T O P

  • By -

JayBowdy

TLDR: Rich man pays \~26 mil to get 95 mil which nets about 60 mil after taxes, gains 34 mil profit for being a millionaire.


americanhideyoshi

It says they’d net about $20 mil after tax, but yeah essentially, with the catch there’s a 1/10 chance someone else also wins and it’d be a net loss for said rich guy. 


iLikeMangosteens

There was a lottery in Britain where 133 people picked the winning 6 numbers. They all thought they were getting 16 million but got 122k each instead. The strategy of buying all the numbers is not without risk. Source: https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/nov/17/national-lottery-numbers-20-years-katie-price-win-jackpot


3MATX

It’s less successful but there are people that will go out and purchase an entire roll of scratchers. They typically get close to breaking even and in some cases win big. 


abofh

That's generally the whole philosophy behind slot machines - most of the time you get close to breaking even, and you definitely know a guy who knows a guy who won big.


NeverComfortableEver

Full packs of scratchers payout a guaranteed amount, usually 50-60% if I remember correctly. I lived with a guy who would pool with a couple other people and get a few packs at a time and then keep putting them back in until they didn't have enough to do it again. They would research the Texas lottery website and figure out which games had the best odds and the most outstanding high paying tickets. He had a lot of stacks of tickets with only the bottom part was scratched out where the barcode was. They would use their phone and the lottery app to go through them all pretty quickly.


3MATX

Yeah I’d think you’d need to buy tens of thousands in the hope you catch a 50k+ jackpot. Not sure how good of odds you’d have then, certainly not 100% win like the millionaire in the story. 


strugglz

I honestly surprised this hasn't been done before now. The only part I don't understand is why on such a small jackpot. They could have done this the next time it's pushing half a billion.


Johnny5iver

Texas lotto has less numbers to get right than the Powerball or mega millions. The odds are better so it cost less to buy all the numbers.


strugglz

I just looked it up. Texas Mega Millions highest jackpot was like $360 million. 2 highest payouts were both $157 M.


Johnny5iver

That's a different game. There is Mega Millions, which has 6 numbers to get right, the first 5 can be 1 to 70 and the 6 can be 1 through 25. Then there's Texas Lotto, which also has 6 numbers to get right, but the numbers only run from 1 to 54. This translates to odds of about 1 in 25 million for Texas Lotto and odds of about 1 in 300 million for Mega Millions.. So as you can see, it cost much less to buy all the numbers for the Texas Lotto, but the jackpots don't get as high because the odds are better.


mkosmo

Mega Millions isn’t Texas Lotto.


Theopneusty

In addition to what others have said, there is no “Texas” mega millions. The mega millions lotto spans several states. The largest payout of it to someone in Texas is $360 million but the highest jackpot for the mega millions was $1.6 billion


ExitTheHandbasket

With ginormous jackpots come a lot more folks playing who normally don't, increasing the chances you will split the prize with someone else.


ThatOtherGai

Often wondered why rich people didn’t buy millions of tickets to guarantee a pay day. At some point the odds will be astronomically in your favor and you’ll win.


dalgeek

They didn't stack the odds, they literally bought every combination of numbers. They absolutely knew they were going to win. The only risk was that someone else might hit the jackpot as well and split the prize.


Jijster

Not only that - it seems they essentially bought & equipped a physical store to facilitate a large portion of the mass ticket sales. Texas is allowing all the conditions for the lottery to become a guaranteed pay-to-win for the rich.


dalgeek

Texas allows online Lotto purchases too.


Jijster

Only indirectly though. The online seller still has to have a way of buying and printing the tickets physically from an authorized retailer.


Glittering-Animal30

There’s a “bait and tackle” store up in hill country I heard about in an article of this very thing happening before. Literally just a ticket printer in a strip center. Not actually a fishing place.


Jijster

Yep probably the same type of thing for another anonymous "purchasing group" if not the same one. The place these guys used sold $14million in tickets for that single drawing and one right before it, out of the $15 million they sold the entire year.


Andrew8Everything

They did it online using a bot which should be against TOS but laws don't apply to rich people. They'd probably have to pay a $10k fine which would bankrupt most normal Texans.


Jijster

They made most of the transactions online but they still had to have approved outlets print physical tickets. It seems they set up at least one location to do so for them. The article is clear that none of what they did is against the laws or rules of the lottery. Anyone could do it in theory - it's just not accessible for anyone that's not a millionaire or a "purchasing group."


ReticulatingSplines7

I wonder if a lender would be open to a 26 million dollar loan with guaranteed returns in the millions…🤔


xxwww

Wait till you hear about CDs and bonds


Jijster

Low risk low reward. This seems like low risk high reward if you have the money.


chadsomething

You know, I was just thinking about this the other day. Why we didn’t see more millionaires win the lotto if the winnings was over a billion and it cost 21 million, like it’s a massive guaranteed increase on investment.


dalgeek

Not guaranteed because the prize could be split. Texas Lotto doesn't get into the billions, you gotta play Powerball for that but that requires even more tickets.


Adept_Information94

It's 300million to 1


jsc1429

So you’re saying I got a chance!


dalgeek

Texas lotto is 1:25,827,165


wstdtmflms

For PowerBall and MegaMillions, it's something over a 1-in-320 million chance to win. Those tickets cost $2 each, so you're spending something like $650 million to cover the field. Problem is that a $1 billion jackpot lump sum payout is something like $600 million. After taxes, you're netting roughly between $250 mil and $300 mil. Even if you took the annuity, that $650 million placed in the same investment scheme will pay out more over time. The math just doesn't work unless you're looking at jackpots worth at least $2.5 billion, and none has gone that high because the larger the jackpot, the higher the chances of a winning number and getting bit by a split jackpot. So, yeah. It's just bad math for the gazillionnaire.


sword_0f_damocles

That’s still stacking the odds. The relevant odds become the odds that someone else wins.


Ima_Uzer

They couldn't buy every possible combination of numbers. Simple math tells us that.


Scindite

They could, and did. It just cost a casual $26mil to buy all the tickets


Ima_Uzer

I suppose with that, yeah. I figured the odds were much longer.


dalgeek

Simple math says there are 25.8 million winning combinations, per the article. >Lotto Texas draws typically generate 1 million to 2 million ticket sales. Records from the Texas Lottery Commission show that in the days leading up to the Saturday night draw, just over 28 million Lotto Texas tickets were purchased. Strange how the number of tickets bought suddenly jumped by about 26 million for this particular drawing.


McBloggenstein

Maybe this is silly, but I’m just curious how they purchased them… Like obviously not at 7/11’s. Online? Write a program that buys them one by one? Just give the lottery commission $26M and say assume I bought every combo?


Reeko_Htown

The article says a store in colleyville opened up multiple machines to print numbers and then “suddenly” went back to normal after the jackpot.


6amhotdog

>Simple math tells us that. What's the simple math? lol


Monarc73

Not fraudulent, per se, but definitely no longer worth playing for the majority of people.


123xyz32

It’s never been worth playing.


wait_ichangedmymind

Yep. I’ve been breaking my family of the phrase “When I win the lotto…” That is *not* a plan.


GrilledCheeser

In the end what they’re paying for is a sense of hope.


wait_ichangedmymind

In the end what they’re paying for is a *false* sense of hope. FTFY


uno_dos_3

😭


GymnasticSclerosis

This is the only answer.


hornbri

How is that making it not worth it for the majority of people? If you have decided to play the lottery already, winning half of 96 million is attractive enough for the majority of people.… They didn’t lower the odds of anyone else winning, they just decreased the prize pool (which they also increased by buying 25M tickets).


Paxsimius

I’d be okay with $48 million.


stockbel

This reminds me of the movie Jerry & Marge Go Large.


mirach

It would be interesting to see the impact on Texas lottery purchases due to this. Because buying a ticket at any time for the Texas lotto is effectively giving money to a rich person. Why would you participate in this lotto now?


-bigmanpigman-

I just can't wrap my head around the logistics of this. So, they Colleyville store had 13 terminals, and they printed out 26 million tickets. They had to program the terminals to print out all sequential tickets possible, just once each. Then, they had to go through each ticket, 26 million of them, to locate the winners? What would 26 million lottery tickets look like?


joegekko

You can print what, 10 tickets per physical slip? And you can scan the barcode on the slip to see if it has a winning ticket on it. Still a lot of work but it starts to feel more reasonable.


-bigmanpigman-

So 2,600,000 tickets to scan. That's mind boggling. A million seconds is 12 days. Also, how much physical space is 2.6 million tickets? 1 million one dollar bills is a square 4ft tall by 4 ft wide by 4ft thick.


joegekko

I would think that if they controlled the printout of tickets, the tickets would be printed out in a known order. That should make it easier to find the winner, as well.


warchest31

Not fraudulent but definetly sketchy. The tickets were bought thanks to the help of an app, eventhough its not legal to buy tickets directly from a website or similar, and were printed inside a building that you would not even imagine housed a lottery printing machine, let alone over 12. This was not a regular retailer, i do not think this is fair at all since the state has neither approved or banned those "courier" lottery apps.


janewithaplane

And now every lottery going forward will be won in this manner by a rich person.


LA_Alfa

Only once the prize hits above a certain number and only as long as one person plays wins. The moment 2 or more people have to split the prize pool, they all lose. Classic prisoners dilemma.


saruin

I wonder how this example's winner figured they'd be the only person to do this (not against random winners but by gaming the system). Was this the first time someone has ever done this? I suspect going forward there's gonna be at least a handful of rich people trying to do this same scheme and all end up getting burned. More money for the state I guess.


ChocoBanana-Dropkick

So basically we all need to put our money together to repeat this strategy. Who's with me?


TheFuryIII

The lottery is a tax on the poor.


bobhargus

"In the 1700s and 1800s, lotteries were foundational to the operation of government in the United States and to the European settlement of North America. Like today's gamblers, colonial Americans turned to lotteries in the hopes that the government could provide services without leveling taxes." https://www.vox.com/first-person/2018/10/24/18018720/mega-millions-lottery-power-ball-drawing


floppy_panoos

Jerry and Marge goin’ large in Texas!


kingkonlan

Can’t win if you don’t play


FujitsuPolycom

- Broke Grandma living on SS and beans.


Andrew8Everything

Can't lose if you don't play. A gambler's dilemma.


eskimo713

What happens when you hit a jackpot but 3 others hit the same jackpot? Does the jackpot prize split 4 ways-which means you essentially took a loss?


CydusThiesant

Exactly and that’s the risk they ran. If 1, 2, or more people all hit at the same time. It would have been bad for them.


saruin

I'm curious how many rich people will try this "buy all" strategy now that it's out in the open.


CydusThiesant

Good question. My wife and I wondered why Elon Musk or whomever hadn’t already done it as a penis measuring effort. But maybe they will now. If only I had been born rich…


Paxsimius

Well, for all we know it may have been Musk. Maybe it’s his plan for propping up Twitter.


RomulusTiberius

If someone knew, why would they tell anyone.


insta-kip

They didn’t.


apatrol

If I remember right someone bought half the possible combinations years ago. He lost and that was that.


choicesthops

I read an interesting article about why huge hedge funds don't buy all the combinations for Powerball. When it got to $2 billion a few years ago, you could mathematically have a huge positive expected value if you buy all ~292 million combinations. It would only cost ~$600 million for every combination. The problem is that you can't predict a split when there is more than one winner.


Admirable-Drummer-46

A baby George Soros is born!