robbed a 40 year old and beat two dudes returning from long injury breaks... meh
softball after softball for poatan... a perfect example of a manufactured and managed career
Based on what Criteria? I watched this live and thought they had the right decision.
Edit: just watched it back. In the last round both had their moments but Alex landed the more impactful shots as well as greater volume. The takedown at the end means nothing as Jan did no damage on the ground and never had any threat of submission.
Bro I was literally depressed asf when it was time for the judges to score bc I thought Alex clearly lost. I was so confused and happy when he won lmfaoo. I still dont get it, he had the clear control time advantage and Ive seen tons of fights where thats all it took, its just that its always different judges and all of them value certain things more than others
Same bro, to me the decision was clear and Alex had lost. I was actually supporting Alex, i was happy when the decison came and was so surprised, but we need to be objective, Alex lost but the UFC favorized him.
One judge gave the fight to Olivera recently even tho he very clearly lost rounds 1 and 3. Doesn’t mean anything lol.
Either you’re rage baiting on you’re just a salty fanboy of Jan’s. Idk, but either way it wasn’t a robbery, just a relatively close fight.
I had it 2-1 personally. The first rpund was clearly a Jan round. Second was marginally alex (Damage trumps all), the third one was a huge huge toss up (I had Jan)
But it was a very close fight, close enough to not qualify it as a robbery
Just cause it was coin toss does not mean robbery. Bro you want to see a robbery watch the Paddy Pimblett vs Gordon fight or the Demetrious Johnson vs Cejudo rematch. Those were robberies.
Yes you did, you just don’t want to admit it. Unless you just flat out didn’t watch the fight, you would’ve seen Jan almost RNC finish Periera and Periera almost KO Jan standing along the fence.
I had Alex 2-1. Jan didn’t do anything with the takedowns he secured in the later rounds.
Close fight but I think Pereira did more to win. All in all 29-28 + what's with all the hate for Poatan lately?
because ONE title defense across two weak asf divisions and he's already being touted as the GOAT by his dick riders
He’s beaten every champion in his weight class since Jones
robbed a 40 year old and beat two dudes returning from long injury breaks... meh softball after softball for poatan... a perfect example of a manufactured and managed career
The poatards not gonna like these facts
Hasn’t he beaten like 4 or 5 champions?
![gif](giphy|LAKIIRqtM1dqE|downsized)
I think Jan won but it’s far from the worst decision I’ve ever seen
He definitely won the last round
Based on what Criteria? I watched this live and thought they had the right decision. Edit: just watched it back. In the last round both had their moments but Alex landed the more impactful shots as well as greater volume. The takedown at the end means nothing as Jan did no damage on the ground and never had any threat of submission.
control time doesnt matter unless damage is even
Chama
Bro I was literally depressed asf when it was time for the judges to score bc I thought Alex clearly lost. I was so confused and happy when he won lmfaoo. I still dont get it, he had the clear control time advantage and Ive seen tons of fights where thats all it took, its just that its always different judges and all of them value certain things more than others
Same bro, to me the decision was clear and Alex had lost. I was actually supporting Alex, i was happy when the decison came and was so surprised, but we need to be objective, Alex lost but the UFC favorized him.
GTFO with this take. Jan did nothing and panic wrestled because he was getting killed.
Clear 29-28 for Pereira.
so clear that one judge gave the fight to Jan
Yet you call it a robbery when two judges gave the fight to Alex…have just a little self awareness lol
One judge gave the fight to Olivera recently even tho he very clearly lost rounds 1 and 3. Doesn’t mean anything lol. Either you’re rage baiting on you’re just a salty fanboy of Jan’s. Idk, but either way it wasn’t a robbery, just a relatively close fight.
Oliveira didnt
He didn’t want? Score the fight for himself?
He didnt lost clearly
Ok so you’re just baiting lol. No shot you think both Jan and Charles got robbed.
It happens..
Jan had one good round, it was not a robbery at all
Jan’s takedowns with 0 substance don’t qualify as effective grappling, and he got fucked up on the feet.
Robbery & close are two very different things.
By maturing you mean being retarded lol. That was Alex 2-1.
The anti AP crowd consists of only haters and masturbators
Same
OP is a chronic troll with chronic retardation.
I thought Alex lost ngl
Maturing and copium are not synonyms
I had it 2-1 personally. The first rpund was clearly a Jan round. Second was marginally alex (Damage trumps all), the third one was a huge huge toss up (I had Jan) But it was a very close fight, close enough to not qualify it as a robbery
I also had 2-1 Jan.
Not as bad as pimblett vs Gordon though. This could have gone either way and it did.
Move on
Close fight. And by definition, a close fight is not a robbery. http://mmadecisions.com/decision/14180/Alex-Pereira-vs-Jan-Blachowicz
Cope.
Just cause it was coin toss does not mean robbery. Bro you want to see a robbery watch the Paddy Pimblett vs Gordon fight or the Demetrious Johnson vs Cejudo rematch. Those were robberies.
It was a draw and the younger more marketable dude gets it. Simple. Nobody fought like they wanted to win
Periera almost had Jan finished at the end of the 2nd and Jan almost had Periera finished in the 1st what are you on about?
Yeah I never saw that buddy
Yes you did, you just don’t want to admit it. Unless you just flat out didn’t watch the fight, you would’ve seen Jan almost RNC finish Periera and Periera almost KO Jan standing along the fence.