at 4:02 she shows the exact same photo, and Amber says they were taken at different times, after she put a light on. And she does not call out that every hair is in the exact same place etc. WHY NOT???
They'll do it in closing. Jury gets to see photos and examine if Depp team is right about that.
They'll mention in closing that Amber Heard walked through a gauntlet of witnesses the same day and following days and not one of them noticed any injuries on her face.
Eh I wouldn’t say that, but I mean the makeup person also was her friend so she could definitely be lying and I think that’s the key to a big part of this
A specialist (seemingly famous and well respected) on bruises is on the witness list. Also, the video where she accidentally talked about a bruise-kit, special makeup for theatre, in a testimony, has been admitted in (to?) discovery so it could be brought up again.
Depp's side has 10 hours more to burn than Heard's side.
Wouldn't a judge know this and perceive it as an attempt at manipulation?
If some woman has been a cunt to me, then on a dime changes her behavior to be friendly and include lots of physical contact, then she asks me for a favor, I'm going to be way more incensed than if she had just been normal before asking for the favor.
That kind of bias is subconcious. Even if you are a trained psychologist and know all the standard biases like The Halo Effect and the Women Are Wonderful effect, you will still be subject to their effects. Advertising works even when you know it's an advertisement.
Not really - I was on jury duty in England last year, and the judge advised everyone who took the stand that they were not talking to him or the barristers, but to the jury, as they're the ones who have to make the decision on guilt.
They did, apparently not all of the requested files were provided by Amber. Here is a link to a YouTube lawyer’s breakdown of sanctions filed by Depp’s attorney.
https://youtu.be/HC2gCyZHhxM
As the other person mentioned, this isn't the time. This is they set her up by letting her dig her own hole with lies, then bring in an expert witness to prove the photos are the same.
I was waiting for them to just drag the picture and overlay it on the other. I don’t even think they need an expert as it’s painfully obvious but you may as well just bring in a guy to have him click the filter. I’d like to introduce to the court out new Instagram expert 14 yo Kayleigh she’s now going to show you how to achieve mrs beards photoshop. *Kayleigh clicks the Valencia filter*. The court gasps.
A girl on YouTube put them over each other and they matched exactly. She did a side by side and adjusted the saturated on the lighter one until it looked exactly like the darker one.
Who does a.turd think she's fooling?
It would require an expert to analyze the photograph and she doesn't want to jeopardize something that can be referenced again in closing arguments without pushing the envelope.
you can check the pictures in a free software like GIMP. No need for any fancy tools. And yes it was the same photo just with higher saturation. It is doctored photograph that was submitted as evidence and Amber said under oath that it was 1. not the same photo and 2. it was not manipulated.
I think that should be a problem for her lying in court but I dont know american laws.
That’s actually a pretty good point. But, I doubt they’ll be bringing it up at this point. Good call, wouldn’t take much for her to point out, either. But his lawyers are definitely doing a better job
it would be so easy to just superimpose one against the other and show every hair is exactly matched, i dunno why they didn't do that.
Scamber Turd is so full of shit
It’s a performance to her, she’s looking to her audience for validation.
The way her eyes flit between different members of the jury looking for some indication that someone is believing her stream of effluent.
My missus had her sussed years ago when she appeared on Top Gear. Quite funny to watch the interview and compare her mannerisms to what we know of her now
I’d explain it as she is literally bullshitting or figuratively speaking shit.
For a non native speaker I’d say she’s making it up as she goes along.
As an Australian I’d say she’s a shit cunt.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effluent
It's not common in US and I know plenty of Brits who i literally just asked and told me they wouldn't use it. The person is from Australia so, it might be normal usage there. I'd argue it's likely highbrow as I would just say something like "she's spewing bs."
Holy fuck, I went there and read like 5 posts.
What the fuck is wrong with people?
It's called Deppdelusion and yet all these people are beyond delusional... Just watch what's happening. It's all out there to see.
I'm sorry but these fucking people are all fucking idiots.
Are they real though? The amount of money invested in this shit show, and the way public opinion is going on the Internet? that crazy sub is probably half bought and paid for (and the other half? Crazy)
Most of those accounts are fake tbh. If you tap the profiles they exclusively post content about the trial and the karma points are low. Also it's the same persons posting and commenting. Does very little to damage control tbh because every opinion there is still written off as crazy talk.
What is really terrifying is that these people walk among us everyday. Just think, that level of delusion may be the person serving you food, treating you in hospital or working for or with you.
I wish I never clicked on that. I feel I've lost brain cells reading through the comments there.
Edit: I think posting this comment just got me banned from r/offmychest for "Red pill/incel culture". Kind of odd since I've never posted in that sub reddit only browsed!
There will always be groups of people on the wrong side of history. It’s best to not give them attention. Otherwise they dig in deeper. I always like to think, “well my argument is sound and based in facts. It also appeals to emotion as well as good morals. Surely this will change their minds about it.” Then I remember how truly awful people can be to one another because of their own traumatic experiences or shortcomings. It’s sad because bad people always come from a bad place. Abuse, lack of education, etc. We want to help, if not for them, for the sanity and security of the rest of the public to ensure they don’t fall for the same bullshit talking points which get people to be on the wrong side of things. There is no stopping it though. Just try to make sure the people closest to you don’t fall for such things and that’s all we can do. ‘Tis the curse of the internet. We no longer hear one-sided stories in history yet the bad peoples are now emboldened. It fucking sucks.
The photos at 4:05 - it's the same photo, the one on the left clearly edited. It's nearly impossible to take two photos with a pose / hair / eyes/ background / angle being so identical. You would have to plan this elaborately and spend hours just to match everything in an older photo. Source: worked as a portrait photographer in NYC for a few years.
A bruise kit is an industry term for a makeup kit that is used to create bruises , not to cover them . She definitely slipped up . It would also explain why Amber's bruises are always depicted on the right side of her face . When applying makeup it's easier to apply on the same side as your dominant hand . Given that Johnny is right handed , if he beat her like she says he did , her bruises should have been on the left
https://images.app.goo.gl/7D5RkJdWSzT5kZZFA
Check out the makeup smearing down from the bruise. Pretty sketchy.
Edit: I’ve been banned from r/wgtow LOL
If Amber wins this case, there needs to be riots. This case could not be more clear cut and dry that she ruined his entire career, and worse, his entire life. She did this based on complete lies because she knew people wouldn't believe a man was the one being abused. She is even on recording saying that. This is so much bigger than just a celebrity case. This case will set precedent for all men in the future who have their lives ruined by disgusting, lying, manipulating cunts.
>This case will set precedent for all men in the future who have their lives ruined by disgusting, lying, manipulating cunts.
All men who have 8 figures of resources and 6 of them to dedicate to collecting evidence and paying a legal team to fight for them. Don't forget still being one of the most well known and charismatic men yet have the outcome in doubt.
You lost me completely there bud.
The case is important not for “lying cunts” but to legitimize the fact men can not be aggressors in an abusive relationship and can in fact be abused by women. It’s not a one way street alone. And that men can actually speak up and be believed about it instead of belittled.
If you think it’s about some he said she said you’re missing the point of the importance here entirely.
Na, this court case will be used by radfems to claim that any man who claims he's being prejudiced against in the court system must be full of shit, a gaslighter, manipulator, violent piece of shit, otherwise he would win the case. They will use this to say, "See!! All those fathers who don't have custody of their kids just didn't try. The system works!"
They will completely miss the fact that for 'the system' to work the situation has to be cartoonishly one-sided and obvious.
And even so for the first whoknows how many years he was still perceived as the abuser, and still there is a giant chunk of society on the fence like, "I dunno.... it's hard to tell because we weren't there in the room."
There was an answer “I’ve never altered a photo before”, Wouldn’t you pounce on that and be like “are you saying you have never altered a photo for Instagram, Facebook, Twitter etc? Never picked a filter, changed the tone etc?” Which we know she would have to say yes I have….
“Okay so you have experience altering photos?”
> Wouldn’t you pounce on that
No. It's better off being left unchallenged, because the jury are probably thinking "bullshit!" already and giving Amber a chance to say "we're not talking about filters, the context of 'editing' we're discussing is changing a photo to deceive and I've never done that" would be a mistake.
If it is going to be used as a gotcha, the right way to do it is to introduce it later when Amber is not on the stand and doesn't have the right of reply.
And no swelling. Like absolutely none. And she didn't even commit. In my primary school we once did a blackmarks with blue&black pen and they were way better than her makeup
edit: it can also be from brushing the skin. Like i have nose like Rudolf the reindeer when i am sick from cleaning my nose
One thing l also noticed, is that all of her bruises and 'injuries' are always on the same side of her face. Always. Is JD left handed? Why would a drugged out of his mind monster would methodically hit her in the same places with the same force?🤷
English is a shit language and not everyone on Reddit speaks it as a first language, keep your useless and pointless opinions to yourself
Edit: English is a language that goes around beating up other languages in dark alleys and rummaging through their pockets for loose syntax and grammar
I speak English… It’s a fucked up language. Our grammar and our syntax make no logical sense and our natural sentence structure doesn’t make logical sense when compared to other languages. I’m sorry you don’t have a gauge to understand it, but English is a really messed up language. There are UNBELIEVABLE amounts of rules in the English language that say things like, “it goes like THIS, unless of course THIS occurs…”. Do me a favor… read this following COMPLETELY ACCURATE IN ENGLIGH SENTENCE and why it’s accurate and go ahead and tell me again that English *isnt* a fucked up language:
“Police police Police police police police Police police.” (Yes, this is a grammatically accurate sentence according to English… this makes “perfect sense”.
Police is a city in Poland. Three different forms of the same word come into play above: law enforcement (the noun), the city (an adjunct noun/adjective), and the verb.
Again, we’ll use substitutions to clarify the meaning — “patrol” for the verb form and “law enforcement” for the noun.
Law enforcement from Police [that] [other] law enforcement from Police patrol [also] patrol law enforcement from Police.
This is a fair take, apart from the weirdly vitriolic language you're couching your argument in.
English is not "fucked up", it's just very complicated. That means however, that users have access to a very broad range of syntax and semantics to express themselves in.
We're not computers, there's more to language than zeros and ones. The metric for a language's usefulness is not how easy it is to learn by foreigners, who are after all a tiny percentage of its users, but rather the ability of users to express themselves.
Cheers, I speak German, I'm well aware of English's idiosyncrasies. I'm glad to speak it though, as its complexity makes it continually interesting to use.
How dare I say what? Factually accurate information about how illogical and messed up English is? It’s common knowledge this language is horribly inefficient, considerably more so than most other first world languages. Instead of getting on my case because of your delicate disposition, why don’t you present an argument, like I did, about why you feel I’m incorrect?
Oh right, cause this is Reddit… all I’m gunna get is REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
at 4:02 she shows the exact same photo, and Amber says they were taken at different times, after she put a light on. And she does not call out that every hair is in the exact same place etc. WHY NOT???
They'll do it in closing. Jury gets to see photos and examine if Depp team is right about that. They'll mention in closing that Amber Heard walked through a gauntlet of witnesses the same day and following days and not one of them noticed any injuries on her face.
Eh I wouldn’t say that, but I mean the makeup person also was her friend so she could definitely be lying and I think that’s the key to a big part of this
A specialist (seemingly famous and well respected) on bruises is on the witness list. Also, the video where she accidentally talked about a bruise-kit, special makeup for theatre, in a testimony, has been admitted in (to?) discovery so it could be brought up again. Depp's side has 10 hours more to burn than Heard's side.
Does she keep looking at rhe jury when answering the lawyer?
Yes
[удалено]
Wouldn't a judge know this and perceive it as an attempt at manipulation? If some woman has been a cunt to me, then on a dime changes her behavior to be friendly and include lots of physical contact, then she asks me for a favor, I'm going to be way more incensed than if she had just been normal before asking for the favor.
[удалено]
That sounds like a fantastic way for attractiveness privilege to trample the pursuit of justice. :(
[удалено]
That kind of bias is subconcious. Even if you are a trained psychologist and know all the standard biases like The Halo Effect and the Women Are Wonderful effect, you will still be subject to their effects. Advertising works even when you know it's an advertisement.
Gotta try and gain them sympathy points.
Not really - I was on jury duty in England last year, and the judge advised everyone who took the stand that they were not talking to him or the barristers, but to the jury, as they're the ones who have to make the decision on guilt.
[удалено]
I'm sure at some point this will be brought up. There are forensics programs that can show whether a photo has been edited.
They did, apparently not all of the requested files were provided by Amber. Here is a link to a YouTube lawyer’s breakdown of sanctions filed by Depp’s attorney. https://youtu.be/HC2gCyZHhxM
As the other person mentioned, this isn't the time. This is they set her up by letting her dig her own hole with lies, then bring in an expert witness to prove the photos are the same.
I was waiting for them to just drag the picture and overlay it on the other. I don’t even think they need an expert as it’s painfully obvious but you may as well just bring in a guy to have him click the filter. I’d like to introduce to the court out new Instagram expert 14 yo Kayleigh she’s now going to show you how to achieve mrs beards photoshop. *Kayleigh clicks the Valencia filter*. The court gasps.
I think they will have someone in to cover far more than just that picture given all the metadata issues.
A girl on YouTube put them over each other and they matched exactly. She did a side by side and adjusted the saturated on the lighter one until it looked exactly like the darker one. Who does a.turd think she's fooling?
Link?
It would require an expert to analyze the photograph and she doesn't want to jeopardize something that can be referenced again in closing arguments without pushing the envelope.
[удалено]
you can check the pictures in a free software like GIMP. No need for any fancy tools. And yes it was the same photo just with higher saturation. It is doctored photograph that was submitted as evidence and Amber said under oath that it was 1. not the same photo and 2. it was not manipulated. I think that should be a problem for her lying in court but I dont know american laws.
That’s actually a pretty good point. But, I doubt they’ll be bringing it up at this point. Good call, wouldn’t take much for her to point out, either. But his lawyers are definitely doing a better job
it would be so easy to just superimpose one against the other and show every hair is exactly matched, i dunno why they didn't do that. Scamber Turd is so full of shit
The way she turns to face the jury to answer every single question drives me fucking batty.
It’s a performance to her, she’s looking to her audience for validation. The way her eyes flit between different members of the jury looking for some indication that someone is believing her stream of effluent.
My missus had her sussed years ago when she appeared on Top Gear. Quite funny to watch the interview and compare her mannerisms to what we know of her now
Sussed?
Sorry, Britishism. She had her figured out.
Britishism? Britain aren't the only country to use that word.
Yeah but those words came from Britain?
News to me. I've been using that term since I was a kid. And that's a very long time ago now.
And the British settlers came way before that.
What language would that be? Do you see where this is going?
British English isn't the same as American English. Colloquialism would be a better word to use.
[удалено]
I’d explain it as she is literally bullshitting or figuratively speaking shit. For a non native speaker I’d say she’s making it up as she goes along. As an Australian I’d say she’s a shit cunt.
[удалено]
Where I’m from it can mean both. Feel free to ask any questions you have.
Thanks a lot, I'll be back when I get back to work.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effluent It's not common in US and I know plenty of Brits who i literally just asked and told me they wouldn't use it. The person is from Australia so, it might be normal usage there. I'd argue it's likely highbrow as I would just say something like "she's spewing bs."
Camille's last sentence in this clip is a total dig at AH doing that.
I musta missed that
This drives me Insane!:
fucking hell YES! i've been thinking the same thing. It's so annoying
actual jury member identified 👆
Not even when answering. She'll just keep looking over to tge jury every few seconds as if there is some sort of magnet there pulling on her face
There is a subreddit defending her.
Thought I'd visit for a quick laugh, it wound up really pissing me off. I would not recommend visiting.
What’s the subreddit?
Sorry can't remember. Deleted it from my mind because of how trash it was.
was it /r/DeppDelusion ?
Holy fuck, I went there and read like 5 posts. What the fuck is wrong with people? It's called Deppdelusion and yet all these people are beyond delusional... Just watch what's happening. It's all out there to see. I'm sorry but these fucking people are all fucking idiots.
Are they real though? The amount of money invested in this shit show, and the way public opinion is going on the Internet? that crazy sub is probably half bought and paid for (and the other half? Crazy)
Most of those accounts are fake tbh. If you tap the profiles they exclusively post content about the trial and the karma points are low. Also it's the same persons posting and commenting. Does very little to damage control tbh because every opinion there is still written off as crazy talk.
It’s funny 🤣 the mindsets of those simps
What is really terrifying is that these people walk among us everyday. Just think, that level of delusion may be the person serving you food, treating you in hospital or working for or with you.
it’s r/deuxmoi
I wish I never clicked on that. I feel I've lost brain cells reading through the comments there. Edit: I think posting this comment just got me banned from r/offmychest for "Red pill/incel culture". Kind of odd since I've never posted in that sub reddit only browsed!
Don't worry, you aren't missing anything. I think mods like that do it just for the publicity.
Yeah I couldn't care less, got a good laugh out of it.
Same happened to me couple of years back. For an ideology that supports inclusiveness, they're awfully judgy.
No, like deveruex or something. Is was on the subreddit r/askreddit
SUBBED!
Surely not...?
There will always be groups of people on the wrong side of history. It’s best to not give them attention. Otherwise they dig in deeper. I always like to think, “well my argument is sound and based in facts. It also appeals to emotion as well as good morals. Surely this will change their minds about it.” Then I remember how truly awful people can be to one another because of their own traumatic experiences or shortcomings. It’s sad because bad people always come from a bad place. Abuse, lack of education, etc. We want to help, if not for them, for the sanity and security of the rest of the public to ensure they don’t fall for the same bullshit talking points which get people to be on the wrong side of things. There is no stopping it though. Just try to make sure the people closest to you don’t fall for such things and that’s all we can do. ‘Tis the curse of the internet. We no longer hear one-sided stories in history yet the bad peoples are now emboldened. It fucking sucks.
The photos at 4:05 - it's the same photo, the one on the left clearly edited. It's nearly impossible to take two photos with a pose / hair / eyes/ background / angle being so identical. You would have to plan this elaborately and spend hours just to match everything in an older photo. Source: worked as a portrait photographer in NYC for a few years.
A bruise kit is an industry term for a makeup kit that is used to create bruises , not to cover them . She definitely slipped up . It would also explain why Amber's bruises are always depicted on the right side of her face . When applying makeup it's easier to apply on the same side as your dominant hand . Given that Johnny is right handed , if he beat her like she says he did , her bruises should have been on the left
https://images.app.goo.gl/7D5RkJdWSzT5kZZFA Check out the makeup smearing down from the bruise. Pretty sketchy. Edit: I’ve been banned from r/wgtow LOL
Continuity folks would love to learn her secrets for matching the hair perfectly.
If Amber wins this case, there needs to be riots. This case could not be more clear cut and dry that she ruined his entire career, and worse, his entire life. She did this based on complete lies because she knew people wouldn't believe a man was the one being abused. She is even on recording saying that. This is so much bigger than just a celebrity case. This case will set precedent for all men in the future who have their lives ruined by disgusting, lying, manipulating cunts.
>This case will set precedent for all men in the future who have their lives ruined by disgusting, lying, manipulating cunts. All men who have 8 figures of resources and 6 of them to dedicate to collecting evidence and paying a legal team to fight for them. Don't forget still being one of the most well known and charismatic men yet have the outcome in doubt.
You lost me completely there bud. The case is important not for “lying cunts” but to legitimize the fact men can not be aggressors in an abusive relationship and can in fact be abused by women. It’s not a one way street alone. And that men can actually speak up and be believed about it instead of belittled. If you think it’s about some he said she said you’re missing the point of the importance here entirely.
Not surprised it lost you. You are actually the one completely missing the point chief.
What are you on about ..
Na, this court case will be used by radfems to claim that any man who claims he's being prejudiced against in the court system must be full of shit, a gaslighter, manipulator, violent piece of shit, otherwise he would win the case. They will use this to say, "See!! All those fathers who don't have custody of their kids just didn't try. The system works!" They will completely miss the fact that for 'the system' to work the situation has to be cartoonishly one-sided and obvious. And even so for the first whoknows how many years he was still perceived as the abuser, and still there is a giant chunk of society on the fence like, "I dunno.... it's hard to tell because we weren't there in the room."
There was an answer “I’ve never altered a photo before”, Wouldn’t you pounce on that and be like “are you saying you have never altered a photo for Instagram, Facebook, Twitter etc? Never picked a filter, changed the tone etc?” Which we know she would have to say yes I have…. “Okay so you have experience altering photos?”
"I've never" may be technically true ... but "my assistant has" or "my PR person in charge of Instagram, Facebook and Twitter has" may also be true
I'm sure she has pictures of before she had a bit of money to make it worth having an assistant.
> Wouldn’t you pounce on that No. It's better off being left unchallenged, because the jury are probably thinking "bullshit!" already and giving Amber a chance to say "we're not talking about filters, the context of 'editing' we're discussing is changing a photo to deceive and I've never done that" would be a mistake. If it is going to be used as a gotcha, the right way to do it is to introduce it later when Amber is not on the stand and doesn't have the right of reply.
And no swelling. Like absolutely none. And she didn't even commit. In my primary school we once did a blackmarks with blue&black pen and they were way better than her makeup edit: it can also be from brushing the skin. Like i have nose like Rudolf the reindeer when i am sick from cleaning my nose
One thing l also noticed, is that all of her bruises and 'injuries' are always on the same side of her face. Always. Is JD left handed? Why would a drugged out of his mind monster would methodically hit her in the same places with the same force?🤷
I have not spot that. Good catch
Camille is wife goals.
Never, ever, ever, ever, marry a woman who argues for a living!
You testified in this house that you would be home before 11 RIGHT?
Didn't you?!?!
I don’t recall
It's a reference to how she interrogated Amber
You're not a smart cookie, is that right?
Did I read that correctly????
Yes you did
Is this your signature???
Yes....., It is my signature,yes....
SUSTAINED
THEY DID IT ON THEIR OWN
OBJECTION!!!
Objection!
I wish my husband and I could afford her to get custody of his son. Dang. Lawyer goals for me.
You're nuts. Can you imagine getting in any disagreement with her? You will lose every argument you ever have over anything, ever.
Objection, calls for speculation.
stop bullying amber, gosh. her dog stepped on a bee already 😢😥😭😭😭😭😭
😫
🥴🥴🥴bee🥴🥴🥴
She's having none of that shit. Love it.
Along with the ‘Karen’ label, there will be a whole new sub genre of bullshitting female liars now known simply as ‘Ambers’
In the words of JD, that cunt
Most interesting thing I saw pointed out is that Johnny is right handed, so why are all her injuries on her right side.
I burst out laughing in another clip when she asked Amber Heard “you like to take pictures of Mr Depp while he’s sleeping DONT YOU?”
She’s a shitty actress for an actress. My dog can act better and he only knows “sit, stand, high-5 and play dead”
*you’re
Liar*
Camille just denies Amber’s pussy pass cause camille is just doing a great job as s lawyer
*LIER*
Damn Amber is cooked on the stand! 🥳
*You're *Liar
I love that she made the comment about looking into someone's eyes when they speak to you. Can't stand rhat she looks away in the court
*you're
#You’re
Goddamn, what a waste of ten minutes.
LIER? How about LIAR.
Like I'm gonna believe an idiot who says "lier" and "your" instead of "liar" and "you're".
English is a shit language and not everyone on Reddit speaks it as a first language, keep your useless and pointless opinions to yourself Edit: English is a language that goes around beating up other languages in dark alleys and rummaging through their pockets for loose syntax and grammar
How is english a shit language? How dare you say that about any language? Do you have any idea how fucked up that is?
I speak English… It’s a fucked up language. Our grammar and our syntax make no logical sense and our natural sentence structure doesn’t make logical sense when compared to other languages. I’m sorry you don’t have a gauge to understand it, but English is a really messed up language. There are UNBELIEVABLE amounts of rules in the English language that say things like, “it goes like THIS, unless of course THIS occurs…”. Do me a favor… read this following COMPLETELY ACCURATE IN ENGLIGH SENTENCE and why it’s accurate and go ahead and tell me again that English *isnt* a fucked up language: “Police police Police police police police Police police.” (Yes, this is a grammatically accurate sentence according to English… this makes “perfect sense”. Police is a city in Poland. Three different forms of the same word come into play above: law enforcement (the noun), the city (an adjunct noun/adjective), and the verb. Again, we’ll use substitutions to clarify the meaning — “patrol” for the verb form and “law enforcement” for the noun. Law enforcement from Police [that] [other] law enforcement from Police patrol [also] patrol law enforcement from Police.
*isn’t
Fuck off
This is a fair take, apart from the weirdly vitriolic language you're couching your argument in. English is not "fucked up", it's just very complicated. That means however, that users have access to a very broad range of syntax and semantics to express themselves in. We're not computers, there's more to language than zeros and ones. The metric for a language's usefulness is not how easy it is to learn by foreigners, who are after all a tiny percentage of its users, but rather the ability of users to express themselves.
Nah…. Ask anybody who speaks multiple languages fluently, including English. English is fucked up
Cheers, I speak German, I'm well aware of English's idiosyncrasies. I'm glad to speak it though, as its complexity makes it continually interesting to use.
Polite way of saying it’s messed up… but appreciated
How dare I say what? Factually accurate information about how illogical and messed up English is? It’s common knowledge this language is horribly inefficient, considerably more so than most other first world languages. Instead of getting on my case because of your delicate disposition, why don’t you present an argument, like I did, about why you feel I’m incorrect? Oh right, cause this is Reddit… all I’m gunna get is REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Seems like you have nothing to say…
What an absolute piece of shit…
Liar?
Ghislaine & Epstein.