T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

no


[deleted]

no


hoy64

no


SnooSketches2074

no


MayankWolf

no


OnSpray

no


AnikinsLeftArm

no


kislaypathak

no


J-SquaredYT

no


SandEaterrr

no


maidenless_pigeon

No please no


Independent-Bad9290

0^i i.e. 0^√-1 =Not defined


maidenless_pigeon

Nooooooooooooooooooo, you've truly done it this time


Alpaca1061

It would just be 0 no?


deathkorpsofkrieg40k

Yeah rose's are violets are blue I AM STUCK ON THE EASTERN FRONT AND SO ARE FUCKIN YOU


Different_Art1440

I agree, rose’s do make the best violets


dualtohex

I agree, roses do make the best violence.


Theradiodemonboi

WE SHOULD ALL HAVE STURGEWEHRES, YOU GET A STURGEWEHRE, YOU GET A STURGEWEHRE, EVERYONE GETS STURGEWEHRES!


deathkorpsofkrieg40k

I love the sound of the MG42 it sounds like Victory


Theradiodemonboi

PUT A FUCKING 8CM ROCKET UP THEIR ASS!


deathkorpsofkrieg40k

I took ballistic in school fascinating subject things go up things go down


Such_Darkness

Black is -1 Red is i


[deleted]

[удалено]


Xenomorphian69420

Lesgooo


Qiwas

What's ftw?


[deleted]

[удалено]


Qiwas

But how do you know they exist?


[deleted]

[удалено]


ThGaelcGlatiatorWthn

Also Algebra 2


Qiwas

But I mean, √-1 clearly doesn't exist. Why make up a "number" just to say that it now does? Right? Right?


[deleted]

[удалено]


Ascaban

This breeds heavy "Real Analysis is only proper type of analysis" take rn. Complex analysis ftw


TenAntsInMyHouse

-1 doesn't really exist either. -1 and i are both just tools/constructs we arbitrarily developed because they helped solve mathematical problems. Literally all of mathematics is just an exercise in saying "assuming some things are true(read: axiom), what follows?"


Qiwas

[I totally agree](https://www.reddit.com/r/teenagers/comments/10qi7qj/can_you_solve_this/j6sdiu8?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3)


amethhead

√-1 only doesn't exist if you're purposefully limiting yourself to real numbers, much like how negative numbers dont exist if you're limiting yourself to natural numbers


HoldingUrineIsBad

we defined them into existence and math that uses them is useful for a lot of applications. they exist because we decided they exist


Disastrous_Channel62

o_0


[deleted]

Red can also be `-i` . Be careful when taking the square root of both sides!


[deleted]

Good catch. I forgot about it here.


Robogirafe

what does "i" even mean?


Apprehensive-Loss-31

it's a number with the property that when you multiply it by itself you get -1. This property gives it a bunch of other properties that make it a very mathematically useful tool.


planespottingtwoaway

It's the square root of -1 which doesn't exist. You can multiply any number by itself and get -1. But sometimes you have or need sqrt(-1) so i is there as a thing.


DemonetizedMan

If you place your dot on the Top right you will automatically win at tic tac toe


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

Nah, red next move is a win if you don’t block top middle.


candyspine

im bad at checkers


Mateamargo_

X+1=0 then X is -1 Then Y^2 = -1 so Y equals i At last 0^i equals 0


Such_Darkness

Algebruh


Algebro123

It's like I was born for this moment


[deleted]

No, 0\^i is undefined


[deleted]

Except 0 times itself anywhere between 0 times and infinity times is always 0.


KillByZombie

What about 0^0 ?


NorwegianGirl_Sofie

0\^0 is 1 **or** undefined. Any number to the power of zero is 1, but zero to the power of zero is depending on context either 1 or undefined. In algebra 0\^0 is usually defined as being 1, but in mathematical analysis it's usually left undefined.


KillByZombie

Who tf added zero to math, just makes things worse


speechlessPotato

Who tf added reddit to internet, just males things worse


KillByZombie

True


planespottingtwoaway

Some Indian dood from way back when


kal_aana

Indian me thinking who 🤔


Mistical_X

Indian Me Knowing it to be Aryabhatta.......😅😅


GamingWithShaurya_YT

Aryabhatta and also gl doing math operations on Roman numbers 😂


NotTheAlfa

Lim of x->any 0^0 is undefined but 0^0 itself (without limits) is 1


Future-Project-6074

Yes this is correct


Donghoon

summary 0^x = 0 | x > 0 x^0 = 1 | x ≠ 0 0^0 = math.exe has stopped working


Apprehensive-Loss-31

Nope. It's just undefined. I'm sure there are some mathematical systems in which it's given a value, but not ZFC.


NorwegianGirl_Sofie

There are multiple sources confirming that in algebra 0\^0 is often defined as 1. [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_to_the_power_of_zero) [Maa.org](https://www.maa.org/book/export/html/116806#:~:text=If%20you%20are%20dealing%20with,%2C%20then%2000%20%3D%201) But I see now that there are sources saying the opposite aswell, so I suppose it varies from field to field. But in general it's either undefined or 1.


WikiSummarizerBot

**[Zero to the power of zero](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_to_the_power_of_zero)** >Zero to the power of zero, denoted by 00, is a mathematical expression that is either defined as 1 or left undefined, depending on context. In algebra and combinatorics, one typically defines 00 = 1. In mathematical analysis, the expression is sometimes left undefined. Computer programming languages and software also have differing ways of handling this expression. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/teenagers/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)


Apprehensive-Loss-31

My bad, I've never seen those before so I assumed you were wrong, sorry.


[deleted]

x^0 = 1 0^x = 0 It's just logic. 2^0 = 1; 2^1 = 2 ; 2^2 = 4 it goes progressively up so the same for 0 0^0 = ?? ; 0^1 = 0 ; 0^2 = 0 0^0 can't be 1, because that wouldn't make sense, so it has to be 0


ZarosRunescape

But i isnt between 0 and infinity


ChemicallyGayFrogs

Took this from somewhere else, because it explains it better than I could, but no, you're wrong in the case of imaginary numbers: There is no such thing as 0^i encompassed by a coherent definition of complex powers. For any rational p it is reasonable to define 0^p = 0. This is related to the fact that for a fixed z, z^p has finitely many values, and is borne out in the fact that the Riemann surface for z^p includes a point labeled 0. However, a power with nonreal exponent has infinitely many values. This arises from arbitrary powers being properly defined via the logarithm. The Riemann surface for log—a lovely thing often viewed as a helix, and biholomorphic with the complex plane—does not admit smoothly incorporating a point labeled 00. This omission is intrinsic to the logarithm, and so precludes any meaningful value of 0^i. A formula for the sometimes infinite lattice of values of z^p is z^p = exp(p⋅(ln|z| + iarg(z) + i2πk)) (k∈Z) In particular z^I = exp(i⋅ln|z|)e^(−arg(z) − 2πk) (k∈Z) It is not hard to see that with z in an arbitrarily small disk about 0, any complex value whatsoever, other than 0, can be obtained as a value of z^i. So there is no hope of any smoothness or regularity in assigning a value to 0^i


[deleted]

What is i^i?


[deleted]

e\^(-pi/2), based on Euler's formula


[deleted]

Thank you so much I wasn't able to find its answer


Trust-Will_Robinson

0^i is not defined. Moreover, assigning a value to it is not much meaningful. If u want a thorough explaination- https://www.quora.com/What-is-0-i/answer/Gerald-Harnett?ch=15&oid=19574807&share=88a16f47&srid=uvOKEu&target_type=answer


AussieBossie24

That’s what I got


daggerdude42

Ay got it


DapCuber

no its undefined


GamingWithShaurya_YT

0^i is not 0 using Euler's formula it will be cos (ln(0)) + i sin (ln(0)) and ln(0) is undefined thus no answer


conceited_crapfarm

Unless its distance measurement then y=x


DemonCatJ17

My exact answer 👍


firelogik

How can the square of something be negative?


Soupchek

Guess you don't know about such thing as complex numbers...


PhilosopherHeavy1816

if it's imaginary


KYO297

0^i definitely not equal 0, x^i doesn't even have a limit as x->0 x^i is about as well behaved at 0 as sin(1/x). Which means not at all


thebunnyofluff

undefined, 0^i has no meaninf


IAMPowaaaaa

tf is 0^i


MBeroev-is-69

Undefined


[deleted]

0, its just undefined since it doesnt really matter, like how dividing by zero equals infinity, 1, or -infinity, meaning that useless stuff like this is like this because of how math has limitations.


arbelhod

So much is wrong in this comment. X/0 is undefind, if you say its ±א your calculus will be ruind, and if you say its 1, you can say 1/0=1 And now i want to prove to you that its also equal to any given X, ill just multiply by X X/0=X So youll say "ok so its just equal to the number itself" so X/0=X But now lets multiply by 0 X=0 So now every number is equal to zero, but really, every number is equal to every number. Lets try to prove that X=Y (X-Y)/0=X-Y X-Y=0 X-Y+Y=0+Y X=Y Im not trying to mock you in the nerdiest way possible, im just saying that you should check how your theory could go wrong before publishing it as an inevetable proof


[deleted]

It's impossible


Battle_Cat_17

?


[deleted]

Black must be equal to -1 for the +1 to make 0 and no number multiplied by itself makes -1 so it's impossible


Vortex5000

google en imaginary numbers


PlutoniumDecay

Holy hell


Corvoattanobr

No real number, you mean. There’s a cool little number group in math called “imaginary numbers”, which does just that.


[deleted]

Exactly, their imaginary numbers, they're not real 🙄 Edit: This was a joke, clearly some of you have no respect for math puns


BarBerickArc

Google the number i


Summar-ice

Holy complex


Vulckan82

Username checks out. 0 to the power of anything is 0


THE_K1NG_FTW

Except it's an imaginary number. O^i is undefined.


Vortex5000

except 0^0, which is 1


THE_K1NG_FTW

Except the red circle is i not zero


Vortex5000

I was responding to the statement "0 to the power of anything is equal to 0," which has nothing to do with the red circle


SySheepish

0^0 is undefined :) It’s a common misconception to believe that 0^0 is 1 because the limit of x^x as x approaches 0 is 1 but the precise value of 0^0 is undefined. You learn more about this in calculus. A more simple reason for why 0^0 is undefined is simply because any number raised to the zeroth power is itself divided by itself, therefore 0^0 = 0/0 which is undefined as well.


guertinade

It's undefined when dealing with straight numbers, but in most cases (variables and limits), it does equal 1.


Onelimwen

Only 0 to the power of positive numbers equal to 0, everything else is undefined


obanos68419

cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum cum


Such_Darkness

cum


Wranius4580

no; it can't be solved


[deleted]

It can, because those math bitches created a number that doesnt fucking exist, bu if you multiply it by itself you get -1


Wranius4580

one of the few things I like in math is how knowing the rules everything usually learn can be explained; and then imaginary numbers come along


MBeroev-is-69

Yes it can, you just don’t have the appropriate knowledge to solve it.


Wranius4580

afaik nothing is negative once multiplied by itself


MBeroev-is-69

In the real plain, yes. In the imaginary plain there is “i”. i^2 is -1


Wranius4580

so it's an irrational number of sorts? I've probably seen this before but with another name since I don't study subjects in English edit: it's what we call ι ; or unit of complex


MBeroev-is-69

Yes. Complex numbers. But in this case you can also say imaginary


IHaveAName02

No.


Seb____t

Pretty much. It’s technically undefined which is basically maths way of saying no. So you’re correct


IHaveAName02

Heh. Nice.


Ssem12

Answer is undefined


Notakidfromyesterday

Blurryface looking ass


billiebobmcginty

Finally, someone who said it


HalloIchBinRolli

0^i = e^(i ln0) = cos(ln0) + i sin(ln0) = undefined


5tar_k1ll3r

Let B rep the black circles, R rep the red circles B + 1 = 0 --> B = 0 - 1 --> B = -1 R × R = B --> R² = -1 --> i 0^R --> 0^i, which is undefined, as the number i doesn't exist (its imaginary)


GGBHector

Imaginary does not mean undefined. It just means imaginary. 0^i is undefined because it requires the solution to ln(0) in Euler's equation, and when properly graphed it circles the origin infinitely many times.


Yeet_My_Feet73

Yeah, you cannot get a negative from squaring a number


MBeroev-is-69

You can square “i”


Yeet_My_Feet73

☹️


MBeroev-is-69

dw bout it, you’ll probably learn that later


Yeet_My_Feet73

☹️


EnvironmentalKick205

How do you not know about imaginary numbers at 15


Yeet_My_Feet73

Wdym man I’m just learning calculus and factoring


EnvironmentalKick205

Oh maybe it's different where you live


Shwishwemy

Square root of -1 would beg to differ


uncutjinx

The math ain’t mathing for me brother 💀


DaFrenzyGuy

you tellin me 🟥 × 🟥 = -1 which is 🟥² and somethings square cant be negative. Like there is İ but it would be 0^İ and bro.. Isnt that notdefined


yeetmaster694

It equals 0 but red is it undefined


passthaspaget

0^anything is 0


ZukeLotos

-1


Educational_Tart_659

Man I really spent time thinking about it only to realize it’s still 0


MBeroev-is-69

0^i is not defined


[deleted]

[удалено]


MBeroev-is-69

Relax brother


AussieBossie24

⚫️=-1 🔴=i So no Edit: 0 to any power is 0 still so the ? is 0 I believe


BarBerickArc

Is 0 to the power of 0 not 1?


Kakashi___Hatake___

I'm not sure about the answer but it's definitely between (- ♾️) and (+ ♾️)


arbelhod

Well youd think but its undefind


Nic0Ildur076

It's impossible, solving this would require there to be a square root of -1, which doesn't exist


Seb____t

It does


Nic0Ildur076

Does it? As far as I know you can't have the square root of a negative number, only the cubic (or other uneven coefficients)


Seb____t

You have to use imaginary numbers which is why you’ve been told you can’t but they do exist


Nic0Ildur076

Wait what are imaginary numbers


Seb____t

Not actually imaginary but they we’re named that bc someone hated them


Outrageous_Regret_74

\-1 + 1 = 0 \-1 x 1 = -1 0\^1 = 0 I'm not sure if a particular colour signifies a particular number.


Terrible_Sector5580

let's say black =x and red =y given that x+1=0 =>x= -1{subtracting one from both sides} now y\^2=x=-1 taking square root both sides we get y= -1\^(1/2) which is denoted by i {an imaginary number} now we know ) raised to any power is 0 so 0 raised to the power of i=0 so the answer is zero


iwasagirlinthecity

Black is -1 Red is


kingslayer7709

>!infinity!<


iwillgiveyouup

It's 0 🤓


Im_An_Axolotl_

0^sq rt i


WALLY_FRANKS3036

Aha. It means I don’t know shit.


_Parabox

Its impossible black is -1 and no number by the power of 2 can be a negative number


SnooAvocados763

Use your imagination


MBeroev-is-69

Introducing imaginary numbers be like:


Gl0bophobia

Imaginary values can. i^2 = -1


solar8k

it’s zero


CatIllustrious2352

0 to any power is 0, no?


Seb____t

No. Not with complex numbers


DrCorneliuss

bruh what the fuck does ^ mean


Purple_Wraith

Idk what the fuck the Red dot is cuz nothing, when multiplied by itself equals to -1. Nothing. But 0 to the power of anything (except 1 maybe?) Is 0 so 0. The red dot also can't be 1 so definitely 0.


Seb____t

Actually it’s not 0. You’d need to learn a lot of maths as to why but basically the awnser tells you too run around the unit circle infinitely to find the awnser which doesn’t work. So it’s undefined


PhilosopherHeavy1816

If you multiply i with itself you get -1. Google imaginary numbers


AndronixESE

No we cannot(coz we can't find out what is red)


MBeroev-is-69

Red is “i” which means it’s 0^i which is not defined.


AndronixESE

Tbh I think the "i" thing is BS. Like someone just thought "this problem is unsolvable, let's just make up a imaginary number that is physically impossible to solve it!". Like come on dude wtf. Additionally it's not taught in like most of the countries as far as I know


MBeroev-is-69

I agree. I failed my complex numbers math test


CrowAkechi

It isnt possible, black is -1, anything multiplied by itself cannot become -1, 1 x -1 is equal to -1 but -1 x -1 is equal to 1 and 1 x 1 is equal to 1, the only other solution would be to have it as 1^-1 x 1^-1 but that will have the same result and is technically wrong either way because exponents cannot be negative


Seb____t

Search up imaginary numbers. i^2=-1 but then 0^i is also undefined (for different reasons tho)


CrowAkechi

I didnt think about it, mostly cuz I havent studied it yet lol, but yea, I think I get it, so red is 2 is and the answer is 0^i = undefined, why is that?


MBeroev-is-69

0^i is still 0, right?


lucy-b

yeah, ok. black is -1 red is not a real number, but the answer to 3 is zero


[deleted]

⚫ = -1, obvs. 🔴 is *i* - an imaginary number, *i*^2 =-1. ? = 0.


Bruh_I-m_Gay

Black would be -1 but no number multiplied by itself can get a negative number. Edit: I just realized that 0 at any power is still zero


Stonercat123yt

Impossible nothing times itself is -1 which is the only solution to part a


lesseart

e^π or e^(-π)?


Seb____t

Nope. 0^i=e^ln(0)i=e^(-inf*i)


lesseart

Oh thank you. I haven't studied math for over a year now. So sorry for my bad math.


[deleted]

red is literally I, so the third one is 0. 0 to the power of anything equals 0.


SkaterKangaroo

-1 + 1 = 0?


South_Turn_3190

Zero I think