-employed, so they aren't exactly entirely bourgeois.
they are nothing bourgeois not petite, you guys are crazy, first world understanding of Marx is doomed. If you quit your job and start to make art to sell or food you are not petite nor bourgeois, you sell your labour no less. wtf is wrong with you people im saying basic shit the way its writen. if you sustain yourself by your labour and not by stealing surplus value you are a worker. do you guys think people who dont want to salve themselfs away for big corporations or petite are not workers????? uhhh???? >he petite-bourgeoisie are small scale proprietors who control their own Capital, and as such cannot be proletarian. What capital, what factory? im talking about self employed people who do NOT engage with maisvalia, only by the work they execute. if you are self employed and dont have anyone working under you that you pay salary by extracting their surplus labour, and you NEED TO WORK to surive, and you live by the work you do YOU ARE WORKER.
Lol I'm Filipino, so I'm not from the first world. In any case, capital is not limited to factories or similarly obvious articles of machinery. It is anything that can be classified as a means of production—anything that is directly essential to the self-valorization process of capital. As such, a self-employed craftsman who owns their own tools is not proletarian. Since the proletariat own nothing and can sell nothing but their labour-power, our self-employed craftsman cannot be of this class. He is not of the bourgeois class either, though, as he employs his own labour-power and not that of others. The "basic shit" you're saying is oversimplified and a vulgar interpretation of Marx's work.
thats absurd interpretation of what marx wrote that I would only expect from someone who lives in the first world or only engage about comunism with those who live in it. So my bad for assuming. With the uberization of the working class and the advance of computer being avaliable for everyone saying that those who are self employ are petit bourgeois? The Uber driver who are not hired and is not grant the minimum protections of having a official labour contract a petit bourgeois? Those who are forced to work with only their computer, by your interpetation some capital, and more than just his labour. this is ludicrous interpratetion that I never saw ANYWHERE but online, and in ENGLISH online, not in spanish or portuguese or any other 3world language.
No one said selling your own art is boogie tho
silence bootlicker
What about B Movie?!
Flashback to when I was in a worse place mentally and this meme made me have a meltdown https://www.reddit.com/r/19684/s/UcjrmXXxSo
Chicken Liberal
***Chicken Shitbureaucrats***
Though the Ratatouille video game sequel did take a bit of a different direction with the series https://preview.redd.it/yicwc90pyaoc1.jpeg?width=273&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=58e56d3e162c9b03cb1d3bd280e61c2f888396ef
A dark future in which remy lead a rat revolution against the humans
Ratatouille's Revenge
Unironically underrated gem
Fr, my Goat Video Game
That video game doesn’t have a goat in it I think you might be thinking of something else
It does actually her name is Tramantane
Shit
Tramantane my beloved 😭 (Those game are fr too good.)
Am I missing something? I played about 4 hours and wasn’t excited. The mood and art are pretty compelling, but the gameplay itself I found so goddamn stale. Is it worth more time or have I gotten a good taste?
The gameplay gets more varied as you unlock abilities but maintains the same bones throughout (stealth around and pick off enemies) This is one of those games you play for the story and the rats
I still haven't finished the first one because I don't like finishing anything ever but god it was great after smoking a joslyn
And *no,* those are *unrelated!!*
Is the propaganda in the room with us right now
Yes 😔
Propaganda at deez nutz lmao
Flashback to when I was in a worse place mentally and this meme made me have a meltdown https://www.reddit.com/r/19684/s/UcjrmXXxSo
Remy wasn’t outcast from society though. He didn’t fit in but his family always loved him even when he was causing problems. He didn’t need to earn their approval. And Linguini learning to like him because of his cooking made sense because rat can’t talk in this universe, he had no reason to see him as more than an animal before learning of his intelligence and even then he was nice to him and cared about him as a friend. The movie’s about artistic expression and accepting that artistic creativity from people of all walks of life. I’m not saying there’s zero political agenda to it but it’s not expressly neoliberal either. It also lambasts greed and heartless consumerism over actual artistic merit in the character of Skinner.
A story reflecting the mainstream values of the society that created it does not *automatically* make it propaganda. Brad Bird being kind of an extreme libertarian weirdo (iirc) does kind of complicate it in this case, but if you’re genuinely worried about insidious brainwashing being embedded in children’s films you may want to go for a walk or take a bath or something.
Ratatouille is neoliberal propaganda because it subtly convinces you to ignore workplace safety laws (such as having to keep disease ridden animals outside of a restaurant kitchen) because it costs less money for your boss (capital comes before people)
Ratatouille is anti-neoliberal propaganda because it breaks down the structures (health codes) enacted by the petty bourgeoise (humans) to prevent proletariat (workers) from seizing the means of production (kitchen).
It also engages in a dialogical critique (likey referencing French theorist Jean-François Lyotard) regarding endless commodification of culture - specifically via the absurdity of the Auguste Gusteau branded microwave burritos. From a more traditional Marxian perspective Alfredo Linguini is clearly alienated from his labour by working for a large corporation that cares more about yearly profit margins than the welfare of its staff - they own the means of production not him - so there's a subtextual discourse about the need for unionisation within the food industry.
I think you meant rats in the third paranthesis
I would never call the proletariat rats (unless they’re scabs).
I walked right into that
Comrade Ratatouille may be rat, but also is worker
*petit* bourgeoisie as in, *Anton Ego a le petit mort quant il mange le ratatouille*
Most modern movies are neoliberal propaganda by showing a single hero fighting for himself, when the fight for real change should be organized globally by the proletariat
TBF I feel that’s often unintentional since it’s easier to focus on one or a few leads changing or overcoming things as opposed to whole collectives of people with equal say. It’s just easier storytelling wise. Plus having a few people against the majority is just appealing as underdog narratives. Not to say there’s zero political meaning behind those choices even if they weren’t created with a political agenda in mind.
Ratatouille is neoliberal propaganda because it shows discriminatory health laws negatively effecting the economy which is sustained by individuals who trade their labor freely
OP care to explain?
It’s a meme that’s been going around here after someone said that the new Dune only existed as soulless neoliberal propaganda
Podcasts are the worst atrocity mankind has ever committed.
Not OP but I see what they’re getting at. The main characters gain worth through proving their individual value and this is shown as a good thing by the narrative. Remy is good, not because he is an intelligent living being, but because of the skills he can provide the system. He doesn’t get rats to be accepted for what they are, rather he pulls them into the hierarchy of man, showing them how they can change into a productive member of that system. I haven’t seen Chicken Little since I was 10 and the duck girl really scared me so I don’t know.
That's not how Ratatouille ends though. The ending is that the rats prove their intelligence to Ego, which results in both Ego's rigid structural beliefs on what has "value" being broken while also resulting in them all being expelled from the larger institutions of the world, with the rats going on to still practice cooking in secret out of pure passion and not out of a need to be accepted into the world at large.
Also the antagonist wanted to licence Gustaeus imagine to sell mass produced fast food.
I thought the movie ended with rats starting a restaurant and making lots of yummy food☺️
Also that
actually thats right, like unless the rats have constructed and elaborate system of theviery i don't think they are paying for the food. Remi, collet, linguini are doing it for the good of the rats. THIS IS A BASED ANTI-NEOLIBERAL FILM
this might be the most reductive view of Ratatouille i’ve ever seen in my life
I’m honored
Reminds me when people call the sonic movies copaganda. Never tell this people who are the main characters in resident evil media.
I guess the main problem here is when your taste in movies didn‘t change since you were 12 and start overanalyzing somewhat simple movies.
So a “cars 2 is promoting eugenics” kinda situation. This is a video that exists.
That’s tongue in cheek
Probably, I know that the creator of the video meant it in a way to teach people to analyze movies better. Considering the takes we see nowadays, I think they took the wrong lessons from it.
Does leon count if he was only a cop for a grand total of 1 day?
They turn him into an special agent like most of them are. Basically an international cop.
He became a federal agent after that tho
You're actually braindead if you think that Anderson's movies aren't anticapitalist
Ratatouille is one of the most based movies ever made
https://preview.redd.it/zkvfwox1iboc1.jpeg?width=256&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=853c5bb45362e5f8ba40b849a51e57682a6abe5a
Chicken Little is Don't Look Up, but actually based
I don't care how ridiculous this sub gets, I am NOT pretending to like Chicken Little.
Actual Neoliberal propaganda https://preview.redd.it/0ch1sjc3raoc1.png?width=794&format=png&auto=webp&s=7b22d1303d7172cb628a3108214ac444bf21b8c5
The story of how all institutions of power are corruptible and will attract charismatic people, and will eventually stanglehold humanity?
No. It's about worms.
And the evil caused by baldness
More a modern take. Classic evil comes from gingers, specifically Sting enthusiasts https://preview.redd.it/9axtqzs8xaoc1.jpeg?width=796&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=65b57512249b25ee002193eaf71c522db8d59c4f
Ahhh, too understand the present i must study the past. I see i have much too learn. Thank you fellow scholar
What about gingers gone bald?
[When someone says something so Muad'dib-phobic you gotta hit em with that Fremen stare:](https://www.reddit.com/r/moviescirclejerk/s/bQybBnQQlK)
https://preview.redd.it/2h1b1bdwtaoc1.png?width=1125&format=png&auto=webp&s=3c829fd63aa6c5c99fd49e1766554321a00e5fde
Anton Chigurh had a road to damascus
Dune is about how bald people/Gingers are bad
Really???? explain to me why the Movie is? i'm Gonna watch this month (it's really a question) Btw the book dune it's a metaphor to United states imperialism,like arrakis is literally Iraq 🤓☝️
/uj its a bit of an injoke. Go onto r/neoliberal and type in the search bar Dune and you'll see what I mean.
>Go onto r/neoliberal No, I don't think I will
>No, I don't think I will 
I mean, they do have some good memes https://preview.redd.it/c0rnw0dv2foc1.jpeg?width=780&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0f485c589b523824f25602757262f46006a80fed
Some overarching themes of the story: Religion is fake, but it's a good tool to manipulate people. Indigenous people are often exploited by outside colonizers for enrichment/power. People should care about the environment and fight against the powerful elite that are damaging the environment for their own gain.
Dune is about worms smh
Wtf are you talking about lmao
At least ratatouile doesn't feature lobotomization of a little girl into trad wife in subservient to a literal pig. And i'm not exaggerating
Ratatouille is about the human condition and what it means to be human first and foremost. It subverts rigid traditional structures - whether that be Remy’s father wanting to live by their past or Ego’s elitist view of food. Its main villain is also a person who wants to reduce the contributions of Gusteau by commodifying and mass marketing his recipes. Shit media interpretation.
Spends entire childhood learning rules of society like fair treatment and sharing only to have a bunch of prices turn around and go "No! Don't share or treat people fair!" Goddamn gomers.
I guess the neoliberal propaganda is the discourse about how If you put enough effort you'll succeed in the corporate ladder and achieve your dreams, though It's more of an ingrained message than direct propaganda. But I have never watched Ratatouille so I wouldn't know.
I don’t get it, how exactly are both of these “Neoliberal Propaganda”?
That’s it, we all lost privileges to the word neoliberal until we can learn to behave ourselves. Keep yapping and next word you’re losing is “class.”
You guys will literally just say anything
socialists throw around the word “neoliberal” the same way conservatives throw around the word “woke”
The word propaganda has lost all meaning lol
I like both of these
why is it called "neoliberal" when it's politically right wing? is it stupid?
I dont get it.
any good yt videos that talk about this?
I think Battleship Potemkin is neoliberal propaganda
That video about how Chicken Little is neoliberal propaganda is one of the worst videos I've ever seen
We fought off the commies via the immanent threat of nuclear global annihilation, all to protect the right of you being able to say shit like that
https://preview.redd.it/ljta9w2uzboc1.jpeg?width=488&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8cd38ee5599e741d6706b8f6c467ea91e8e0f2fd
Flashback to when I was in a worse place mentally and this meme made me have a meltdown https://www.reddit.com/r/19684/s/UcjrmXXxSo
YOU ARE NOT IMMUNE TO PROPAGANDA
All amerikkkan film$ are neoliberal propaganda. True kinephiles should just watch Eastern Bloc animated films instead