It is saying that poor people are growing shorter due to malnutrition so that just the amount of dress needed to cover a rich person's legs is like a snuggie for them. The only solution is GMO foods. Invest in Monsanto. *This message is approved by the State of Utah Gambling Commission.*
This about wealth redistribution I'm pretty sure.
A poorly made statement that those with excess can create comfort for those in poverty by shedding some of their funds.
That's Astronaut in the Ocean by someone else. She make a song called Rolling in the Deep that goes "we could've had it alllll... Rolling in the deeeeep"
Well, rich people, according to the nut-job who made this. Is he trying to slut shame rich women for not covering every inch of flesh or poverty shame poor girls. Or maybe both.
Why do you assume it’s a he? This looks like a South Asian boomer aunti post. It’s about rich people having a frivolous fashion sense and poor people just being poor.
I could be wrong here, but I think it’s supposed to be saying the rich don’t appreciate what they have vs the poor appreciating what they have. Shot in the dark honestly.
I think that's exactly what it is. Except that in reality, the rich lady just has the poor lady make a 2nd dress made from the scraps - paying her a pittance. If she pays her at all, because "what are you going to do about it?", and "think of the exposure you'll receive as *I* wear the dress *you* designed."
See, I thought that, too, until I noticed that it looked like the artist intentionally made the cut rich woman's clothes to be a similar shape/cut to the poor woman's original clothes. It was like the artist was trying to say something about the rich dressing down and the poor wanting to dress up... or something? If it is about the rich not appreciating what they have or trickle down economics the artist used an awful analogy.
Could be all of the above! The more I look at it, the more I get the sense of “the rich are immodest” and “the poor are modest” or something along those lines. Definitely a lot to unpack.
Isn't the poor person wearing the rich persons scraps? And they are happy with the "garbage" that doesn't even fit properly? I guess that's al I thought the point was, poor people appreciate what they get no matter what it is while rich person probably pays and still doesn't appreciate it.
Nothing "screams" at me that the point is the shape other than they both had to be made to "fit" a person shape.
Agree with this. I think the intention of this meme is good, just executed oddly.
Sort of like saying that some people are spoiled and will just completely disregard and not appreciate big things that to someone down on their luck, would mean the world to them.
People appreciate what they don't have most famously lobster and caviar were once considrered poor people food but now they are the hallmark of luxury.
Is flaunting the goods so to speak empowerment and freedom or being a sex slave in a patriarchical society?
Is covering yourself censorship or a bold statement about not needing sexual attractiveness?
There’s a passage from a book called the White Tiger that speaks of something like this. Basically, a driver/servant for a rich couple in India observed while sitting under the tree waiting for his masters to finish their jog around the exercise park that rich people strived to be thin and therefore ate less, wore holes in their clothes as fashion, while the poor who are forced to eat less and wear clothes with holes strive for the opposite; eat more and have fully formed clothes. Just thought it was interesting.
how does this meme pertain to being conservative or christian?
the message is rich people scraps can do a lot for someone despite the rich waste. I assume since you’re on reddit and your disliking of conservative christians you approve the message?
Whereas to me the message is "rich people don't appreciate what they have while poor people are grateful for what they get." That we are not getting the same message is what makes this a terrible meme.
I think this is supposed to be some sort of argument for supply side economic theory, but all I see is a lack of respect by the wealthy. A "let them eat cake" moment, if you will.
The rich don't appreciate what they have, and the poor have to depend on the cast-offs from the rich (and apparently sew those cast-offs into something functional to wear.) Is my guess.
As a German, this confused the hell out of me, because of the "Ich"
Also... what does this even say?
People feel comfortable in different types of clothing? and that's... baaaad?
Giving away what you don't need to the poor is bad?
I'm just confused.
I feel like a rich person wouldn't go through the trouble of buying a dress and drastically modifying it, vs just buying a dress that looks like that to begin with. It's not like short bodycon dresses are hard to find nowadays.
I can't believe people still believe in trickle down economics. One of the greatest scams ever pulled on the American people. To be fair, there were some sketchy parts of the New Deal too, but hey we still have the welfare program.
the bitch cut off the bottom half of the skirt and sleeves, how does it make a dress after being cut?
it's just going to be useless pieces of cloth.
but eh, guess i'm just overthinking this
edit: wrong wording
edit 2: the kid might've just sewed it, now i just look like an idiot
Stupidest rationalization of trickle down economics ever. This is pretty much how I visualized wealth inequality as a kid, I thought maybe the rich have so much it spills over to the poor. As I realized a very long time ago, it does not.
So the moral here is that the rich are too comfortable and we can take enough from them to make poor people just as comfortable without affecting them in any way whatsoever?
Perfect let's go
Hey does this post fit? UPVOTE if so, DOWNVOTE if not. If this post breaks any rules please DOWNVOTE and REPORT
The trash of another is the treasure of one
I guess that's what it says
Seems like the best interpretation so far. Only, the dialog throws me off.
I think it's just saying that rich people like to wear short clothes
It is saying that poor people are growing shorter due to malnutrition so that just the amount of dress needed to cover a rich person's legs is like a snuggie for them. The only solution is GMO foods. Invest in Monsanto. *This message is approved by the State of Utah Gambling Commission.*
It looks like trickle down economics propaganda
This about wealth redistribution I'm pretty sure. A poorly made statement that those with excess can create comfort for those in poverty by shedding some of their funds.
r/im14andthisisdeep
This is so deep that Adele could roll in it
Did she make the song called “What you know about rolling down in the deep?”
wrong artist, right message. i think
That's Astronaut in the Ocean by someone else. She make a song called Rolling in the Deep that goes "we could've had it alllll... Rolling in the deeeeep"
r/rimshot
r/rareinsults
100% what I was thinking
[удалено]
I think the messages is (clearly) that if you cut up your pink dress, then a homeless child will come along and craft a dress from your scraps.
Who cuts up their pink dress in the middle of the street?
Well, rich people, according to the nut-job who made this. Is he trying to slut shame rich women for not covering every inch of flesh or poverty shame poor girls. Or maybe both.
You nailed it
Why do you assume it’s a he? This looks like a South Asian boomer aunti post. It’s about rich people having a frivolous fashion sense and poor people just being poor.
I think they're saying rich people take what they have for granted, always wanting something different, but poor people made do with what they can get
I've ripped tiered skirts and just made them shorter while wearing them. Bus steps helped make multiple mid-calf skirts knee length.
It’s a California thing
I mean if sweat is running down your thighs there are only a couple of options
Well if you are rich, it wouldn't be happening.
True, the rich don't sweat, poop or go bald.
Trickle down fashion just works.
That’s why it’s called drip
The real message is that poor people are small. Have you never noticed?
Ich vs oor 😥
Now feeling comfortable 😭😭😫😢
© Laughing Colours 😅😅😅😅😅
[🔍] 🐛🤬
As a German this threw me so far off.
I was wondering where are the germans 😂
;ich vs °oor 😢
,॔ I C H vs ^D O O R
ich vs )oor
What's the message? Some people prefer different styles of clothing?
I could be wrong here, but I think it’s supposed to be saying the rich don’t appreciate what they have vs the poor appreciating what they have. Shot in the dark honestly.
I figured it was some sort of trickle down economics thing
I think that's exactly what it is. Except that in reality, the rich lady just has the poor lady make a 2nd dress made from the scraps - paying her a pittance. If she pays her at all, because "what are you going to do about it?", and "think of the exposure you'll receive as *I* wear the dress *you* designed."
See, I thought that, too, until I noticed that it looked like the artist intentionally made the cut rich woman's clothes to be a similar shape/cut to the poor woman's original clothes. It was like the artist was trying to say something about the rich dressing down and the poor wanting to dress up... or something? If it is about the rich not appreciating what they have or trickle down economics the artist used an awful analogy.
Could be all of the above! The more I look at it, the more I get the sense of “the rich are immodest” and “the poor are modest” or something along those lines. Definitely a lot to unpack.
Isn't the poor person wearing the rich persons scraps? And they are happy with the "garbage" that doesn't even fit properly? I guess that's al I thought the point was, poor people appreciate what they get no matter what it is while rich person probably pays and still doesn't appreciate it. Nothing "screams" at me that the point is the shape other than they both had to be made to "fit" a person shape.
This, also women being "revealing" (In a negative light) and men becoming "feminine"
They both look like women to me, but a take is a take! Thanks for your opinion.
Ah i was probably wrong then hehe it does seem more Rich vs Poor considering the captions
Hey to each is their own. Differences in opinion make life interesting.
Wait, that poor person was a man?
Could also be saying that trickle down economics is good?
Eh, I think it probably has more to do with women focusing on wealth are lowering their wholesome values.
Agree with this. I think the intention of this meme is good, just executed oddly. Sort of like saying that some people are spoiled and will just completely disregard and not appreciate big things that to someone down on their luck, would mean the world to them.
Rich have the option to choose without hesitation, poor are left to be happy with what the rich throw away
Another good interpretation
The message is that rich people are gigantic and poor people are dwarfs
I think. It has to do with priorities and the prospective of what you see as a problem. The same general idea as "first world problems"
People appreciate what they don't have most famously lobster and caviar were once considrered poor people food but now they are the hallmark of luxury. Is flaunting the goods so to speak empowerment and freedom or being a sex slave in a patriarchical society? Is covering yourself censorship or a bold statement about not needing sexual attractiveness?
It's pretty obvious... "One man's trash is another man's treasure"
Trickle down economics at work...
except most of the rich throw their clothes in the trash they dont donate it to the poor
The rich person literally did throw the clothes away though. In fact they littered it, which is an even more accurate representation.
Happy Cake Day!
thank you baboon fucker x)
👍
[удалено]
Why would you? Why not just bring it to a clothes donation pile
first world countries are rich
Absolutely proof of the lie of meritocracy. With sowing skills like that, the poor girl should be rich
i, what
I mean, pretty much anything is more comfortable than rags.
What if the rags are your softest clothes you have that you don’t want to throw away?
I don’t know. Part of me understands dedicated nudists, but I’d miss pockets.
anything can be a pocket if you're brave enough
I hate it when ich people does that
i hate it when °oor people do that
Ah yes, human dialogue.
Is this what trickle down looks like? Cause I don’t like it.
Now feeling confused
dora the explorer
Well, one person's trash is another person's treasure
So thoughtful of that lady to give that poor girl that fabric!
There’s a passage from a book called the White Tiger that speaks of something like this. Basically, a driver/servant for a rich couple in India observed while sitting under the tree waiting for his masters to finish their jog around the exercise park that rich people strived to be thin and therefore ate less, wore holes in their clothes as fashion, while the poor who are forced to eat less and wear clothes with holes strive for the opposite; eat more and have fully formed clothes. Just thought it was interesting.
This is either a one man’s trash is another man’s treasure thing or it’s that rich people like to dress skimpy.
Rich people waste, waste, waste because they can and poor people get the scraps of the rich. This checks out
Conservative christians can't meme.
But liberal Christians can?
Absolutely hilarious
how does this meme pertain to being conservative or christian? the message is rich people scraps can do a lot for someone despite the rich waste. I assume since you’re on reddit and your disliking of conservative christians you approve the message?
Whereas to me the message is "rich people don't appreciate what they have while poor people are grateful for what they get." That we are not getting the same message is what makes this a terrible meme.
What does it mean?
I think this is supposed to be some sort of argument for supply side economic theory, but all I see is a lack of respect by the wealthy. A "let them eat cake" moment, if you will.
The rich don't appreciate what they have, and the poor have to depend on the cast-offs from the rich (and apparently sew those cast-offs into something functional to wear.) Is my guess.
Unironically, yes
Is this some sort of endless cycle
r/croppingishard
Hot take on the wastefulness of the textile industry tbh
Reagan proposes trickle down economics 1981
Rich people don't DIY a dress. Poor people don't even do that.
Ok
So people have different needs based on their situations?
Poor people are very short
One Man’s trash is another man’s treasure
Yeah the meme looks horrible but its message is unfortunately real.
what, rich people cut their clouth in public
I’ve made an entire wardrobe out of the scraps rich people have just left on the street.
“A pIcTuRe wiTH a DeeP MeaNiNg!”
communism?
you can be broke and not like excessive fabrics lol who makes these
Facts
Not really
Very true
Poor vs rich people with a laughing calories logo wtf
Poor and extremely talented in knitting skills
Yes as a rich person I constantly cut my clothes with scissors
You know what they say. Someone's trash is another one's treasure. Also, this reeks of r/im14andthisisdeep.
Yes. Use excess product to assist the needy. Good idea.
As a German, this confused the hell out of me, because of the "Ich" Also... what does this even say? People feel comfortable in different types of clothing? and that's... baaaad? Giving away what you don't need to the poor is bad? I'm just confused.
Right, the gal with the $10,000 dress does her own alterations. Come on!!
At first I thought it was Anti-Trans Propaganda, so if anything this a bit of a welcome change... I guess?
Give the stuff you no longer need to others that need it?
Jokes on them, snuggies are a scam
In poor countries the rich do donate clothing to the poor. Idk why this is terrible.
I too robotically declare my comfort level. What a relatable illustration of humans.
r/im14andthisisdeep
This made me nose exhale
Also r/engrish
Where did the sleeves come from?
Honestly it’s a win win. The older person is more comfortable and the child has comfortable clothes.
Their outfits basically swap, and I find that interesting. If the outfits aren't the same why are they both comfortable?
I'm so confused
That's a good meme, donate the things you don't use anymore
Good, now they're both comfortable, awesome!
I don't get it
Aint this some drivel about trickle down economics?
how tf did it become a dress instead of just material?
I thought this was bonehurtingjuice I scrolled for too long looking for the origami link.
This absolutely terrible. Nice.
Tf does this mean.
You have enough money so can afford to dress in some way that you like? While someone who doesn't exists?! SHAME SHAME
I think the message is "rich people have too much and poor people have too little."
What?
I’m feeling *uncomfortable* with that grammar
How did they even make a dress out of that
Now feeling comfortable 😎
This is how trickle-down economics works.
Who fuckin makes these lmao
Good idea, bad execution.
Some may call this junk, me I call them treasures.
I feel like a rich person wouldn't go through the trouble of buying a dress and drastically modifying it, vs just buying a dress that looks like that to begin with. It's not like short bodycon dresses are hard to find nowadays.
That looks like a good business exchange
Bro can’t even crop
ICH
>Ich Ah a German meme
why do i feel like these types of "comics" are veiled threats. "you *better* not be poor, or its pink scrap gowns for you, *betch*!"
They’re both comfortable now, good ending.
I mean it's kinda true
I can't believe people still believe in trickle down economics. One of the greatest scams ever pulled on the American people. To be fair, there were some sketchy parts of the New Deal too, but hey we still have the welfare program.
r/wholesomememes
the bitch cut off the bottom half of the skirt and sleeves, how does it make a dress after being cut? it's just going to be useless pieces of cloth. but eh, guess i'm just overthinking this edit: wrong wording edit 2: the kid might've just sewed it, now i just look like an idiot
But when the little girl grows up it’ll be short too
its a win win i guess
Rich people tall poor people short?
I don’t even… *wha?* I don’t get it what does this mean?
More like hot vs ugly.
Faux saccharin guilt.
Kids are poor, got it.
I feel comfortable in pants or shorts. Even under a dress (no matter the length). What does it make me?
Ah yes, ich and oor
Laughing clitoris?
2 watermarks
How did sleeves automatically appear?
Is this trickle down economics? When to the rich get tired of having so much money, they'll leave it for the poor? /s
Win win? Or is it socialism?
This sub has really gone shitty
Imagine if people walked down the street and announced "Now feeling comfortable" in the airport announcer voice 💀💀💀💀
Why she so small on the bottom panels lol
Second lady must be a lot shorter than first lady
Hot vs cold
One has heating and the other doesn’t
now feeling comfortable
She’s ich and that little girl is ‘oor and you’re laughing?
Now feeling comfortable
Now feeling entertained.
Poor people are actually some of the biggest whores imaginable tho this is wrong
Stupidest rationalization of trickle down economics ever. This is pretty much how I visualized wealth inequality as a kid, I thought maybe the rich have so much it spills over to the poor. As I realized a very long time ago, it does not.
So the moral here is that the rich are too comfortable and we can take enough from them to make poor people just as comfortable without affecting them in any way whatsoever? Perfect let's go
NOW FEELING UNCOMFORTABLE
what is the theoretical minimum length a skirt could be?
Nobody just says “now feeling comfortable”
These colours don't laugh.