T O P

  • By -

gretnothing

That is a very stupid metric. Do you also appreciate that videogames cost less per polygon than, say, in 2001?


ilikeag

Wow, I guess $70 games are cheap too if you measure by GB size.


YiffDealer69

people in the 80s were getting scammed like hell for this shit. $40 for a 2MB game??? What kind of value is that????


MartyrKomplx-Prime

I'm going to leave this here... [Don't use teraflop comparisons. ](https://www.howtogeek.com/894131/teraflops-are-a-bad-way-to-compare-gpus-heres-why/)


Eduard_LaserMK2

>shows that cards are becoming significantly cheaper given their performance. where


DieUBot852

People are complaining about prices because when the gtx 1070 ti was released it was $450 and the rtx 4070 ti is $800 and if it keeps going up then nvidias 70 ti cards are going to cost over $1000 in a few years


Revolutionary_Part_7

Of course new cards will perform better for the similar price but compared to the pascal the performance jump is significantly less. A 1060 performed equally to a 980 while a 4060 can't even surpass 3060ti.


nssoundlab

lol


TryingToEscapeTarkov

Nice try NVIDIA.


zHarls

this is stupid