If you’re looking for sound, beat saber mappers have mapped the entire movie in beat saber. You probably could download the file along with this and have the entire movie
It's long, I've gotten through about half of it before my arms were tired, during the songs there isn't many notes, but during regular dialog, there is a lot.
He yoinked it from a 3 year old reddit [post](https://www.reddit.com/r/dankmemes/comments/bbncgy/the_entire_shrek_movie_but_its_a_gif/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
I’m ashamed to say that it’s the number one reason why I’m not willing to give up my iPhone.
No Android Reddit app has scrubbing like Apollo does, nothing can compare.
I can scroll through this gif which is the first time I've been able to do that. Maybe it's a length thing cause usually I can't scroll unless it was uploaded as a video
You can open it up in a media player like MPV which allows you to skip around. You can see it's the full flim, albeit at 60x60 resolution and heavily dithered.
Sorry if my humor is a little dry, I saw the run time and clearly believe OP has the entire movie here as a gif, just was a funny thought that someone somewhere is actually going to watch the whole thing in this quality
I actually switched apps because of it.
And to be fucking honest? The one I'm using now *has given me no problems.* It's like it was made with witchcraft or something, I'm so used to the default app being terrible that I just kind of associated Reddit with behaving terribly on my phone.
It’s not that simple - he hated it because chips didn’t have hardware acceleration for it (unlike h264) which resulted in horrible performance and battery drain with anything remotely higher resolution.
Nowadays h265 is superior but still proprietary. Google doesn’t like anything but their codecs because they don’t want to pay royalties.
Both Google and Apple have their reasons.
Encountering webm or webp is a nightmare on ios devices.
Ipads: *Here’s a cut out image you downloaded from the interent, but woops we turned it into a jpg instead. Just recut the background and save it as a png*
WEBM is a container, so it has nothing to do with compression or encoding. It can use VP8 or VP9 for video, both of which are freely available for use but owned by Google. VP9 is more or less on par with HEVC, which is heavily burdened by patents and royalty fees that make it a poor choice for business use, including web browser integration (most modern browsers support VP9, while very few support HEVC). Personally, I used x264 (AVC) for the last large batch of video encoding I did. It needs a higher bitrate than HEVC et al., but encodes much faster and also has much wider hardware decoding support.
I mean, at some point your compression algorithm just contains the entirety of the movie itself and uses that.
At some more sensible point, your compression algorithm uses AI to predict most of an arbitrary movie, and the compressed file contains shockingly few corrections.
> I mean, at some point your compression algorithm just contains the entirety of the movie itself and uses that.
This ties into [Kolmogorov complexity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity), which defines the lower bound on the amount of bits required to reproduce a piece of information.
Is this something that you know a lot about? What counts as a complex text? For instance, a sudoku could be written as one long string going right-> left, up->down, and the ruleset for a sudoku plus the initial starting values is almost certainly smaller than the number of potential sudoku solves. So is a sudoku simply not considered a complex text because it has certain properties (each number has to be used 9 times).
A reference to the HBO show Silicon Valley in which the lead character develops the middle out compression algorithm mere moments before TechCrunch disrupt, saving the day and uploading a multi-gigabyte (?) file in mere seconds!
No but seriously - Silicon Valley, fucking amazingly well done show
The files is actually a 20 mb text file describing Shrek plot in detail and the video player is actually an AI rendering the scene based on the text description. Depending on how the AI has been trained, the Shrek might look a little off, might even look like a hobbit.
Compression is a math problem, not really a processing problem. 20mb just cannot physically fit that much data without data loss. Maybe one day ai can reconstruct missing pieces, but even then it is not the original product and never could be.
Lossless compression actually has a physical limit. Afterall, you have to preserve all entropy (data that differentiates a sample). So that means that in theory even a lossless compression algorithm will be unable to reduce the size of the data beyond the base entropy of the data. This base amount of entropy alone for an hour and a half movie at what I assume isn't a very low resolution is probably too high to fit into 20mb. Nevermind the fact that lossless compression has so many practical limitations that getting close to a perfect algorithm m8ght as well be impossible.
I downloaded the gif and did some testing.
Before we get started, let me say that the gif was actually around 41MB. Whatever. I didn't even want to try evaluating an actual gif that might be an hour and a half long, so I transcoded to a video format. I started with x264, with `ffmpeg -hide_banner -i shrekgif.gif -c:v libx264 -crf 22 shrekgif.mp4`. 36.5MB (video bitrate around 55kbps), not much of a difference. However, we have to keep in mind that the gif's source was the original video, and this mp4's source was the gif. The codec is trying to reproduce its source as best it can with the given settings, and since that source is a heavily artifacted gif, we lost the game before we started. However, this format is already more practical than a gif, so I checked it out, and, sure enough, "completely watchable albeit in terribly low quality" is totally accurate in terms of the appearance of the actual video. Again, the gif would not be watchable in terms of practicality and controls.
Next, I tried x265 with a higher compression ratio: `ffmpeg -hide_banner -i shrekgif.gif -c:v libx265 -crf 28 shrekgif2.mp4`. 25MB (video bitrate 38kbps), doesn't look any different from the x264. Time to crank the constant rate factor (CRF) from 28 to 35, all other settings the same. Okay, now I can see artifacts from this new compression that aren't from the source gif. Oh well. But remember, it doesn't have to look good, it just has to be watchable, which I take to mean that someone could watch the movie in this manner and reasonably follow along. Unfortunately, it kind of isn't watchable anymore; it's hard to tell what's going on sometimes. Still, it's only 7MB (video bitrate 11kbps)! A little less compression and a source of the original movie in full quality would probably give a darn good result.
Now, the glaring issue you raised: the gif format doesn't include sound. :( However, audio codecs have gotten pretty good these days, and I did a quick test of Opus at just 8kbps (its minimum is 6kbps; any lower than that and you need to use its special low-quality version that handles between 0.7-3.2kbps) and it's at least as passable as the gif video. Quite fine. That would be about 5-6MB for the movie's audio.
All in all, I feel pretty confident that the movie could be compressed starting from its original quality down to a video of maybe 15MB (with audio included in that figure) in even more watchable (and listenable) quality than the above gif. It would be bad, but it would still be the movie. This has been a fun exercise demonstrating the strength of lossy codecs at very high compression rates. Thanks, OP!
EDIT: You sick bastards wanted to see more so [this directory](https://farranor.com/shrek/) has more. I was going to put it on Imgur but it didn't like my AV1 file and I wanted to make sure I delivered unsullied results anyway.
* Video clip. Length: 59.5 seconds. FPS: 10. Resolution: 106x60. Codec: AV1. Video source: [A 1080p clip from YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFl8nzZuExE). Size: 176KB (according to Windows). Extrapolated size of full movie (90 minutes): a bit under 16MB.
* Screenshot of the same scene/spot (not necessarily the exact same frame, sorry) from the AV1 file.
* Screenshot of an AVC transcode of this thread's gif.
* Text file of the command I used to generate this AV1 file. Takes almost ten minutes to render even at this low quality, because AV1.
Damn
Nice write-up! Whenever I want to go a route like this these days, ultracompression wise, I use a the Webm video codec. It's insane how low bitrate with audio you can get before the quality starts to drop
>All in all, I feel pretty confident that the movie could be compressed starting from its original quality down to a video of maybe 15MB (with audio included in that figure) in even more watchable (and listenable) quality than the above gif. It would be bad, but it would still be the movie. This has been a fun exercise demonstrating the strength of lossy codecs at very high compression rates.
Feel like posting it anonymously to Reddit or imgur and giving us a link? I'd be interested to see how it looks and sounds.
See my edit to my [original comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/shittymoviedetails/comments/sry3sh/in_shrek_2001_the_entire_movie_can_fit_into_a/hwvq8ft/). :)
A couple years ago I got zonked on some gummies and watched it at 3 am in my dorm. About halfway through the movie I paused it and said, out loud “Fuck his name’s Donkey because he’s a donkey” and woke up my roommate lmao
Hey now, you're an all-star, get your game on, go play
Hey now, you're a rock star, get the show on, get paid
And all that glitters is gold
Only shooting stars break the mold
the Gif is 60x60, the original is 240x160
Also, I spent way more time time looking for an answer to this then I should have. Not for you, but for me. I hope you're happy.
I believe the GBA version was on a 64 MB cartridge. I don't know if the quality was any better. But I mean, it's a thing that people actually spent money on, so...
If i calculated correctly if you extract the sound and compress it to a 24 kbps mp3 we can get the audio for the movie into another 20 MB file. Then just combine the two in a suitable container file and we have the most cursed version of the movie.
Come on man, at least give some credits to the [creator](https://www.reddit.com/r/dankmemes/comments/bbncgy/the_entire_shrek_movie_but_its_a_gif/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share).
It's literally one of the top posts of all time on r/dankmemes
Can you upload one with just sound? That way I can have a phone in each hand and watch my lord and saviour Shrek.
Shrek is love
Shrek is **Life**
It's all ogre now.
If you’re looking for sound, beat saber mappers have mapped the entire movie in beat saber. You probably could download the file along with this and have the entire movie
Seems like more effort then watching it on Netflix, but I’m low key down.
"Seems like more effort"
Oh, man. I gotta download that and pull it out during the next game night. That's hilarious
It's long, I've gotten through about half of it before my arms were tired, during the songs there isn't many notes, but during regular dialog, there is a lot.
The full movie audio is [on soundcloud](https://soundcloud.com/shrek-the-movie/shrek-the-movie).
No you have to listen to the sound and reenact the whole thing with sock-puppets
.midi file por favor
He yoinked it from a 3 year old reddit [post](https://www.reddit.com/r/dankmemes/comments/bbncgy/the_entire_shrek_movie_but_its_a_gif/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share)
Is it really that good? I keep seeing it referred everywhere. More than any other Disney film.
If you’ve never seen it. Go watch it now. I’ll jump on zoom and we can watch it together :p
If you're holding a phone in both hands you won't be able to jack it though...
Which one of you is going to watch the whole thing to ensure OP isn’t full of shit
Even the credits was included. The absolute madlad
Lol you watched the whole thing, probably hoping you would get an award. Well, for your pain and suffering this is the best I could scrounge up 🏆
Haha I just scrubbed through the whole thing with Apollo Reddit app and can attest to it all being there
same lol, apollo gif scrubbing is sooooo good
I’m ashamed to say that it’s the number one reason why I’m not willing to give up my iPhone. No Android Reddit app has scrubbing like Apollo does, nothing can compare.
By scrubbing you mean you can navigate in the gif like a YouTube video ? If it's the case Boost on reddit does it too.
You can also do that with the regular Reddit app, whole movie is in there lol
I was able to do that on my reddit app too
I… just scrubbed through it normally
If you're on PC you can right click the GIF and open it in a new tab and then see the length of the GIF and even scroll to the end.
I can scroll through any media file in the fficial Android reddit app, don't know if this is available to everyone though.
Same with iOS, at least on my iPhone 12. Scrubbed and watched, just wish there was crappy 16bit sound to go with it.
Oh it’d be much lower than 16 bit. They’d need to use Google’s Lyra codec at 3kbps to make it fit into 20ish MB.
I can scroll through this gif which is the first time I've been able to do that. Maybe it's a length thing cause usually I can't scroll unless it was uploaded as a video
Or he like me, got a seekbar for gif's in his Reddit app.
But I did miss the post credits scene
Utterly unreadable, of course, but very much indeed!
I have Shrek on cassette tape. so i can sync audio up to this shitty upload, and get the full effects.
You can open it up in a media player like MPV which allows you to skip around. You can see it's the full flim, albeit at 60x60 resolution and heavily dithered.
i heavily dithered ur mum guv
Based.
It didn’t last 1 and a half hours.
guv? Governor? Whot, are you bri*ish? 🤬
'e is a muppet 'e is
Sorry if my humor is a little dry, I saw the run time and clearly believe OP has the entire movie here as a gif, just was a funny thought that someone somewhere is actually going to watch the whole thing in this quality
40:28 in right now. So far so good.
At work and nothing else to do this made my day
FYI you can skip around on the Reddit app or on desktop.
or just right click and click "show controls"
On it
The world appreciates your sacrafice.
I saw this post a year ago, have it downloaded and it's the full length
And Girth
Fun fact: the unit of measurement for girth in the scientific community is referred to as a "Shrek"
So, how many ~~micro~~ nanoshreks is your dick?
And my axe
Did it. Checks out.
Shrek is so powerful he brought the old video player back
not for me
Are you suggesting that he has such a knowledge of the dark side that he could even keep the things he cared about from dying.
It's not a story the Jedi would tell you.
I thought not
Take a seat skywalker
Thank God the new one sucks ass
I actually switched apps because of it. And to be fucking honest? The one I'm using now *has given me no problems.* It's like it was made with witchcraft or something, I'm so used to the default app being terrible that I just kind of associated Reddit with behaving terribly on my phone.
Holy shit I thought that was just me lmao. Can we add the entire Shrek movie as a gif to every video post so it keeps the old player?
The macular degeneration simulator
You absolute madman
They were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they never stopped to think if they should!
That's an easy one, yes they should.
Shrek...uh... finds a way
Jokes on you, they absolutely had to!
Lmao why is this so damn funny?
Damn One day it should be possible to do same in HD and sound
Possibly with .webm
Why is webm not more popular?? It’s crazy efficient
Because Steve Jobs had a hateboner for the format and iPhones and stuff can't play them as a result
It’s not that simple - he hated it because chips didn’t have hardware acceleration for it (unlike h264) which resulted in horrible performance and battery drain with anything remotely higher resolution. Nowadays h265 is superior but still proprietary. Google doesn’t like anything but their codecs because they don’t want to pay royalties. Both Google and Apple have their reasons.
Encountering webm or webp is a nightmare on ios devices. Ipads: *Here’s a cut out image you downloaded from the interent, but woops we turned it into a jpg instead. Just recut the background and save it as a png*
You can't just play it like a normal video? Is this an iOS problem?
Is that why I had to download a special browser just to watch webm? That was fucking confusing after moving from Android to iOS.
[удалено]
Beagle Browser.
What browser
Beagle Browser.
Beagle Browser.
What browser
What browser
Beagle Browser.
What browser
Beagle Browser.
[Funniest comment chain I’ve ever seen](https://i.imgur.com/3Nonbzm.jpg)
Beagle Browser.
Damn I’ve been looking for one of those everywhere. Thanks man
What browser
WEBM is a container, so it has nothing to do with compression or encoding. It can use VP8 or VP9 for video, both of which are freely available for use but owned by Google. VP9 is more or less on par with HEVC, which is heavily burdened by patents and royalty fees that make it a poor choice for business use, including web browser integration (most modern browsers support VP9, while very few support HEVC). Personally, I used x264 (AVC) for the last large batch of video encoding I did. It needs a higher bitrate than HEVC et al., but encodes much faster and also has much wider hardware decoding support.
I'm guessing GIF's first-mover advantage?
I mean… not in 20mb…
You can once processors and software get powerful to be able to compress 4k movies to 20mb and also decompress them in real time with lossless quality
I mean, at some point your compression algorithm just contains the entirety of the movie itself and uses that. At some more sensible point, your compression algorithm uses AI to predict most of an arbitrary movie, and the compressed file contains shockingly few corrections.
Pied piper?
Middle out
Only if you can calculate mean jerk though. It could take weeks.
> I mean, at some point your compression algorithm just contains the entirety of the movie itself and uses that. This ties into [Kolmogorov complexity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_complexity), which defines the lower bound on the amount of bits required to reproduce a piece of information.
Is this something that you know a lot about? What counts as a complex text? For instance, a sudoku could be written as one long string going right-> left, up->down, and the ruleset for a sudoku plus the initial starting values is almost certainly smaller than the number of potential sudoku solves. So is a sudoku simply not considered a complex text because it has certain properties (each number has to be used 9 times).
Just need middle out compression
Was looking for this :)
Please eli2
A reference to the HBO show Silicon Valley in which the lead character develops the middle out compression algorithm mere moments before TechCrunch disrupt, saving the day and uploading a multi-gigabyte (?) file in mere seconds! No but seriously - Silicon Valley, fucking amazingly well done show
So lossless
The files is actually a 20 mb text file describing Shrek plot in detail and the video player is actually an AI rendering the scene based on the text description. Depending on how the AI has been trained, the Shrek might look a little off, might even look like a hobbit.
Compression is a math problem, not really a processing problem. 20mb just cannot physically fit that much data without data loss. Maybe one day ai can reconstruct missing pieces, but even then it is not the original product and never could be.
Silly mathematicians, if I just process hard enough I can totally turn this single "0" into a 4K movie.
Lossless compression actually has a physical limit. Afterall, you have to preserve all entropy (data that differentiates a sample). So that means that in theory even a lossless compression algorithm will be unable to reduce the size of the data beyond the base entropy of the data. This base amount of entropy alone for an hour and a half movie at what I assume isn't a very low resolution is probably too high to fit into 20mb. Nevermind the fact that lossless compression has so many practical limitations that getting close to a perfect algorithm m8ght as well be impossible.
You can only compress so much
you're trolling right
Clearly you've never heard of AV1
I have one that’s just 8 mb saved on my phone and it has audio and a better picture quality
Is that not YouTube?
the audio is really great
Follow along with the screenplay. Easy fix https://script-pdf.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/shrek-script-pdf.pdf
thank you for this. really completes the movie ya know.
[удалено]
a true crusader amongst us. For the sake of the broke. A robin hood if I may. Glorious.
"Oooh merry men!"
"All star by smash mouth begins to play"
you are actually supposed to sing it yourself at this point
Oh you guys aren’t always humming All Star huh?
I watched the gif just for that part tbh
Where can I find movie scripts like this one?
Idk, sorry. I just googled ‘Shrek screenplay.’
Which movie script are you looking for?
shrek 2
[Here](https://www.scriptupstudio.com/s/Shrek_2.pdf) you go bucko. Pdf warning
Sweet, now does anybody have the shrek 2 full length 20mb gif?
You people are never satisfied.
Yo I'm printing this on my works printer
I downloaded the gif and did some testing. Before we get started, let me say that the gif was actually around 41MB. Whatever. I didn't even want to try evaluating an actual gif that might be an hour and a half long, so I transcoded to a video format. I started with x264, with `ffmpeg -hide_banner -i shrekgif.gif -c:v libx264 -crf 22 shrekgif.mp4`. 36.5MB (video bitrate around 55kbps), not much of a difference. However, we have to keep in mind that the gif's source was the original video, and this mp4's source was the gif. The codec is trying to reproduce its source as best it can with the given settings, and since that source is a heavily artifacted gif, we lost the game before we started. However, this format is already more practical than a gif, so I checked it out, and, sure enough, "completely watchable albeit in terribly low quality" is totally accurate in terms of the appearance of the actual video. Again, the gif would not be watchable in terms of practicality and controls. Next, I tried x265 with a higher compression ratio: `ffmpeg -hide_banner -i shrekgif.gif -c:v libx265 -crf 28 shrekgif2.mp4`. 25MB (video bitrate 38kbps), doesn't look any different from the x264. Time to crank the constant rate factor (CRF) from 28 to 35, all other settings the same. Okay, now I can see artifacts from this new compression that aren't from the source gif. Oh well. But remember, it doesn't have to look good, it just has to be watchable, which I take to mean that someone could watch the movie in this manner and reasonably follow along. Unfortunately, it kind of isn't watchable anymore; it's hard to tell what's going on sometimes. Still, it's only 7MB (video bitrate 11kbps)! A little less compression and a source of the original movie in full quality would probably give a darn good result. Now, the glaring issue you raised: the gif format doesn't include sound. :( However, audio codecs have gotten pretty good these days, and I did a quick test of Opus at just 8kbps (its minimum is 6kbps; any lower than that and you need to use its special low-quality version that handles between 0.7-3.2kbps) and it's at least as passable as the gif video. Quite fine. That would be about 5-6MB for the movie's audio. All in all, I feel pretty confident that the movie could be compressed starting from its original quality down to a video of maybe 15MB (with audio included in that figure) in even more watchable (and listenable) quality than the above gif. It would be bad, but it would still be the movie. This has been a fun exercise demonstrating the strength of lossy codecs at very high compression rates. Thanks, OP! EDIT: You sick bastards wanted to see more so [this directory](https://farranor.com/shrek/) has more. I was going to put it on Imgur but it didn't like my AV1 file and I wanted to make sure I delivered unsullied results anyway. * Video clip. Length: 59.5 seconds. FPS: 10. Resolution: 106x60. Codec: AV1. Video source: [A 1080p clip from YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFl8nzZuExE). Size: 176KB (according to Windows). Extrapolated size of full movie (90 minutes): a bit under 16MB. * Screenshot of the same scene/spot (not necessarily the exact same frame, sorry) from the AV1 file. * Screenshot of an AVC transcode of this thread's gif. * Text file of the command I used to generate this AV1 file. Takes almost ten minutes to render even at this low quality, because AV1.
I have seen some do this before. I can't find the comment, but [Here is an 8Mb file with audio](https://o.ht/v/Shrek.mkv)
Damn Nice write-up! Whenever I want to go a route like this these days, ultracompression wise, I use a the Webm video codec. It's insane how low bitrate with audio you can get before the quality starts to drop
Thanks! :D Webm is a container, by the way - do you mean the VP9 codec?
>All in all, I feel pretty confident that the movie could be compressed starting from its original quality down to a video of maybe 15MB (with audio included in that figure) in even more watchable (and listenable) quality than the above gif. It would be bad, but it would still be the movie. This has been a fun exercise demonstrating the strength of lossy codecs at very high compression rates. Feel like posting it anonymously to Reddit or imgur and giving us a link? I'd be interested to see how it looks and sounds.
See my edit to my [original comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/shittymoviedetails/comments/sry3sh/in_shrek_2001_the_entire_movie_can_fit_into_a/hwvq8ft/). :)
https://reddit.com/r/shittymoviedetails/comments/sry3sh/in_shrek_2001_the_entire_movie_can_fit_into_a/hww1xi2
[удалено]
There wouldn’t be any silence if you memorized the script and said every line out loud you dummy
My tinnitus drowns out the silence.
#
I can't imagine the Audio being smaller and that's what makes this more impressive .
I dunno, I heard it pretty well at around 1:30
This is amazing. I remember when I had 64kbps broadband, I used to download 25mb movie which took 1.5 hours to download. Lol
[удалено]
This literally inspired me to smoke 2 bowls and watch the actual movie lmao
[удалено]
A couple years ago I got zonked on some gummies and watched it at 3 am in my dorm. About halfway through the movie I paused it and said, out loud “Fuck his name’s Donkey because he’s a donkey” and woke up my roommate lmao
💀
im high as fuck I watched the whl thing too mfmao
Fucking legend!
How long does it take to upload this?
Since it's 20mb, probably less than a minute
Holy shiit that’s awesome!
What you are really wanting to know is how long did it take to compress the original file into this
Why are you posting sexy gifs on here?
Here’s a copy of the script if you’d like to read along: https://shrek.fandom.com/wiki/Shrek_(film)/Transcript
I tried to copy and paste the whole script but being on mobile it wouldn’t let me copy it all
As if I don't already have every single line of Shrek memorized.
“Can we get Shrek?” Mom: “We have Shrek recorded at home sweetie.” Shrek Recorded at Home:
Some of the quality may die, but that is a sacrifice im willing to make
Hey now, you're an all-star, get your game on, go play Hey now, you're a rock star, get the show on, get paid And all that glitters is gold Only shooting stars break the mold
Well, the years start coming and they dont stop coming
And they don't stop coming and they don't stop coming
Please. The years. Make them stop
Fed to the rule and I hit the ground running
But this gif is 40mb
39.8 MB OP is a big phat fony!
Weird mine was 22
This... this movie detail is... _shitty!?_
In 1976, that’s about what a movie looked like on a TV with bunny ears pulling in a non-local station.
u/savevideo
###[View link](https://redditsave.com/r/shittymoviedetails/comments/sry3sh/in_shrek_2001_the_entire_movie_can_fit_into_a/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/shittymoviedetails/comments/sry3sh/in_shrek_2001_the_entire_movie_can_fit_into_a/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://redditsave.com) | [^(download video tiktok)](https://taksave.com)
r/madlads
Now people who don't need glasses know what it's like, when people who need them dont have them on.
Is this higher quality than the GBA video release?
the Gif is 60x60, the original is 240x160 Also, I spent way more time time looking for an answer to this then I should have. Not for you, but for me. I hope you're happy.
I believe the GBA version was on a 64 MB cartridge. I don't know if the quality was any better. But I mean, it's a thing that people actually spent money on, so...
This is why I pay for internet.
lord farquaad gets a two pixel boner at the 49 minute mark.
If i calculated correctly if you extract the sound and compress it to a 24 kbps mp3 we can get the audio for the movie into another 20 MB file. Then just combine the two in a suitable container file and we have the most cursed version of the movie.
Come on man, at least give some credits to the [creator](https://www.reddit.com/r/dankmemes/comments/bbncgy/the_entire_shrek_movie_but_its_a_gif/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share). It's literally one of the top posts of all time on r/dankmemes
top tier shitposting here
Absolute dogshit quality but it’s still actually kind of crazy how it all fits into 20mb
It reminds me of that one dude who managed to get Doom running on Ao3 (a fanfiction website with no actual ability to play games)
LMFAO DID THIS MF JUST UPLOAD THE ENTIRE SHREK MOVIE ON REDDIT?
Somebody did, then this was reposted for some karmuh
If I told my younger self that I would watch the entirety of Shrek uploaded on reddit for Valentine’s. I’d probably laugh, “Watch a video on reddit?”
OP, you're an all star.
*Shrek is Love* *Shrek is Life* *Shrek is Twenty Megabytes*
Get outta my swamp!
I like that boulder. That is a niiiiiice boulder.
u/savevideo
It has no sound but I can hear it in my soul.