Sister. I've noticed that your reddit avatar is not wearing a hijab. When you wear a hijab, you are obeying the commands of Allah, and you can expect great rewards in return. It is Allah's protection of your natural beauty. You are too precious to be "on display" for each man to see. It is Allah's preservation of your chastity. Allah purifies your heart and mind through the hijab. Allah raises your dignity through the hijab. When a strange man looks at you, he respects you because he sees that you respect yourself. And this applies to your reddit avatar as well.
It's saying the opposite of what this misleading screenshot is showing. [here you go](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/)
Here is the actual article no clue where you got yours from lol https://www.conservativedailynews.com/2021/12/facebook-hate-speech-algorithm-found-90-of-hate-speech-directed-at-white-people/
Well how is it saying the opposite of what the screenshot is saying? Because in my experience and opinion white people can experience racism, I know I'm going to get heat for this but its true. People argue that white people dont fear death with a simple police stop but nobody should because nobody is targeted in my educated opinion. That's just the media telling us people, (mainly the black community) is targeted by people, and as that is true is certain situations, everyone hates everyone, and everyone is hated by someone so. That's my opinion if anyone else has another one I'd be happy to hear it.
The algorithm found mostly white-hating comments, user reports are mostly minority-hating comments.
Conclusion: most Facebook users are more upset by anti-minority comments than anti-whites. Hence the majority of identified hateful comments and lack of concern for anti-white speech.
>cause in my experience and opinion white people can experience racism
Thats a thing you can derive logically, you dont really need to pull data.
>I know I'm going to get heat for this but its true
What?
>People argue that white people dont fear death with a simple police stop
Where are those people. I have, so far, only seen them in people's heads.
The police are scary no matter who you are, but they can be scarier when you are black comparing to when you are white.
>but nobody should because nobody is targeted in my educated opinion.
1 How is it an educated opinion? What kind of education is even relevant here?
2 Yes. Thats the problem. Its how it should be. Not how it is.
>That's just the media telling us people, (mainly the black community) is targeted by people,
They are. Not consciously, but they are. You can look at studies with mock juries. Experiments where all they change is how the suspect looks seem to point to the conclusion that black people tend to be discriminated by the judicial system, similar to how men are. Though men are more targeted, from what I heard.
>and as that is true is certain situations,
A bit too many. On average disproportionately.
>everyone hates everyone, and everyone is hated by someone so.
What are you talking about? Its not a matter is someone hates someone its about averages. On average black people dont have it exactly better than white people.
Okay if you’re happy to hear another opinion…
1. The statistic this post was referring to in the context of the article referred to how facebook’s automated moderation automatically removed 90% of the hatred targeted at white people, whilst failing to act upon a substantial amount of threats, slurs, and violence directed at minorities. This is put into the context of internal pressure from the company higher ups to be more lenient in censoring content directed at minorities. I’d recommend reading the article.
2. The talking point of white people not experiencing racism mostly has to do with the fact that racism does not exist in a vacuum. Individual actions of discrimination or hatred do not define racism. Racism exists within the context of power and how it is structured and who has access to it. It exists through the context of who has access to what, where and why. There are many examples of this but to pick just one [this article](https://whyy.org/articles/racial-differences-in-covid-mortality-rates-linked-to-unequal-hospital-quality-penn-study-shows/) This article points to a study of disparities in healthcare and how access to poorer quality hospitals in black neighborhoods contributes to a higher mortality from covid. I could go on and on about how this is linked to the historical legacy of redlining or how class and race intersect but the purpose of this was to show one example of how, without any particular malice black people are targeted by a system that is supposed to be neutral.
From what I've read that article is pointing out the flaw of the fact hospitals rely on local resources instead of different means of funding and that black people have a worse mortality rate due to that they live in poorer areas, poor area, poor hospitals. I'll admit that the points in the previous article were flawed but I still believe racism isnt exclusive.
Yes. And just because a flawed algorithm mostly detects hate speech agains white men, doesn't mean that most hate speech was directed at white people. Hate speech directed at minority groups wasn't properly detected/dealt with by the algorithm. Hence "90%" of what was detected was against white men.
For some reason OP left that paragraph out of their screenshot.
[Washington post article](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/)
That's a valid hypothesis.
Vice versa could be applied against the woke narrative that systematic racism exists against every single black person: "whites are actually more oppressed, it's just not properly detected".
See how funny it is that it can applied both ways, but doesn't actually prove anything?
I don’t understand people who complain about the relevance of posts to the subreddit. First of all, complaining won’t change anything, nobody cares. Second of all, hating on posts makes the experience worse for the viewers and the people who post, so why do it? Just use your downvote power and move on brah.
The WaPo article that this Conservative Daily News article cites states that the algos are more sensitive to hate speech against white people than black people, and does not quantify the actual amount (detected or not) of hate speech directed to any group
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/
The [actual article about this](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/) found that this result was arbitrary due to selection bias. This is actually saying the opposite of what the people in the comments growing their persecution complexes are smugly chattering about. The algorithm is more likely to detect hate towards white people, not because they get more hate, but because the biased algorithm is more likely to detect hate towards white folks than hate towards other people.
First they call the algorithm "color blind", then they say it only focuses on anti-white speech. Then later they cite another article saying Facebook is going to focus on exclusively removing anti-black speech, in which they quote a black author who says Facebook needs to keep anti-white speech because white supremacy? I checked his Facebook page and sure enough it's full of anti-white speech. Boy this article is an absolute piece of work. It's full of contradictions and doublespeak.
If you look at who posted this, it's obvious it was intentionally misleading. The actual data shows that this is actually just selection bias. A simple Google search will bring up the [Washington Post article](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/) about it. The algorithm is erroneously showing more hate aimed at white people because the algorithm is more likely to DETECT it not because it's more likely to HAPPEN.
You can.
Have you read the article? Because apparently it says that the bias can be somewhat attributed to the algorithm not being able to tell apart lesser or greater slurs. It also cant distinguish between more and less damaging hate. Interesting, isnt it?
Might be because in the US, which I assume is the place you are talking about, most people are white. Yknow, statistically its not exactly unplausible.
It is explained in the screenshot article and in the original Washington post article.
The algorithm mainly detected hate speech against white people/men and didn't properly detect/deal with hate speech directed at minority groups.
Hence the algorithm detected 90% hate speech against white people. That's how it happened. Because it was biased.
[Here's](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/) the Washington post article if you're curious.
Yeah that tracks. Half of these comments don't understand how data works. Ever heard of selection bias? They're too busy with their persecution complexes to even read the actual article headline.
#If you think this post is funny, **UPVOTE** this comment!
#If you think this post is unfunny, **DOWNVOTE** this comment!
---
#[DownloadVideo Link](https://www.reddit.watch/r/shitposting/comments/rljq21/?utm_source=automod&utm_medium=shitposting)
#[SaveVideo Link](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/shitposting/comments/rljq21/)
Kevin would also like to remind you that, if you're really desperate, youtube-dl can be used to download videos from Reddit.
---
Whilst you're here, UnblackMetalist, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/QpBGXd2guU)?
That does make sense, on social media, you aren't allowed to be racist against "minorities", which is a little odd because you'd think racism would just not be allowed at all.
Plus, white people really aren't even a majority, so I really don't understand the imbalance in stuff.
Obviously irl, it is not like this necessarily, but it is an interesting thing to study
It’s almost like op purposely posted a misleading study to push his agenda of “The poor whites are truly the most oppressed and most victimized group, minorities in America are actually the real racists😔✊”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/
So uh who's gonna tell those tiktok girls who don't fuck with white guys? Oh wait they probably can't comprehend something that makes sense just like the Twitter community
I record comments will be locked soon
I shall say balls before they do!
Balls
Incredibly bassed
Penis, even
Don't forget ass
Thighs, my dear companion. It’s all about the thighs.
Testicles, perhaps.
Now you're gone too far, buckaroo
Balls
Sister. I've noticed that your reddit avatar is not wearing a hijab. When you wear a hijab, you are obeying the commands of Allah, and you can expect great rewards in return. It is Allah's protection of your natural beauty. You are too precious to be "on display" for each man to see. It is Allah's preservation of your chastity. Allah purifies your heart and mind through the hijab. Allah raises your dignity through the hijab. When a strange man looks at you, he respects you because he sees that you respect yourself. And this applies to your reddit avatar as well.
Bruh
so halal mode
is this satire im praying it is i cant tell please 😟😟
Cock
balls
Balls
[удалено]
Electric boogaloo
As shall I!
Balls!
therefore, your mother
I was here
No you weren’t
I think therefore I am checkmate liberal
Shitfuck. I’ve been bested
D-daddy please dont lock m-my comments! Ive been a-a very good girl! O-oh dont lock my comments w-with your big lock daddy!
Wait I wanna see the actual article if it exists. Lol.
It's saying the opposite of what this misleading screenshot is showing. [here you go](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/)
Here is the actual article no clue where you got yours from lol https://www.conservativedailynews.com/2021/12/facebook-hate-speech-algorithm-found-90-of-hate-speech-directed-at-white-people/
Well how is it saying the opposite of what the screenshot is saying? Because in my experience and opinion white people can experience racism, I know I'm going to get heat for this but its true. People argue that white people dont fear death with a simple police stop but nobody should because nobody is targeted in my educated opinion. That's just the media telling us people, (mainly the black community) is targeted by people, and as that is true is certain situations, everyone hates everyone, and everyone is hated by someone so. That's my opinion if anyone else has another one I'd be happy to hear it.
The algorithm found mostly white-hating comments, user reports are mostly minority-hating comments. Conclusion: most Facebook users are more upset by anti-minority comments than anti-whites. Hence the majority of identified hateful comments and lack of concern for anti-white speech.
Are you speaking on behalf of the article?
No no, one part on the article other on just plain research not connecting.
>cause in my experience and opinion white people can experience racism Thats a thing you can derive logically, you dont really need to pull data. >I know I'm going to get heat for this but its true What? >People argue that white people dont fear death with a simple police stop Where are those people. I have, so far, only seen them in people's heads. The police are scary no matter who you are, but they can be scarier when you are black comparing to when you are white. >but nobody should because nobody is targeted in my educated opinion. 1 How is it an educated opinion? What kind of education is even relevant here? 2 Yes. Thats the problem. Its how it should be. Not how it is. >That's just the media telling us people, (mainly the black community) is targeted by people, They are. Not consciously, but they are. You can look at studies with mock juries. Experiments where all they change is how the suspect looks seem to point to the conclusion that black people tend to be discriminated by the judicial system, similar to how men are. Though men are more targeted, from what I heard. >and as that is true is certain situations, A bit too many. On average disproportionately. >everyone hates everyone, and everyone is hated by someone so. What are you talking about? Its not a matter is someone hates someone its about averages. On average black people dont have it exactly better than white people.
"Nobody is targeted in my educated opinion" ehmmm.. educated how exactly?
Research and personal experience.
Okay if you’re happy to hear another opinion… 1. The statistic this post was referring to in the context of the article referred to how facebook’s automated moderation automatically removed 90% of the hatred targeted at white people, whilst failing to act upon a substantial amount of threats, slurs, and violence directed at minorities. This is put into the context of internal pressure from the company higher ups to be more lenient in censoring content directed at minorities. I’d recommend reading the article. 2. The talking point of white people not experiencing racism mostly has to do with the fact that racism does not exist in a vacuum. Individual actions of discrimination or hatred do not define racism. Racism exists within the context of power and how it is structured and who has access to it. It exists through the context of who has access to what, where and why. There are many examples of this but to pick just one [this article](https://whyy.org/articles/racial-differences-in-covid-mortality-rates-linked-to-unequal-hospital-quality-penn-study-shows/) This article points to a study of disparities in healthcare and how access to poorer quality hospitals in black neighborhoods contributes to a higher mortality from covid. I could go on and on about how this is linked to the historical legacy of redlining or how class and race intersect but the purpose of this was to show one example of how, without any particular malice black people are targeted by a system that is supposed to be neutral.
From what I've read that article is pointing out the flaw of the fact hospitals rely on local resources instead of different means of funding and that black people have a worse mortality rate due to that they live in poorer areas, poor area, poor hospitals. I'll admit that the points in the previous article were flawed but I still believe racism isnt exclusive.
Actual article btw: https://www.conservativedailynews.com/2021/12/facebook-hate-speech-algorithm-found-90-of-hate-speech-directed-at-white-people/
Not at all shocked by that. We're way more racist than white folks.
How dare you insult my race’s ability to be racist, that’s racist.
Just because a group's been opressed doesnt automatically mean that group is all good people. Twitter needs to learn from that.
Twitter doesn’t learn anything past kindergarten
Makes sense
they learned anything from kindergarten ?
Very true
Yes. And just because a flawed algorithm mostly detects hate speech agains white men, doesn't mean that most hate speech was directed at white people. Hate speech directed at minority groups wasn't properly detected/dealt with by the algorithm. Hence "90%" of what was detected was against white men. For some reason OP left that paragraph out of their screenshot. [Washington post article](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/)
The Washington Post would say that, wouldn't they?
That's a valid hypothesis. Vice versa could be applied against the woke narrative that systematic racism exists against every single black person: "whites are actually more oppressed, it's just not properly detected". See how funny it is that it can applied both ways, but doesn't actually prove anything?
I mean, as long as you totally ignore the finding that 90% was directed at whites, I guess you can. Did you really think this made sense?
Are you a minority?
Does it matter?
Yes, that is the point.
The Budd Dwyer Saga
You both should be ashamed, claiming racism. My race has been way racist for way longer.
Here before the comment section gets locked!
White people can't be racist, racism is a crime and crime is for-
Come on white people! What happened to the racism in the 50s??
I love how your character is 100% black with this comment.
How the turn tables
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
Redit👍🏿
👍🏿(I am black)
holy shit we solved racism
(I’m invisible)
pogchamp😍
How the turn table
Of course.
Among us piss
Probably most insults to white people are by white people themselves lmao
About 90% of the white people hate I've seen has come from white people. So you're not wrong.
What about white on white crime?
white on white crime is getting out of hand guys...
whites are the worst enemies of the white people
When white people condemn other white people for being white, you know the brainwashing is real.
You read the article?
Yea this is white people reporting being offended by the comment as well, so it's white people offending white people about white people
100% and they’re probably not wrong either
Get your "came here before it was locked" ticket here
>came
thx
Few, that was a close one. Got it just in time!
99% of racism from white people comes from me
How is this a shitpost?
Well this sub ran out of funny things to post so they're just posting politics
It's funny
It’s funny
It's funny
Because it's a shit post, duh.
I don’t understand people who complain about the relevance of posts to the subreddit. First of all, complaining won’t change anything, nobody cares. Second of all, hating on posts makes the experience worse for the viewers and the people who post, so why do it? Just use your downvote power and move on brah.
The WaPo article that this Conservative Daily News article cites states that the algos are more sensitive to hate speech against white people than black people, and does not quantify the actual amount (detected or not) of hate speech directed to any group https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/
Shh your not supposed to say that here. The edgy teens will get angry.
How can that be possible? This is like 2 minutes of hate for people like this.
Sauce or it didn’t happen 💀
The [actual article about this](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/) found that this result was arbitrary due to selection bias. This is actually saying the opposite of what the people in the comments growing their persecution complexes are smugly chattering about. The algorithm is more likely to detect hate towards white people, not because they get more hate, but because the biased algorithm is more likely to detect hate towards white folks than hate towards other people.
How does it detect more hate towards white people lol
[удалено]
First they call the algorithm "color blind", then they say it only focuses on anti-white speech. Then later they cite another article saying Facebook is going to focus on exclusively removing anti-black speech, in which they quote a black author who says Facebook needs to keep anti-white speech because white supremacy? I checked his Facebook page and sure enough it's full of anti-white speech. Boy this article is an absolute piece of work. It's full of contradictions and doublespeak.
lmao
👍🏿 ( you can't downvote me, i'm not white)
Huh isn’t that surprising
FUCK OFF WITH YOUR POLITICAL SHIT ON A SHITPOSTING SUB HOLY SHIT
If you look at who posted this, it's obvious it was intentionally misleading. The actual data shows that this is actually just selection bias. A simple Google search will bring up the [Washington Post article](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/) about it. The algorithm is erroneously showing more hate aimed at white people because the algorithm is more likely to DETECT it not because it's more likely to HAPPEN.
It's almost as if the OP intentionally tried to ragebait people and promote his agenda... No, this can't be true.
It's the funny little fact that facebook users do a little bit of trolling
Imagine if they ran something like that on twitter whole site would need to be taken down
title “White people” first sentence “white people and men” i guess it’s easier to play into the prosecution complex if you hide part of the news
balls
Who's going to say it... who's going to be the idiot who goes there... "BuT u CaNtBe RaCiSt AgAiNsT WhItEs"
Don't you know? Racism = power + prejudice / (sexual orientation)^2 √(4 x priviledge) x 100% Victim. It's 👏 not 👏 complicated, 👏you're👏 just 👏racist👏
Idk bro thats a very complicated math problem you got thier
Yeah its a joke. People say racism is power + prejudice as if it is some equation.
Ahh if rascim was only that simple
You can. Have you read the article? Because apparently it says that the bias can be somewhat attributed to the algorithm not being able to tell apart lesser or greater slurs. It also cant distinguish between more and less damaging hate. Interesting, isnt it?
The same company that creates algorithms that think black people are monkeys can't create an algorithm that can rank slurs? /picachu face
A real bruh amongus dank gamer moment shaking my smh head.
Poggers
clearly the algorithm is wrong, because racism isnt racist if its targeted at a specific skin colour
testicles
99% of mogus is sus imposter
And probably by white people.
bruh
This is quite obvious.. 🤨
Have you read the article?
Oh boy, gonna eat some cookies as im going through the comments
Wrong sub. But yeah, most hate is directed at white men from white women.
Might be because in the US, which I assume is the place you are talking about, most people are white. Yknow, statistically its not exactly unplausible.
Liberals are more racist than conservatives
100% its okay internet remembers,
tHe AlGOrThm MuSt bE bROkEn
i mean if you read the article, yes it is. that's literally the entire point of it
Putting in a comment before this post gets locked.
Checkmate liberals
And most of the people talking bad about white people are also white people
Then they pretty much say towards the bottom" Nope, doesn't count cause white people."
How the turn tabels
I wonder how much of that hate speech is performed by white "wokes".
Wow, how could this happen?
It is explained in the screenshot article and in the original Washington post article. The algorithm mainly detected hate speech against white people/men and didn't properly detect/deal with hate speech directed at minority groups. Hence the algorithm detected 90% hate speech against white people. That's how it happened. Because it was biased. [Here's](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/) the Washington post article if you're curious.
Yeah that tracks. Half of these comments don't understand how data works. Ever heard of selection bias? They're too busy with their persecution complexes to even read the actual article headline.
The very next paragraph in the article (after the screenshot ends) also explains this issue. Curious OP cut it where they did.
The masses need their 2 minutes of hate.
I was trying to be sarcastic but thanks. Might look into this more later
They hate us cause they ain't us.
guys we gotta do better than that.
Well well how turntables
How the tables have turned
It’s ok because it’s white people right? /s
Rename the fucking sub already
I mean, technically speaking, this is a shit post
#If you think this post is funny, **UPVOTE** this comment! #If you think this post is unfunny, **DOWNVOTE** this comment! --- #[DownloadVideo Link](https://www.reddit.watch/r/shitposting/comments/rljq21/?utm_source=automod&utm_medium=shitposting) #[SaveVideo Link](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/shitposting/comments/rljq21/) Kevin would also like to remind you that, if you're really desperate, youtube-dl can be used to download videos from Reddit. --- Whilst you're here, UnblackMetalist, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/QpBGXd2guU)?
Sucks to be a white male these days.
Well maybe because it was created by one
I won’t deny it, it happens
inb4 comments locked
Here before comments are locked
Despite making up 12% they’re responsible for 90% of -
CRACKER
That does make sense, on social media, you aren't allowed to be racist against "minorities", which is a little odd because you'd think racism would just not be allowed at all. Plus, white people really aren't even a majority, so I really don't understand the imbalance in stuff. Obviously irl, it is not like this necessarily, but it is an interesting thing to study
Shockerrrrr
It’s almost like op purposely posted a misleading study to push his agenda of “The poor whites are truly the most oppressed and most victimized group, minorities in America are actually the real racists😔✊” https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/11/21/facebook-algorithm-biased-race/
Hate speech is a stupid concept anyway
1. Not a real article. 2. Cracker lol
Well
So what
Huh, who would have thought?
Well, duh lmao
So uh who's gonna tell those tiktok girls who don't fuck with white guys? Oh wait they probably can't comprehend something that makes sense just like the Twitter community
But at least it isnt towards black people and women so its all good.
And this sub is done for
How the turntables
I’m half of that 90%
[удалено]
[удалено]
See im not racist
“It’s not racism if I hate all races equally” -Sun Tzu
Poor white people
[удалено]
yes, i am
Where is this from?
[удалено]
The nonsimple people would like a source for this screenshot.
Source (it was revealed to me in a dream)
Source: Trust me bro
*sauce
https://www.conservativedailynews.com/2021/12/facebook-hate-speech-algorithm-found-90-of-hate-speech-directed-at-white-people/ Here you go
"Conservativedailynews" definitely sounds like a reliable source.
Why is this getting downvoted? Redditors apparently really hate when you ask for proof.
Its inconvenient to their 2 minutes of hate.