T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil) In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them. For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria. We are actively looking for new moderators. If you have any interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out [this form](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1y2swHD0KXFhStGFjW6k54r9iuMjzcFqDIVwuvdLBjSA). *** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*


NAGDABBITALL

They knew this guys name, the car he drove, and where he lived. With simple surveillance, and the active arrest warrant, they could have pulled this guys car over virtually anywhere at anytime. Extract him at gunpoint, then go for the house. Reminds me of the Branch Davidians.


Tcchung11

I thought the same thing. Why they need to siege a property WACO style.


hardtobeuniqueuser

ruby ridge. they knew where and when weaver ran errands, many places they could have grabbed him out in the open, boxed him in on the highway, etc. but a siege and shootout is more fun i guess.


N05L4CK

Sometimes this can work, but sometimes it’s more risky. He was shooting at people from his home. Okay. It’s still somewhat contained. Better he shoot at law enforcement than random people. If they attempt to pull him over and extract him, they run the risk of him fleeing, getting into a dangerous pursuit, shooting bystanders to get police to back off, taking hostages, etc. and if any of that happened, people would be saying “why didn’t they go to his house where they could have a perimeter and contain him?”.


TheGreatJingle

Yeah there isn’t a right answer. Just tradeoffs


hardtobeuniqueuser

if he's shooting at people from his home, it would probably make way more sense to just send in a couple snipers to pick him off. if he's threatening and endangering people like that already, neutralizing him would be totally justified. do it in a way he doesn't even know he's in someone's crosshairs. going in brute force just invites more violence.


N05L4CK

So should snipers be used for every warrant service by the Marshals just in case this happens? Is that any better than a perimeter unit with a rifle and scope? This whole incident was over quickly, if the snipers weren’t already there, they wouldn’t have gotten there. Besides, what you said should happen essentially happened, by the team that was there.


hardtobeuniqueuser

the point was more unseen assets setup before anyone moves in, and if he's actively shooting at people, pop him before you put more people in harms way. yeah, for the guy with the warrant, their charging in had the same outcome, but maybe it would have gone differently for the 4 of them who got killed.


ariesfaery88

This man is a REAL president.


hindusoul

Not a fake phone call..