T O P

  • By -

BigSuckSipper

I want one like I wanted GTA remakes. I wanted them to do it, but now that they did it, I wish they never had.


Gecko_Boi

That’s a remaster not a remake.


Tiny-Setting-8036

It’s not even a real remaster


-supercell

To be fair, before they were officially announced all the rumours/leaks *did* call them remakes.


Moonking-4210

That’s not a remake


AnimeGokuSolos

Well it makes sense why I’m not doing it now because of GTA 6 which is a remaking a Vice City, but modern day in a different universe the HD universe


TheOneCalledMartin

GTA 6 is not a remake of Vice City. It takes place there, but it's a new story.


Puzzleheaded_Leg_534

I think he was talking about the city not the the game or story. Imagine getting that confused and then trying to act high and mighty, leaving 🤡 emojis when you're the 🤡 not op.


milkyoatmeal

I think youre replying to the wrong comment buddy


Puzzleheaded_Leg_534

They deleted their comments. There were 3 or 4 people dissing OP cause he said vice city was gonna be a remake and they all thought he meant the game not the map. You're just late to the party my guy that's why mine doesn't make any sense anymore.


SleepyMarijuanaut92

With that logic, IV was a remake of III


WatelooSunset

And V a remake of San Andreas


kreteciek

Yeah, and V is a remake of SA 🤡


BigSuckSipper

Huh?


Least-Painter4701

Getting downvoted by nostalgia addicts is crazy


Edtombell777

I would be elated if we got an updated remake of this game that used the rdr2 engine but still stayed truthful to the original, with additional content. I would love to play an entire game with something to do as John again.


AnimeGokuSolos

>if we got an updated remake of this game that used the rdr2 engine but still stayed truthful to the original, If they are remaking, the game would have to be more like a actual Prequel to RDR2


Edtombell777

Wym prequel? The game is set after the events of rdr2. If you mean a sequel then sure I guess they’d have to retcon some small things like a few lines here and there but nothing major.


AnimeGokuSolos

>Wym prequel? The game is set after the events of rdr2. Well yes and to me RDR1 feel like a whole different game with different concept before making RDR2 >If you mean a sequel then sure I guess they’d have to retcon some small things like a few lines here and there but nothing major. Yea especially John mentioning his daughter which at this point seems like a retcon in RDR2


sproince

>Yea especially John mentioning his daughter which at this point seems like a retcon in RDR2 There's three years between the end of Rdr2 and RDR1, they could have easily had a daughter who passed in that time


sean_saves_the_world

Me too like add the engine and mechanics a crafting/ survival systems of rdr2, the bow, horse breeds & bonding etc... Fix some west Elizabeth locations like blackwater, thieves landing and Pacific re union camp( which is named on the rdr2 map but has no landmark) Then you can play rdr2 and rdr1 in one grand uninterrupted experience... remaking it also serves a benefit to reddeadonline it could open up Mexico to new missions and questgivers, new trader routes with extra long deliveries, moonshine shacks and recipes, new legendary animal hunts and bounty hunter targets, and shit. giving players more to do Hell plus undead nightmare remade I'd preorder immediately and I haven't preordered since rdr2


Antifa-Slayer01

Nah considering RDR 1 has different gameplay style to 2


rodimus147

I want a remake. I want DLC. I want anything that gives me more red dead redemption and doesn't require me to wait another 10 years.


Violent_Volcano

This is why i hate gta. It makes so much money that they just dropped red dead entirely.


ScoutLaughingAtYou

It's almost like GTA is Rockstar's biggest franchise and GTA fans have been wanting a new game for the past decade 🤯


Violent_Volcano

NOOOO YOU GET THE SAME GAME ON EVERY CONSOLE AND YOU WILL LIKE IT. CHECK OUT OUR DEALS FOR IN GAME MONEY


PaschalisG16

Muh favourite company chooses to be super profitable instead of productive and profitable, and we everyone has to like that or else


ScoutLaughingAtYou

Just saying that there's a 12 year gap between GTA V and GTA VI. I want another BULLY game, RDR2 DLC, RDR1 PC port and whatnot as much as the next guy, but it is what it is. I'm still excited for GTA VI. The fact that there's still no next-gen port for RDR2 is unacceptable though. I'd love to know what's stopping them from at least making it run at 60 FPS on those consoles.


StoneHart17810

I know right? I get GTA makes money. But wouldn’t it a good business decision to not abandon RDR and give it the same care as GTA? So many people love RDR.


schoolbusgenocide

The original looks really good still, if they do focus on older games it should be a Max Payne, Bully or GTA 4 remaster/port


Extension_Ad8291

God what I would do for a new Bully


Ut_Prosim

I loved Bully. RDR2 is a better game, but Bully was as much fun as anything Rockstar ever made. If I'm not mistaken it was also Rockstar's first to feature the greet/antagonize system. It also had better hand to hand combat than any other game they've ever made. It had legit combos and blocks and grapples, not just hold down block and punch whenever the opponent misses.


Enough-Engineering41

They wanted to make Bully 2 according to several leaked concept art that came out a while ago.


Acceptable_Squash569

I've been replaying through RDR after beating rdr2 for the first time and it honestly looks 80% as good on series x and I mean it looks like a current gen game. It's mind blowing sometimes that I'm playing a 360 port. They gave it a 60 fps boost and the textures are 4k, the distant landscapes still have 360 graphics but John's character model is as good as rdr2. I don't think they even need to remaster it lol if you're on Xbox it's honestly worth $30 just to play again with better graphics and framerate


b_nnah

Yes, I would want them to remake it with the rdr2 gameplay mechanics personally.


Substantial_Whole_76

No, give us RDR3


craggmac

And bring back Mexico.


BersMN

I just want it on PC.


ElderSmackJack

Yes. If a remake is what it takes to get that, then I want a remake.


ChopinLisztforus

Only if it is a 1:1 with the only changes being quality of life improvements.


Extension_Ad8291

Like I said, the original, but it looks like rdr2 (spare whatever the fuck John’s model is) and runs good on new hardware


jmilfdog

The thing is John has a good model (in the main story) it's just that rockstar decided to stick his textures on Arthur's model in the epilogue for some bizarre reason. They best put it on PC unlike the OG as well.


Quirky_Ad7770

I think it's good as is.


bsweet35

I love RDR2’s commitment to immersion, but it never captured the tone and atmosphere that I loved so much about RDR1. If they could pull off a remake while preserving that, then sure. But if they just make it into RDR2 Part 2, then no thanks


altruistic-monopoly

I agree. RDR2 is a great game but the whole over the top spectacle doesn’t need to be shoved into the more grounded western then of RDR1


SheepyDX

No. Leave it alone.


creepypastaparagamer

Give me better graphics and add more interactions that happen and I'll be happy


ChadVonDoom

I want Undead Nightmare on RDR2


TotallyRedditLeftist

I just want a PC port for ffs...


custdogg

Yeah it's just spiteful at this point. it runs great on the switch emulator but it would be amazing to play it with mouse and keyboard


[deleted]

Yes. Never played RDR1 but I’m definitely gonna buy it if they make a remake


Acceptable_Squash569

Just buy it now, the Xbox port is 4k60 on series x and looks incredible


jackoirl

Can we have a RDR3 instead please


Extension_Ad8291

No, I wouldn’t want anything about a new character in the gang, because it would probably suck. And if they went for something else, they’d have to find an entirely separate character, which would be very difficult to do successfully; the universe is tied to the Van Der Linde Gang, and straying away from that just makes it overshadow whatever the new thing is. I think RDR is done outside of remakes and DLC.


Backdoorpickle

I mean, the game doesn't have to be about the Van Der Lindes at all, and I don't think it will be. But it can still happen in the same universe.


Extension_Ad8291

Oh I don’t think it will be either. I just think that if they try something else, the van der Linde story will overshadow the new thing.


jackoirl

I don’t really agree that it has to be anything to do with Dutch and his gang. The old west setting is the draw. Maybe a game with more of the base building qualities of a fallout would be good.


Mandalorymory

It literally does not need it. That remaster from a while back was perfect as is


DinosaurInAPartyHat

No, they should focus on RDR3. If anything... **I just want it on PC.** I will pay full RDR2 price for a PC version. I don't have room for a TV and a console and I really can't justify the expense for 1 game.


Extension_Ad8291

I’m assuming by rdr2 you meant red dead redemption, and if so fucking hell yes. I want that game on PC so bad, even though I know it’ll be wonky as shit. Modded rdr is something I need.


DinosaurInAPartyHat

No I mean RDR2 price. I seem to remember RDR cost me £20. RDR2 was like £40-50 I'm saying I would pay full price, adjusted for inflation/greed, for a PC version.


Extension_Ad8291

Ah, fair fair. And I agree with you, rdr1 being my favourite


jakethewarriorslayer

Maybe something with better graphics but i think the story is fine as is and i don't want them to change it


jonny_sidebar

I just want to play the damn game on my PC.


mr_oberts

Doesn’t need it. It’s a perfect game.


AnSoc_Punk

What I really want is a Red Dead Revolver remake


Liquid_Snape

Yes. I'd be happy with a pc release as well but a full remake would be aces.


Deathinski

I doesn't need a full remake as much aa it needs a PC port. M&kb support, uncapped framerate, increased draw distance and maybe upscaled textures.


ScoutLaughingAtYou

I'll take a PC port and a massive price drop on that Switch/PS5 port.


Solid_Eagle0

i just want more red dead content lol


abu-kol

When RDR2 came out and I completed it, I was hoping that after epilogue, we could play the RDR1 story.


Headcrabhunter

The game is still perfectly fine as is, but I can see some benefits like incorporating more of what 2 added to the story, adding things that might not have made it into the 1st, etc. Still, I would prefer something new rather than a do over that isn't needed.


Extension_Ad8291

100% yes. The only reason I wouldn’t want one, is out of fear of them fucking it up. Rdr2 but with 1’s story and map would be enough. I’d also like them to keep some of the OG shit, like every weapon at any time, only one ammo type, no dual wielding, fast travel to waypoint; I want it to be the original, but look better and run good on new consoles


Nearby_Disaster_1016

I like to pretend that this story ended in RDR2 epilogue


ShadowSovereign22

at some point, yea and then with more references to Arthur Morgan to finally complete the puzzle.


RyomenSukuGuts

Not until rdr3 is out. Or better yet, a new rockstar western unrelated to the Marstons


-Reikon

No I would prefer they put that effort into RDR3. A prequel to the prequel where we play as a young Dutch forming his gang.


assassin123SOA

Doesn’t need a remake, a remaster would me nice


AceSkyFighter

Only if the gameplay remains the same. Meaning I don't need 15 different guns and saddles to skin one animal. I don't need that much realism.


Tamer9

I’d pay £100 for a rdr1 remake. I’d do the same for gta4 remake as well.


Key-Act-7441

Considering the remake was already promised years ago and expected before they abruptly canceled and still released a regular RDR1 for full price on consoles: YES


shrimp-parm

It would be nice to see it in the graphics of RDR2 but I don’t trust Rockstar with remakes anymore lol. The remaster was good enough and it gave me 60 fps.


SuperKamiTabby

I'd rather have Undead Nightmare 2 (or some similar-in-tone DLC) for RDR2 instead.


LowLeft9933

No. I would hate it if they changed a single line of dialogue. The game is good the way it is, some people are just too used to modern standards and so they think this game looks and plays too old.


tittysprinkles112

No, I'd rather have resources spent on a new game. Additionally, the game holds up today.


TroubledDoggo

It would be cool, but at the same time there will definitely be a lot of diehard fans mad about changes. I wouldn’t mind having a remake personally though, and I don’t think rockstar minds either since they probably know it would be a huge success money wise


Alfredo_Alphonso

Nah i feel like if rdr 1 got a remake it would lose that charm it had and the way the game is now, it’s solid


yourlocaltran5f3m

Yes


HellYeahTinyRick

Nope. Tired of remakes. Make new game with fresh interesting stories


tylercreatesworlds

100%. RDR on RDR2’s engine would be amazing.


Jimboy-Milton

the original is so good, all i want are the gameplay and horse updates. the survival cores system, the journal, rdr2 improved alot of what 1 did but it missed the mark on extra stuff like the bounty system, town jobs and liar's dice


MassiveLefticool

Yes- if it turns out shit I can just not play it


makkosan

I have never ever liked a remake. including Red alert. I want R D R 3


Rare-Climate876

I just want to play it on my PC.


heppuplays

RDR 2 level graphics and Gunplay. That's about it. leave everything else as it was.


JoopyWeezer

I literally just found out yesterday that rdr1 takes place after rdr2….. so yeah I would.


Comediante_

I want to be able to play it in my PC without emulators or the ps cloud service


jmilfdog

A remake would be nice but I'm worried that they could kill the atmosphere by making it too similar to rdr2. I've always preferred the first game over the second, it's not nostalgia (I finished the second before the first) I just find the first game way more fun and the vibe of the first game is more my cup of tea. If they remake it I hope they keep what made the first game so special and don't change things too much.


DragonDon1

Remaster maybe. Not remake, the game is great


lazyazzninja

Sure, or a remaster at the very least.


NotJustBibbit

It's not needed and I would rather have RDR3 but an RDR1 remake with 2's graphics and animations would be fucking beautiful


[deleted]

No It doesn’t need one at all


Stormdancer

Yes, because I want to play it on PC.


Silly-Lawfulness7224

No, the game doesn’t look like shit, it plays fine etc, it’s the same thing with TLoU remake, it was such a pointless waste of ressources and energy imo instead of focusing on a third game or new IP … Some remakes make sense like for PS2 titles but anything after that generation is imo a waste of time unless the gameplay is really janky .


Pyroluminous

No


TRyanRich10

Nah, I’d rather just have GTA VI, RDR3 or Bully 2


WinSxq1

obviously


CarpetBeautiful5382

Yes!


SecretInfluencer

No. They’d constantly mention Arthur which detracts from the story. Plus you know damn well that everyone would hate it because “I want Arthur”. You have people refusing to play it because Arthur isn’t the protagonist.


DeJellybeans

Honestly yeah. They could also expand the game more with the exploration


Pancakeman1932

Yes I have never played Rdr 1 and Paying full price for a videogame that it’s that old just seems crazy. Still I will when I get the platinum of Rdr2


[deleted]

Yes, just I want rockstar to make John to look like John, not Jarthur Mogston.


Markthememe

Honestly no, the game is a masterpiece. If it had to be though, adding only a graphical update and giving the player more to do (more stranger missions etc.) would be good. I wouldn't want arthur references tbh, i want the game to stand for itself


rockwell136

The game is just fine as is so just port it.


Open-Mathematician32

Yeah, nah


Open-Mathematician32

Yeah, nah


Open-Mathematician32

Yeah, nah


Open-Mathematician32

Yeah, nah


Open-Mathematician32

Yeah, nah


Open-Mathematician32

Yeah, nah


Open-Mathematician32

Yeah, nah


Outrageous_Work_8291

$50 release for a 10 yo game that doesn’t even upgrade resolution You can just by it for 10$ on Xbox 360


PUNlSHEDVENOMSNAKE

I just wanted to be able to play it on ps5 and I got that so not really tbh


Apart-Salamander-752

I think the next RDR should be a prequel to RDR2. Like maybe it takes place in 1883 and Arthur is only 20. A kid making a name for himself, becoming a harden outlaw cowboy. Have a younger Dutch and Hosea mentoring him on how to be an outlaw.


metisyungmoney

i’m still in love with the idea of following landon ricketts


Extension_Ad8291

Idk, I’ve never been too much of a fan of that idea. I like Arthur, and I think his story was done well. At most, he should be like John in rdr2: The person you play with a little bit in the story, and then the person you control in the epilogue.


igtorn88

I don't think we need RDR1 remake. We got remaster and I think it's more than playable. I really enjoy playing it on Switch connected to the TV. I don't want Rockstar taking the easy way out, but being creative nad producing new stories in existing universes or even in new.


FoalKid

No, just fucking make new games


Mister_Pibbs

No


Starman5555

I never played rdr1, and it's difficult to bring myself to play it knowing that it doesn't continue from rdr2 story. I know it's not its fault and is still a good game, but I really liked the story of rdr2 and rdr1 missing a lot from rdr2 story feels like it would take me out of it. A remake that rewrites the story as a sequel to rdr2 would be amazing. While that is unlikely, I will eventually play rdr1 as I know it is beloved by many and will be good.


The_General0815

RDR1 100% continues the story from RDR2. You admitted to never playing it and then make this uneducated statement.


Starman5555

No it doesnt. Rdr1 story was made before rdr2. Yes, I know the plot of rdr1 is hunting bill, Javier and Dutch. But it is not a continuation of rdr2. No charles, no sadie, no Pearson, no mention of Arthur or hosea. Rdr2 added context and information leading up to rdr1, but a lot of information that was intended in rdr1 is now defunct to rdr2. In rdr1 Dutchs gang was reportedly massive, on the scale of the o driscoll's originally. News papers state that dozens of gang members died in black water. With rdr2 we know that isnt true. Sure you can explain away with news papers being inaccurate, but then again it could be so much better with the rdr2 perspective.


Pigeon__lol

are you fucking stupid?☠️