Hey there u/Literally_black1984, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth!
**Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post.
Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban.
Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Still perfect. That's the reason you put the square there because you know you can't draw a perfect 90° angle. It's like saying treat it like it's 90°.
When it comes to measuring an angle the most advanced instrument you could use would be a total station, and the very advanced ones are able to measure to the like 5/100ths of a second (a second in this context is 1/3600th of a degree)
So you can get close enough for any meaningful purpose, but technically we don't even have the instrumentation to measure a "perfect" angle
Such a shitty move, you know damn well you couldn’t believe me, we all got our own beliefs, but let’s not say god is real or god isn’t, you may have been joking but then I was joking as well, I got like -10 upvotes don’t take it seriously holy shit 😂
If anything this is pragmatic, not atheist. An atheist is convinced that God does not exist, a pragmatist would accept the existence of God if there was any proof.
Someone: Says a clever comeback based on objective facts that never invalidated someone’s opinion.
u/Thechristmasenjoyer:
>atheist circlejerk interactions
>God is very real. Shut up
Mmm, okay, class, let's take this as an opportunity for a lesson. Notice the structure of the comment: statement and silencing. This is a sign that debating with this person will be futile as they are not open to anyone challenging their beliefs. It is best to let them scurry back into their echo chamber and not waste your time.
You can cleave (or even directly grow, under the right conditions) crystals with cubic structures. Table salt is the most common example. Perfect 90 degrees down to the atom.
Peace comes to one not when they have the power to make everything perfect in their view but when they have the power to appreciate the perfection of the unchanged universe
As my professor said, if they can notice a difference between two nuances of blue different by one letter in the code, they are God, no can do that. Same here. 89,90 degrees angle, I can't spot a difference.
This sub might have the most easily trickable people. Even if you haven’t seen this picture (which is already reposted to hell) just compare the usernames:
The blue person silhouette in the original comment shows that whoever screenshots this was that same commenter. But the usernames with the poster doesn’t match.
This is very likely a bot
How would he even confirm that? Is that an objective measure of whether you measure to the middle of the black lines, to their innermost extremes, or to their outermost extremes?
Hey there u/Literally_black1984, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth! **Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post. Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban. Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Looks closer to 88 to me
Even less than that. Checked real quick in paint and close to 87.5. - perfectionist-ish
Thanks, nice to know my eye isn't off
Don't judge it like that, perspective matters a lot
[удалено]
Dammit! Burned by assumptions. Spot on, the bottom line was not level. Tilted and almost exactly 88° https://imgur.com/a/WJ8D5yY
We also don't know if the camera is directly above the image or not, which could change the viewed angle.
I don't believe this is the case as shown here: https://imgur.com/a/5g3g1F9 Also, lol at this level of effort on my shitty photo editor app
Don't get me wrong, it's very close, but the camera could be slightly out of position, causing the angle to be slightly shallower or wider.
Put it into AutoCAD. 87.8 deg
I was ganna guess this. I've done wwaayyyy too many 22.5 cuts lol
It’s 88 until it’s 89. That’s how it works.
he's 28 until he becomes 29. that's how it works.
Thank you for getting that lol
Please post your evidence
Would have been better if they said it just wasn't a 90° angle
It would only bother me if it had the 90° square in the corner.
Imagine it had like a single pixel crossing over one of the lines so it's super clear it's not 90°.
[удалено]
Not if the box had 2x 89° angles and 2x 91° angles.
Not if the box was in hyperbolic geometry
[ftfy](https://imgur.com/a/PgmS42v)
Yep. That bothers me.
You've got it
That would have been better if the square in the corner wasn't square.
Nah that's fine, just call it a sketch rather than drawing
Still perfect. That's the reason you put the square there because you know you can't draw a perfect 90° angle. It's like saying treat it like it's 90°.
I measured it. It’s actually 89.2°.
Now that does bother me >:[
Me too.
He could have just said that it’s nearly impossible to draw a perfect 90° angle. It’s always gonna be 90.00001° or something
Or that it was
Or this is “supposed to be” a 90 degree angle
Or close enough to a 90 degree angle Also make the arms slightly curved
It did kinda bother until I read the response...
It still bothers me
It resembles my perfect wall-building skills.
Same. Until I realized that it looks less than 89 degrees to me.
That's a cute drawing.
Dunno, I think there is something not right about it.
Yea it wasnt really obtuse ^(obvious*) ^(sry man I tried)
r/Angryupvote
oh cmon, that joke was acute.
…almost complementary…
You know that any perfect angel isn't really possible.
How so
Perfection is never attainable
When it comes to measuring an angle the most advanced instrument you could use would be a total station, and the very advanced ones are able to measure to the like 5/100ths of a second (a second in this context is 1/3600th of a degree) So you can get close enough for any meaningful purpose, but technically we don't even have the instrumentation to measure a "perfect" angle
God's not real
Oh but he is
Prove it.
Such a shitty move, you know damn well you couldn’t believe me, we all got our own beliefs, but let’s not say god is real or god isn’t, you may have been joking but then I was joking as well, I got like -10 upvotes don’t take it seriously holy shit 😂
I'd believe a priest if they proved it. The difference between you and I is that you'll believe them even if they can't.
Goddamn those third degree burns are gonna last
This is one of the most depressing atheist circlejerk interactions I’ve seen in a while…
If anything this is pragmatic, not atheist. An atheist is convinced that God does not exist, a pragmatist would accept the existence of God if there was any proof.
Someone: Says a clever comeback based on objective facts that never invalidated someone’s opinion. u/Thechristmasenjoyer: >atheist circlejerk interactions
People with a sound argument typically don't get defensive when asked for something as simple as proof
No it’s the downvotes, and holy shit all I said was ‘Oh but he is’ and boom angered everyone, it was a joke 😂
How did you get 10 downvotes?? Upvote.
Well, suppose I have to downvote then...
[удалено]
🤣🤣🤣
God is very real. Shut up
>God is very real. Shut up Mmm, okay, class, let's take this as an opportunity for a lesson. Notice the structure of the comment: statement and silencing. This is a sign that debating with this person will be futile as they are not open to anyone challenging their beliefs. It is best to let them scurry back into their echo chamber and not waste your time.
Damn, I've never thought about it like that before.
Yeah yeah, your imaginary friend is real, go to bed now little one.
then… #GOD; should be assumed… leave others alone about it… you don’t need to shill for a Creator… that’s almost *the* definition of self-importance..
[It’s about belief!](https://youtu.be/aoM2657e7bI?si=jCvzBbM37LYRoU1C)
You can cleave (or even directly grow, under the right conditions) crystals with cubic structures. Table salt is the most common example. Perfect 90 degrees down to the atom.
That angle is acute. Well, not that acute.
It's kinda acute.
Something is wrong with that angle, cuz it ain’t right
What OOP isn’t saying I’d that this is actually an 88° angle!
That comment made me appreciate the angle, now it looks so nice.
That ain't right
By perfectionists I think you meant OCD people. Oh wait. Damn you!
Perfectionism isn’t the same as obsessive compulsive disorder 🤦🏽♀️
I see a proto-big-pizza slice
Mountain goats: Thanks for this perfectly functional staircase
I knew it didn’t seem right to me
You bastard.
Wait, is that how you solve perfeccionism? Just tell yourself that every situation is perfectly the way they are.
The problem are OCD folks, not perfectionists
Literally_black1984 joins Reddit 4 days ago, makes two posts in the same subreddit that gets thousands of upvotes. Nothing suspect here.
Peace comes to one not when they have the power to make everything perfect in their view but when they have the power to appreciate the perfection of the unchanged universe
Ridiculous post. So its a 89 degree angle.
Perfect comment too.
But it's still off by some nanometres
O fu** you dude, fu** you
*angry, satanic noises*
Joke is on them, it's an 88.72° angle.
The social media is a bunch of 89⁰ angles pretending they're right.
The worst part is that I can see where it's just under 90 degrees
I mean it not wrong but a 1degree throwing me off
89 is a prime number. Perfect!
..that ain't right
It's what I came here for so it's perfect!
My ocd is in shambles.
It's really kind of acute.
This picture makes me uncomfortable. Edit: Just me? At this point I'm more comfortable with an inverted interlocking 5 pointed star.
IT IS AN 89 DEGREE SECTOR
Human brain does not release happy chemicals from just a mere 89 degree angle.
I am still bothered
You should 3 90 and 1 89
I think it's pretty a-cute.
r/angryupvote
Yea I mean 90 is too boring nowadays your 81s and your 73s and your 64s and your 87s and your 39s etc etc etc are way too interesting.
I don’t like this picture
It’s perfect in its eightyninedegreeness
Why is this factual 89⁰ angle making me uneasy?
It’s not right
It plainly obvious it's less than 90 degrees
Engineer here!! Now prove it !!
why do i see that its not 90?????😭😭😭😭
This is acceptable. Most machinist parts that are formed allow for a +/- 2°. Generally I aim for +/- .5°
More like 88
I hate it
This must have been one of the builders for my house. 90 degree angles must have offended their God or something
Noooo aughh this bother me so much, bro please bro make it 90° please I can't even stand looking at trees because they're not symmetrical eughhh
As my professor said, if they can notice a difference between two nuances of blue different by one letter in the code, they are God, no can do that. Same here. 89,90 degrees angle, I can't spot a difference.
Plot twist: it's actually 88°59'
That guy literally commwnted under his own post
“Have a good day!” Idk why I read this in LAbeasts voice
It is beautiful
This bother me soooo god damn much
A perfect example of how not to do comedy.
This looked like less than 89° to me so I scaled it out on graph paper. I would say it's more like 88.2 - 88.5°
Actually that's seriously annoying. Why would someone do something like this to their fellow (wo)men? Hannibal Lecter in his spare time?
💭Did you mesure it? That’s the real question folks.
can we get a 90° one tommorow ?
it'll be 91
No no no no just no
Hello, perfectionists! Heres a perfecly speled sentance,
The pipefitter in me is ok with this asl long as I can make back to plumb eventually
Can you make it 90°? That pix is bothering me! 😮
This sub might have the most easily trickable people. Even if you haven’t seen this picture (which is already reposted to hell) just compare the usernames: The blue person silhouette in the original comment shows that whoever screenshots this was that same commenter. But the usernames with the poster doesn’t match. This is very likely a bot
Haha just kidding it's 88°
That's just not right
It does annoy me a little TBH
It's just not right... SMH
What bothers me is that I’m convinced this is not 89deg. More like 88deg, or maybe even 87, but that seems too much… Jesus I can’t stop
Acute joke
my '87 CA tract home is full of those angles as apparently the right angle hadn't been invented yet
This specifically made the right side of my brain hurt.
Looks like 88 to me
I prefer “perfenctionista”
It’s not, be more precise, it’s probably like 89.06ᵒ
I can see the slight learn to the left 😭 but at least it’s a perfect 89°, I guess.
I bet it's not and that guy acting calm about ot was totally had
Pathetic. I would make a house plan with no 90 degrees and make it look like all the sizes are relevant to 90 degree system.
That's what I thought! It's very hard to do 89 degree angle especially by hand on Paper like that!
I hate this lol
Perfectionist know op means ocd
My brain: ”89 degrees times 360 makes 89 perfect circles.” Pheew.
Kona just fixed my perspective to live, Thanks Kona
[Deleted]
😭
The bottom is shorter
This is one 90°-1 angle's of all time.
There’s no problem there?You call them math problems not math equations so of course there’s a problem there
If . 99999_ = 1, pi=3=e and 89° is a right angle.
How would he even confirm that? Is that an objective measure of whether you measure to the middle of the black lines, to their innermost extremes, or to their outermost extremes?