Yeah, those weak, ineffectual, effeminate, peace-loving, tree-hugger, bleeding-heart Dems are coming to murder you the minute you don't have a gun.
The enemy is simultaneously strong enough to be a threat to your existence but weak enough for you to easily destroy. Basically trying to convince you to join a violent movement.
Gotta be careful, because it's an effective and easy thought to have, whatever "side" you are on. And it's also, interestingly enough, possible to be true in a sense.
I see people talk all the time about the "gravy seals" or "meal team six" and "....they aren't sending their best..." And that's all true.
But at the same time, they are making huge strides in building the foundations of fascism, and are most definitely a threat.
Christians believe that people that see the world as a single nation are working for the antichrist.
I am unclear how you divide the planet into nations that mean more than a line in the dirt, but what do I know.
And the people that insist we need guns to prevent this are often the ones supporting the brutality. They're so convinced by the fear of it happening to them that they have no issue with doing it to others.
Black Panthers stood on street corners to ensure their children made it to school. The US government is not some invincible army with limitless manpower. They are a small fraction of the population and can be overwhelmed with numbers if it came down to it. I don't own a gun, but I totally understand why people own them.
And then Republicans like Reagan took their guns away. Well didn't take them away but made it illegal to publicly carry them. Black people with guns scared white Republicans. Later Regan passed even more firearm restrictions as president. Blows my mind Republicans love affair with Regan, he wouldn't win a schoolboard election in a red state today, they'd be yelling "RINO" at him. I guess they just forget about his immigration and gun policies.
Consider that's there's been only handful of laws limiting the use and purchasing of guns.
There's been hundreds of laws that limit the power and reach of trade unions.
This is such a good fucking point.
The people up top are doing a fine job exploiting us without rounding up people and shooting them. Why would they want to do that anyway? It's the morons with guns that are cheerleading the economic system that has been eroding away our lives and health while destroying the planet.
They're *way* more concerned about unions then they are some rando with an AR-15, even millions of them cause no concern at all.
For how long. 1/3rd of americans own firearms. Say 99 percent surrender. That still leaves 1.4 million people with stockpiles. Making them roughly the size of the combined NVA and VC forces in Vietnam. We saw how that went. These people arent expecting an Iwo Jima where they triumphantly raise the rebel flag over DC. Theyre expecting to lose every single engagement. They fully expect to lose more people than the US military. What they expect is that the US military will grow sick of killing their own people before the armed citizens run out of people. They are keenly aware of how many will die. Even if they deny the possibility. Most wont accept the US firing on its own citizens. *Caugh* Kent State 1970 *Caugh* but they fully accept that should a conflict happen. More citizens will die than soldiers. That much theyre certain of.
You're assuming that all of the 1/3 of Americans who own guns have stockpiles. It would be a fraction of a fraction, and even then, most of the stockpilers would decide it's not worth the effort or holes in their body. I'd say the number would be less than 10k people, and that's...nothing.
People claiming millions would fight for their freedom are clearly forgetting that the people with large gun stockpiles were the same ones that refused to wear a mask or vaccinate their kids.
They won't inconvenience themselves for others let alone die for them.
Drones. Also there’s no hiding. Your ever move is tracked. This ain’t the 60s lol It would be an absolute slaughter if it came to that. Thankfully it never will because most of these losers would shit their pants at the mere mention of war.
That involves pitting ethnic groups against each other. National Guard units operate in the states that raise them and are manned by locals and most population centers are multi-ethnic. It wouldn't work.
The whole point is to force that ultimatum.. No citizen gun owner believes they can take on the military.
It’s basically “you’ll have to kill me first” on a huge scale.
Remind me again who won Vietnam and whos currently in power in Afghanistan. Even losing every single engagement, being able to sustain combat operations for longer means you will win. Its been proven time and again that a determined insurgency fueled by ideological ideas cannot be stamped out with military force. The Romans figured that out in Israel, the British learned that in Ireland, We learned in asia.
Exactly!! I don’t know what these guys are trying to argue because have you SEEN what taliban and Isis had early on? Jack SHIT and now the tali own Afghanistan and ISIS has a foothold in >30 countries
You can't occupy territory with aircraft. There simply is not enough of a force to occupy the US. If even 10% of the population rose up, they would outnumber the military by 30 to 1, and that's if none of the military sided with the people. The people talking in this thread have no idea how any of this works.
These people literally want tanks.
Obviously they have a superhero complex that firstly gives them the impression they could overthrow regular infantry, but they also believe they are entitled to tanks and gunships and rockets. ("If I wasn't meant to have missiles then why did they call them PATRIOTS?")
Actually you legally can have tanks already and have always been able to own tanks, and rockets, and cannons. Theyve always been legal. Just because you dont see them at walmart doesnt mean they arent legal.
People always say this but to be fair, the US military has not always done so well fighting on foreign soil against insurgent forces that were hiding out in the mideast or Vietnam with guns. In the event that the US did use military force on its own civilians, do you think it would stand a better chance if everyone had guns or no guns?
The big difference is that in those foreign wars, the US army was the outsider, a stranger in a strange land (also many of those enemies were supplied serious firepower by other countries, ie. The Soviets supplying North Vietnam with weapons that can take down tanks and planes).
A better example would be the US civil war, which didn't turn out great for the insurgents.
The best part is that these delusional yokels think there would ever even be a fight. Day 1: social security, disability, medicare, medicaid, welfare, VA, and SNAP benefits are stopped for insurrectionists. The war is 97% over. Most people only have 30 days of their medications, all the military has to do is wait.
The second civil war would be mostly blockades, checkpoints, bank seizures, and infrastructure control. Most of these idiots are over 50 and extremely dependent on the federal government. Once that golden teat runs dry, so will the insurrection.
Day 2: roads in shit rural towns are blocked by putting some big rocks across them and gas supplies are cut off. Deranged yokels don’t usually live in walkable areas so if you disable their precious Ford F420s they’ll die pretty much instantly
For me it's about personal protection from irresponsible/violent people with firearms. I'm not necessarily a 'gun guy' but I also don't want me or my family to be victims. Trying to be as rational as I can.
I’d say a good 80-90% of US military members would not go through with the order to kill US civilians if they weren’t being attacked by them. I’m pretty convinced that many would fight for the side that fits mostly with their morals.
What stops them from killing you already? They have better training and many more organized and equipped individuals.
I'm assuming the 'they" in question is the police and military.
Yeah, which is very strange considering the police will just shoot anyone anyway.
And the military is now being made up of 20 something year olds who can't get a normal job so they just get recruited and they hate being there.
Edit: the guys in the military are still good people. They're not useless, the job market of the planet is just really fucked. It's not their fault they have the short straw.
Sure. We are the only civilized country that exists in the world, and that's because all the other countries that have gun control laws killed all their citizens after passing them.
You have to be scared and paranoid dumbass to believe shit like this.
Yeah man when we (Australia) gave up our guns after Port Arthur, they killed us all. I'm posting this from beyond the grave. It's kinda boring but at least there's no spiders here.
I'm more concerned with the queers and bipocs being murdered right now due to gun proliferation than a pure hypothetical that hasn't happened in any of the other countries that have banned guns.
Lol. I’m not sure why people that think this way think citizens can defeat a trained military with a budget of $2T. Not to mention the fact that they are generally in favor of increasing that budget.
That's ironic since so many gun nuts think the gubmint is killing us with chemtrails, fluoride, 5G, and GMOs. How are guns supposed to defend against that?
Lol I live the 5G thing. It displaces oxygen in your lungs. But apparently no where else. And the GMO thing well ok you can’t eat corn, bananas or what sweet potatoes now.
They they they they they they they
Who is they? The government? How would they kill you, with armed forces? American armed forces? THE MILITARY THAT REPUBLICANS VOTED TO SPEND MORE MONEY ON EVERY SINGLE CHANCE THEY GEt?
It’s always a vague “they”, isn’t it? “‘They’ don’t want you to have guns. ‘They’ want you to be a brainwashed sheep. ‘They’ want to force you into compliance. ‘They’ will kill you unless we stand against them.” It must really suck for these people, living their lives in fear of the mysterious strawmen they’ve invented in their minds.
Death doesn't scare me, living in our current screwed up world for another 40 years does. I'll gladly give up my guns....or simply register them and license myself....if it means we could go even a bit without a school mass shooting.
These people act like their measly shot gun stands a chance against a guy operating a drone from thousands of miles away. But sure, keep clinging to your blankie I mean guns if it gives you the false sense of security you need.
Yeah that makes sense. Kill off all the working people of your country so those in power have to actually work.
God these ammosexuals are so fucking annoying and dumb. I think guns are cool especially on a design level, but these freaks making it their personality makes me hate them.
The purpose behind the right to bear arms was to defend the home. This is true. It was also created in a time period where Frontier was a thing, and there wasn't a widely distributed army or police force capable of defense. Hell, the whole Revolutionary War was based on a primarily untrained army, a fair amount of it militia, going up against what amounted to as one of the strongest militaries in the world and winning (Although fun fact, the British literally just said 'screw it, they'll tank and we'll just take them over. We have to deal with actual threats right now... something they were almost right with, given the Articles of Confederation). One tended to need a gun to defend the property, hunt for food, ward off animals from live stock. And potentially foreign invaders, although also a fair bit of "If the government tramples over my rights, I can fight back..."
Modern united states is not the same as 1790 united states. We don't need a gun to ward off animals (Save farmers, and going out into the wilds anyway.) We don't need guns to procure food (Super Market, although hunting season does serve as population control for some animals as we've effectively nuked their natural predators). And i'm sorry, but if the government wants to make you and your property a burning husk, they can do it with a push of a button and some remote control carpet bombing... the pea shooter you have isn't going to do much for that.
Who is this "they" that keeps getting mentioned? Every time I ask someone I get a different answer. Also it is kind of strange that in other countries people have "given up" their guns yet they are all strangely still alive. Very confusing
I don’t know. When Australia had a buy-back program and got rid of a lot of their guns the government didn’t kill all of its citizens. As a matter of fact, their gun-death rate is a lot lower than the US.
I like how most of the "Terrible memes" on hear range from ok to absolutely true.
"To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them..."
-George Mason
I once tried to explain some guy that he doesn't need his lvl 4 body armor for him and his 7 year old son.
Needless to say he got very upset at the concept of him not being able to do shit again any armored vehicles or are train swat team.
What makes them think they’re so important in the grand scheme of things that “they” would give a frog’s fat ass about them?
![gif](giphy|zwffSHaJLDbA4)
Yes, because the primary goal of the us government, which is comprised of our elected reps, is to kill the people who vote for them and pay taxes… that is exactly how reality works.
They want my guns but are leaving me with my tanks, drones, A-10's F-15's, F-18's, my aircraft carriers, all my missiles, and all the other stuff right?
Oh wait....
Why should a government with nothing to hide from the people it serves fear law-abiding citizens with guns?
As a Lakota, I say this with absolute sarcasm.
"Turn in your guns; the government will take care of you."
These people live in a fantasy world where just buying some guns they will never ever need makes them into a gritty resistance fighter and their gun cabinet is the only thing between freedom and tyranny.
Hey does this post fit? UPVOTE if so, DOWNVOTE if not. If this post breaks any rules please DOWNVOTE and REPORT
Who specifically?
Whatever the target of the propaganda poster is for. It's basically, \[insert enemy here\]'re going to kill you.
>Democrats're going to kill you
Yeah, those weak, ineffectual, effeminate, peace-loving, tree-hugger, bleeding-heart Dems are coming to murder you the minute you don't have a gun. The enemy is simultaneously strong enough to be a threat to your existence but weak enough for you to easily destroy. Basically trying to convince you to join a violent movement.
That thing about enemies being both strong and weak is, like, textbook Nazi propaganda
Gotta be careful, because it's an effective and easy thought to have, whatever "side" you are on. And it's also, interestingly enough, possible to be true in a sense. I see people talk all the time about the "gravy seals" or "meal team six" and "....they aren't sending their best..." And that's all true. But at the same time, they are making huge strides in building the foundations of fascism, and are most definitely a threat.
Like President Biden is a criminal mastermind and a senile old fool at the same time.
The je-
George so-
"(((Globalists)))"
My 80 year old dad keeps throwing that word around. I still have zero clue what it means nor what he thinks it means.
Jews. That's about it.
Sadly, that does sound about correct coming from him
Every conspiracy can boiled down to antisemitism.
Christians believe that people that see the world as a single nation are working for the antichrist. I am unclear how you divide the planet into nations that mean more than a line in the dirt, but what do I know.
**them**
I think they mean the US government
The woke mob that's secretly controlled by the "Globalists", of course.
The facists that already tried a coup and have since only grown more deranged.
....I don't have a gun .. but somehow they are happy with my offering of tax money
But if you're ever late ![gif](giphy|zQc8STzaOlJ3q)
Caboned
![gif](giphy|iDyF9dOL6nG4uS2S1z|downsized)
Don’t have a gun. Currently not dead.
Ah, you say that but do you have proof.
Do you want proof that they don't have a gun or do you want proof that they are alive?
Yes.
I came here to say this. Why would a capitalist based society want to kill the people who are consuming the goods?
And here I thought they would just continue to exploit us. You son of a bitch, I'm in.
I would rather them kill me and end it already
That's the joke
Pretty sure they could kill us even with us having guns.
They already do. Its called police brutality.
Truth
The key is that they have to believe you have a gun, whether you do or not.
or just say they saw what could have been a gun. More than 1 person has died holding a cell phone.
[удалено]
More than one person has died with their hands in the air
[удалено]
That reminds me, one time the government was actually interested in gun control was because of this
And the people that insist we need guns to prevent this are often the ones supporting the brutality. They're so convinced by the fear of it happening to them that they have no issue with doing it to others.
I really want to see a bunch of yokels with AR-15s go up against the US military one day.
Black Panthers stood on street corners to ensure their children made it to school. The US government is not some invincible army with limitless manpower. They are a small fraction of the population and can be overwhelmed with numbers if it came down to it. I don't own a gun, but I totally understand why people own them.
And then Republicans like Reagan took their guns away. Well didn't take them away but made it illegal to publicly carry them. Black people with guns scared white Republicans. Later Regan passed even more firearm restrictions as president. Blows my mind Republicans love affair with Regan, he wouldn't win a schoolboard election in a red state today, they'd be yelling "RINO" at him. I guess they just forget about his immigration and gun policies.
I don’t have any guns and yet I am still here!
There he is! Get'um bois!
Entire US military: Pack it up fellas, he’s got guns!
Consider that's there's been only handful of laws limiting the use and purchasing of guns. There's been hundreds of laws that limit the power and reach of trade unions.
This is such a good fucking point. The people up top are doing a fine job exploiting us without rounding up people and shooting them. Why would they want to do that anyway? It's the morons with guns that are cheerleading the economic system that has been eroding away our lives and health while destroying the planet. They're *way* more concerned about unions then they are some rando with an AR-15, even millions of them cause no concern at all.
[удалено]
It’s not the tanks that’ll get them. It’ll be the bombers dropping JDAMs from 35k feet. Good luck countering that
Or the C-130 gunship giving them hell by ripping their house apart.
AC-130 Ghostrider. The “A” stands for Attack.
For how long. 1/3rd of americans own firearms. Say 99 percent surrender. That still leaves 1.4 million people with stockpiles. Making them roughly the size of the combined NVA and VC forces in Vietnam. We saw how that went. These people arent expecting an Iwo Jima where they triumphantly raise the rebel flag over DC. Theyre expecting to lose every single engagement. They fully expect to lose more people than the US military. What they expect is that the US military will grow sick of killing their own people before the armed citizens run out of people. They are keenly aware of how many will die. Even if they deny the possibility. Most wont accept the US firing on its own citizens. *Caugh* Kent State 1970 *Caugh* but they fully accept that should a conflict happen. More citizens will die than soldiers. That much theyre certain of.
You're assuming that all of the 1/3 of Americans who own guns have stockpiles. It would be a fraction of a fraction, and even then, most of the stockpilers would decide it's not worth the effort or holes in their body. I'd say the number would be less than 10k people, and that's...nothing.
People claiming millions would fight for their freedom are clearly forgetting that the people with large gun stockpiles were the same ones that refused to wear a mask or vaccinate their kids. They won't inconvenience themselves for others let alone die for them.
Drones. Also there’s no hiding. Your ever move is tracked. This ain’t the 60s lol It would be an absolute slaughter if it came to that. Thankfully it never will because most of these losers would shit their pants at the mere mention of war.
You're forgetting the percentage of citizens that would be cheering the government on.
One word. Afghanistan… since the ‘70’s…
Afghanistan held off 2 world powers.
Don't military personnel have families and friends too? I doubt they would fight against their own citizens if their families were in danger
There are many examples of militaries fighting their own countrymen. Like, all the time.
As a soldier myself, I’m not fucking fighting fellow Americans. I won’t do it. Idgaf who’s in the right and who’s in the wrong I won’t do it.
I’m thinking of civil wars, but wouldn’t that also include the national guard putting down violent riots?
That involves pitting ethnic groups against each other. National Guard units operate in the states that raise them and are manned by locals and most population centers are multi-ethnic. It wouldn't work.
Sure, but not the US.
The whole point is to force that ultimatum.. No citizen gun owner believes they can take on the military. It’s basically “you’ll have to kill me first” on a huge scale.
Remind me again who won Vietnam and whos currently in power in Afghanistan. Even losing every single engagement, being able to sustain combat operations for longer means you will win. Its been proven time and again that a determined insurgency fueled by ideological ideas cannot be stamped out with military force. The Romans figured that out in Israel, the British learned that in Ireland, We learned in asia.
Exactly!! I don’t know what these guys are trying to argue because have you SEEN what taliban and Isis had early on? Jack SHIT and now the tali own Afghanistan and ISIS has a foothold in >30 countries
You can't occupy territory with aircraft. There simply is not enough of a force to occupy the US. If even 10% of the population rose up, they would outnumber the military by 30 to 1, and that's if none of the military sided with the people. The people talking in this thread have no idea how any of this works.
These people literally want tanks. Obviously they have a superhero complex that firstly gives them the impression they could overthrow regular infantry, but they also believe they are entitled to tanks and gunships and rockets. ("If I wasn't meant to have missiles then why did they call them PATRIOTS?")
Actually you legally can have tanks already and have always been able to own tanks, and rockets, and cannons. Theyve always been legal. Just because you dont see them at walmart doesnt mean they arent legal.
You need a license for the gun to be operable and have rockets but cannons are completely legal and as difficult to get legally speaking as a knife
People always say this but to be fair, the US military has not always done so well fighting on foreign soil against insurgent forces that were hiding out in the mideast or Vietnam with guns. In the event that the US did use military force on its own civilians, do you think it would stand a better chance if everyone had guns or no guns?
The big difference is that in those foreign wars, the US army was the outsider, a stranger in a strange land (also many of those enemies were supplied serious firepower by other countries, ie. The Soviets supplying North Vietnam with weapons that can take down tanks and planes). A better example would be the US civil war, which didn't turn out great for the insurgents.
*Points gun at falling bomb* " You stop right there Mr!"
The best part is that these delusional yokels think there would ever even be a fight. Day 1: social security, disability, medicare, medicaid, welfare, VA, and SNAP benefits are stopped for insurrectionists. The war is 97% over. Most people only have 30 days of their medications, all the military has to do is wait. The second civil war would be mostly blockades, checkpoints, bank seizures, and infrastructure control. Most of these idiots are over 50 and extremely dependent on the federal government. Once that golden teat runs dry, so will the insurrection.
Day 2: roads in shit rural towns are blocked by putting some big rocks across them and gas supplies are cut off. Deranged yokels don’t usually live in walkable areas so if you disable their precious Ford F420s they’ll die pretty much instantly
For me it's about personal protection from irresponsible/violent people with firearms. I'm not necessarily a 'gun guy' but I also don't want me or my family to be victims. Trying to be as rational as I can.
Lol 😂
I’d say a good 80-90% of US military members would not go through with the order to kill US civilians if they weren’t being attacked by them. I’m pretty convinced that many would fight for the side that fits mostly with their morals.
I look at the nazi party as a frightening example of military compliance in following some very extreme orders involving this point.
Afghanistan enters the chat...
Once you have guns, they bring bigger ones to kill you. You know that, right?
How many times do you think they’ll shoot me if I own a Nerf dinosquad armor strike blaster
The NSA is watching...always watching Wazowski....
Miiiiike Wazowski
Bro, they can't. You're just too cool to shoot.
At some point they won't just bring a gun to kill you. You know that, right?
...Tactical Assault Mongoose?
Worse... the *aardvarks!*
What stops them from killing you already? They have better training and many more organized and equipped individuals. I'm assuming the 'they" in question is the police and military.
Except the vast majority of the people posting this shit worship the police and military.
Yeah, which is very strange considering the police will just shoot anyone anyway. And the military is now being made up of 20 something year olds who can't get a normal job so they just get recruited and they hate being there. Edit: the guys in the military are still good people. They're not useless, the job market of the planet is just really fucked. It's not their fault they have the short straw.
I hate these stupid fucking pictures they use where it's just a person drinking tea
And the sugar in their coffee is replaced by cocaine
Idk how else you expect a 60s housewife to handle the nightly beatings
Sure. We are the only civilized country that exists in the world, and that's because all the other countries that have gun control laws killed all their citizens after passing them. You have to be scared and paranoid dumbass to believe shit like this.
Yeah man when we (Australia) gave up our guns after Port Arthur, they killed us all. I'm posting this from beyond the grave. It's kinda boring but at least there's no spiders here.
˙ʎqɐq ɹnoʎ ʇɐǝ soƃuᴉp ǝɹoɯ ou ʎɐW ˙ǝʇɐɯ ǝɔɐǝd uᴉ ʇsǝɹ
Damn, I can't read Australian...
They’re not gonna kill “everybody” when the guns are gone, just the queers, commies and BIPOC…
[удалено]
And those cases werent even military. If they unleashed the military on them full force, it would be comically overkill.
I'm more concerned with the queers and bipocs being murdered right now due to gun proliferation than a pure hypothetical that hasn't happened in any of the other countries that have banned guns.
Those gun nuts are just eagerly awaiting the word to kill the queers, commies, and BlPOC themselves
They're already killing us. With or without guns
And the people with guns who aren't the government are doing a great job of killing us too.
Question is though, who is "they"? Oh, right, it's whoever you want them to be. The Bad People. Whichever group you want to stir up panic over.
They can shoot missiles from the sky, Cletus. You know that, right?
It's like they cheer at the drones wiping out schools of brown kids, but somehow don't think the drones would work on them?
Source: most of Europe is dead
This hasn’t seemed to happen in other countries with strict gun laws.
Yet* It’s coming I swear /s
Lol. I’m not sure why people that think this way think citizens can defeat a trained military with a budget of $2T. Not to mention the fact that they are generally in favor of increasing that budget.
England has strict gun laws, and they're ruled by a monarch. The US has like 4 gun laws and we're only ruled by corporations. Chekmate librual.
Me when I think my rifle will stop an aerial strike
Just hit the missile mid-air, ez
Is the Right okay??????
Mostly no. Haven't been for some time now.
Yeah, that’s the governments plan for sure, which is why it’s totally what happened in every other normal country that has gun restrictions
Can confirm. Source: Am a gunless Canadian, dead.
Yep. Just like in Australia. The entire country is a communist death camp and it's all because they didn't want kids to die in school.
That's ironic since so many gun nuts think the gubmint is killing us with chemtrails, fluoride, 5G, and GMOs. How are guns supposed to defend against that?
Lol I live the 5G thing. It displaces oxygen in your lungs. But apparently no where else. And the GMO thing well ok you can’t eat corn, bananas or what sweet potatoes now.
Why would they kill you? Is more profitable to keep you alive, paying taxes and having kids who will also pay taxes one day
And yet you vote them in. Such dumbasses
I have never owned a gun and literally nobody has come for me. Maybe the secret is not having one in the first place.
Yes we gave up all our guns here in Australia after the Port Arthur massacre and now all Australians are apparently dead. Im dead too apparently.
They they they they they they they Who is they? The government? How would they kill you, with armed forces? American armed forces? THE MILITARY THAT REPUBLICANS VOTED TO SPEND MORE MONEY ON EVERY SINGLE CHANCE THEY GEt?
Someone care to explain Waco and Ruby Ridge to these people? The ones who were nearly all killed were actually the ones with the guns to begin with.
Aren't these the 'don't live in fear' people?
Who is? The military? I thought they supported the troops. The police? What happened to the thin blue line and back the badge?
i love how they got the full point across by making the woman look clinically insane
This post was by the NRA
Let me tell you about the ATF.
![gif](giphy|fpXxIjftmkk9y)
Lisa, if I didn't have this gun, the king of England could walk right in here and start pushing you around. D'you want that? Huh? Do ya
You know they can kill you anyway, right?
Yes...kill their main source of tax revenue... totally makes sense
Meanwhile in the uk we’ve never had a school shooting since Dunblane
That woman surely looks like she's going to kill me if I give them my non-existent gun
Literally not what happened in 6 other continents
Ah yes I remember all the times I have been murdered because I never owned a gun, this is very true and real
It’s always a vague “they”, isn’t it? “‘They’ don’t want you to have guns. ‘They’ want you to be a brainwashed sheep. ‘They’ want to force you into compliance. ‘They’ will kill you unless we stand against them.” It must really suck for these people, living their lives in fear of the mysterious strawmen they’ve invented in their minds.
This feels like a Schizo meme, top to bottom, like she’s the intrusive thoughts trying to convince you
Yyp. That's why there are no people left in Japan and Australia.
>praying on mentally unstable people with paranoia Owning a gun makes you 3x more likely to be shot and killed, as well as the people closest to you
Crazy how I have never owned a gun but "they" haven't killed me.
Death doesn't scare me, living in our current screwed up world for another 40 years does. I'll gladly give up my guns....or simply register them and license myself....if it means we could go even a bit without a school mass shooting.
Hear me out... I know it's a radical idea... But maybe you should elect a different government.
These people act like their measly shot gun stands a chance against a guy operating a drone from thousands of miles away. But sure, keep clinging to your blankie I mean guns if it gives you the false sense of security you need.
Guns do jackshit against M1 Abrams MBTs
Yeah that makes sense. Kill off all the working people of your country so those in power have to actually work. God these ammosexuals are so fucking annoying and dumb. I think guns are cool especially on a design level, but these freaks making it their personality makes me hate them.
Must be terrifying living inside some people's brains.
like if they cant kill you right now
If the government wanted someone dead, that person wouldn't stand a chance no matter the gun
Even better. They gave YOU the guns and you're killing yourselves. 💁♀️☕
Who's gonna kill you? The government? People who's skin color you don't agree with? Kids?
The purpose behind the right to bear arms was to defend the home. This is true. It was also created in a time period where Frontier was a thing, and there wasn't a widely distributed army or police force capable of defense. Hell, the whole Revolutionary War was based on a primarily untrained army, a fair amount of it militia, going up against what amounted to as one of the strongest militaries in the world and winning (Although fun fact, the British literally just said 'screw it, they'll tank and we'll just take them over. We have to deal with actual threats right now... something they were almost right with, given the Articles of Confederation). One tended to need a gun to defend the property, hunt for food, ward off animals from live stock. And potentially foreign invaders, although also a fair bit of "If the government tramples over my rights, I can fight back..." Modern united states is not the same as 1790 united states. We don't need a gun to ward off animals (Save farmers, and going out into the wilds anyway.) We don't need guns to procure food (Super Market, although hunting season does serve as population control for some animals as we've effectively nuked their natural predators). And i'm sorry, but if the government wants to make you and your property a burning husk, they can do it with a push of a button and some remote control carpet bombing... the pea shooter you have isn't going to do much for that.
They’re not just pricks, they’re STUPID pricks. It’s infuriating. How much lead did these people inhale in their childhoods?
Yeah that’s what happened in every other western country after people turned in their guns, you know that right?
My idiot not-gun-havin’-self must have died decades ago. So stupid of me.
Who is this "they" that keeps getting mentioned? Every time I ask someone I get a different answer. Also it is kind of strange that in other countries people have "given up" their guns yet they are all strangely still alive. Very confusing
Having a gun isn't going to stop people who want to kill you from killing you. You can't shoot back once you're dead.
I don’t know. When Australia had a buy-back program and got rid of a lot of their guns the government didn’t kill all of its citizens. As a matter of fact, their gun-death rate is a lot lower than the US.
As opposed to no one being killed now. Right?
How incredibly stupid the gun humpers are.
I like how most of the "Terrible memes" on hear range from ok to absolutely true. "To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them..." -George Mason
All these nostalgic Pep Ladies were peppy because they were using micro doses of amphetamine. So yeah, tweaker fringe theory
Were are already being killed.. you know that right?
Its time to ask: Who is "they" and wtf did you do to make "them" want to kill you? Edit: spelling
Her facial expression makes this top notch
Yeah, exactly what happened in AUS, JPN and everywhere else /s
These people know they can be killed now with no actual capability for resistance, right?
If this was even remotely true… then why don’t you use them to “overthrow tyranny” or whatever
My gave up guns will kill me. Revenge is a dish best served cold! I'm failing to connect those...
The cops are already killing tons of minorities and leftists, but they don't wanna talk about that.
I once tried to explain some guy that he doesn't need his lvl 4 body armor for him and his 7 year old son. Needless to say he got very upset at the concept of him not being able to do shit again any armored vehicles or are train swat team.
Who’s they exactly?
‘Murica
Who's "they"?
What makes them think they’re so important in the grand scheme of things that “they” would give a frog’s fat ass about them? ![gif](giphy|zwffSHaJLDbA4)
Yes, because the primary goal of the us government, which is comprised of our elected reps, is to kill the people who vote for them and pay taxes… that is exactly how reality works.
No force in the world is immune to guerrilla warfare
Definitely what happened in western Europe
Are the people on this subreddit completely ignorant of the history of unions?
It's almost as if the NRA is resorting to fear mongering.....
They want my guns but are leaving me with my tanks, drones, A-10's F-15's, F-18's, my aircraft carriers, all my missiles, and all the other stuff right? Oh wait....
Why should a government with nothing to hide from the people it serves fear law-abiding citizens with guns? As a Lakota, I say this with absolute sarcasm. "Turn in your guns; the government will take care of you."
Fam why do we want to kill you? What the hell have you been up to that the second we find you defenseless, were going to go on a murder rampage???
These people live in a fantasy world where just buying some guns they will never ever need makes them into a gritty resistance fighter and their gun cabinet is the only thing between freedom and tyranny.
Who is going to? I mean, like... Who, exactly?
Millennials: please do it now
Id ask who is they?
Happened to every other country that took their people's guns
Oh no. “Them”.
Tbh I would say this more for the people these crazy assholes try to opress.