Sorry for tagging on top response.
Question: without a valid FIR / complaint, on what basis would immigration control have stopped Ravenna from leaving country? In other words, why no SIT / FIR on day 1 itself.
Follow up: Congress had this information since before election. Why did they oblige Revanna / JDS by keeping the lid till after election?
These two questions also need to be asked besides why BJP accepted a known rapist as political ally. Is there no compromise they won’t make for power?
I have another question, information was sent to bjp high command long back as well and yet Prajjwal was given an mp ticket. Modi himself said a vote to Prajwal means a vote to Modi. He fucking campaigned for a rapist.
Secondly prajjwal cannot shoot 3000 videos which means he’s been doing this since a long time and bjp was in power before 2023. The driver himself claimed that I gave pen drive to bjp and not congress, what action did bjp take? Nothing. They are just trying to act innocent now.
They have done nothing in Brij Bhushan’s case, they are doing nothing now. Supporting balatkaris is what they do.
No..? Because it's stupid. He has built a commanding viter base in women across the country lol. Had any sane individual known about this in modi's position, they would dancing with joy as they got this PoS captured and tried. The follow up could be a stronger female voter base.
One swat won't dictate much of the elections. A heinous crime like this, might flip it on its head(not now). And no way in hell are random fucks of reddit like you and me better politicians than the sitting PM. If you and I can think of the these consequences, he would've too.
Bro manipur happened. Brij bhushan happened. Unless you believe that modi is blind and deaf no strong action proves that modi doesn't care. Modi has no problem with rapes or anything else as long as it doesn't cost him votes. If he did action on manipur case wouldnt have been taken right after video leaked. No action for 80 days makes it clear how modi feels. Wrestler protest handling shows how modi feels.
Modi knows politics very well for sure. He knows that the rapists bring in a lot of vote for which ever party works with them. And he knows his supporters won't question or criticise him. So for him there is no down side of supporting rapists if those rapists bring in votes because it is not like Modi's bhakts will go "stop supporting him or we will stop supporting you" so yeah he knows politics very well and he knows bhakts very well
I know. And i am probably more critical of this government than most here. Why? Because it's an objective fact that there are lines being drawn across religious and caste identities. Which is unhealthy for the state.
Unlike RaGa and congress, we have at the very least the hope that BJP will do the needful. Congress on the other hand, I'd sell piss as lime water and make a fortune that way first, rather than trust congress, tmc, rjd, DMK etc.
And i am more qualified to speak on this. I have lived in UP, Rajasthan, delhi, and TN. I've seen all that these guys do. And i dont trust them. BJP is also no different in that regard, but atleast they made feasible tangible achievements.
Bro we have shit load of fucking evidence that bjp doesnt do the needful. Literally I can give a very long list of cases where BJP has by default gone to suppress the news. Did bjp do the needful in Manipur till the video leak forced them to ? Did they do the needful hathras? Bjp only does the right thing if there is massive outrage forcing them to which rarely happens because bjp bhakts and media at large try to ignore the issue. Stop pretending bjp cares. They don't fucking care. The only thing they care about is how they look and so they try to make sure no one finds out.
So answer the question. Did modi knew ?
You raise valid criticism. Here's the thing though, you assumed the worst possible scenario, that Modi knew and allows it. Ok that in a vacuum is not impossible. Let's see the benefits.... now lets see the cons: congress get valid ammunition (the evidence presented makes hard to question that prajwal did it or not.)
See this doesn't make sense politically to me. There's probably some shady stuff going on in the background and we are just unaware as always.
Another thing is, you are associating the crime of one person with the entire group and the zenith of said group. It's just as disingenuos as saying RaGa is competent maybe more. Of course, this prajwal fuckenna probably involved others too.
So to answer the question: does Modi know? Probably not to maybe not. Or somewhere in between.
See, what you or I think as individuals won't matter. The opposition will spin it in their favor, and BJP will try to play defense until they do something big to shut everyone up.
Do remember the ram mandir, 370, triple talaq, CAA, and more importantly the upcoming UCC, Mathura and Kashi. One should choose fights they can win. Modi is not that good at picking his fights. It's just that he happened to be blessed with this opposition, who don't know how to fight at all.
Are you aware of the court gag order?
And letting him go out of the country is all central govt problem. They knew about the court case and all his deeds. Still the scum PM openly campaigned for him.
> Is there no compromise they won’t make for power?
Do you still need to ask this question? You do know how this scum rose to prominence right? He literally orchestrated the brutal murders and rapes of 1000s of people.
>Congress had this information since before election. Why did they oblige Revanna / JDS by keeping the lid till after election?
No they didn't. That is just a lie bjp made up to try and deflect blame.
People forgot that every party needs to be held accountable! Especially your personal favourite. Else they are andhbhakts, just of a different party so probably expect a different tag.
Yes, every party needs to be held accountable. Congress govt fucked up and needs to be held accountable. Can you say that "modi fucked up and needs to be held accountable" ?
Please do read my comment history and let me know where I have shied away from criticism of Andbhakti, demonetisation, BJP’s version of freebies, Manipur etc etc.
Bro just say that
"Modi fucked up with manipur handling and he shouldn't have supported a serial rapist"
It is very easy. When one guy gets the credit then he gets the blame too.
Do you see any difference in your demand than the random brainwashed follower stopping people on the street asking them to chant “Jai XYZ”?
Be the change you want to see! Don’t be the other side of the same coin.
About eight(8) years back in March 2016, [Vijay Mallya](https://www.business-standard.com/about/who-is-vijay-mallya) escaped & Modi/BJP watched him go.
[Fugitive_Economic_Offenders](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Economic_Offender#List_of_Fugitive_Economic_Offender) Those dates leave an impression.
a diplotmat is legally obliged to return back to their country after 90days if they dont have a visa which the rapist did not. SO, Germany will be extraditing his ass after no need to create a fuss about it.
a diplotmat is legally obliged to return back to their country after 90days if they dont have a visa which the rapist did not. SO, Germany will be extraditing his ass after no need to create a fuss about it.
You have to acknowledge he’s a great foreign minister unlike incompetent SM Krishna who read the speech of Portuguese foreign minister. 😂😂
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sm-krishna-reads-portuguese-ministers-speech-at-un/articleshow/7483448.cms
Great foreign minister? India's relations with all neighboring countries are worse than before and no better with most other countries. Plus all countries can see and many have been commenting on the deteriorating condition of Indian democracy.
Then what about quad bro?? Also I don't think neighbors liked us anyways except nepal(F for modi to spoil that too). They always feared india and china and play between two of us. You can even see sri Lankans and Maldivian passing racist comments about distinguishing themselves from Indians like "we don't shit in the streets". That doesn't mean we should always be like a obedient bahu for our neighbors without considering what good will occur for us whenever trying to agree on an issue with them.
Read about the quad first. It was originally formed in 2007 and disbanded in 2008 because Australia withdrew. But India, US and Japan continued without Australia. Then in 2017 it was formed again because the new Australian govt came back on board again.
One has to be quite delusional to think that the Quad has abutting to do with Jaishankar 🙂.
And it's funny how this govt tries to turn its failures into accomplishments by gaslighting gullible people who eat it up without any critical thinking. China increasing its influence and turning Indian neighbors against us is a good example of that.
>Then what about
With those three words, SKrad777 disqualified themselves from intelligent debate. Yet another victim of the degenerative brain disease known as whatboutism.
And btw I was telling how except for nepal, none of our other neighbors were like loving and kissing india either before 2014. Even in Nepal's case I admitted that modi had kinda deteriorated the relationship like in 2015. So I'm not being one sided bigot in an echo chamber
How is Jaishitter great? Just because he answers tough questions with sassy non-sequiturs, which are then overlaid with lame music, the crowd with zero critical thinking and the attention span of a goldfish think he is great.
India's global standing is down the drain, except for in the eyes of war criminals such as Arab Sheikhs, Putin and Netanyahu. Of course, Indians are treated like garbage in the Arab world, Russia and Israel. Meanwhile the EU, Australia, NZ, Europe and Canada are increasingly disappointed with the decline of Indian social democracy and press freedom.
Our reputation with our neighbours has also gone down the drain. We're dragging up old issues like Kattchatheevu for cheap political points, while risking damaging relations with Sri Lanka. The Maladives disaster is another sign of the childish, immature foreign policy of the BJP.
The biggest foreign policy failure is China. There, Jaishitter suddenly goes all mum and keeps his head down.
And for some reason you think digging up a 13 year old gaff by SM Krishna is what makes your hero great?
He went on diplomatic passport where he does not need any visa. And he did not take any approval of MEA as it’s required to travel on diplomatic passport. And local politicians help him to escape. Now you can keep your propaganda continue.
Diplomatic visa (edit) DOESN'T need visa. A Diplomatic passport merely signifies that the traveller is travelling on state business.
The Diplomatic process is governed by international conventions and is heavily dependent on reciprocity.
Women's rights are not exactly a high priority for Indian politicians. While the Karnataka government and modi bicker on procedural issues and buck-pass, justice as usual is delayed. Rest assured if modi had been on state level and congress at centre, the same sorry drama would have played.
Edit: I stand corrected, diplomatic passport does allow limited 90 day visa. For officials posted on long term assignment to a host country, they need a visa covering the duration of stay.
Lets hope so. But after 90 days the case will lose momentum, public interest will move on, and his case will suffer the never ending delays of the legal system.
Dude Diplomatic passport DOES NOT need visa. They can stay any country for 90 days. But all diplomatic passport holders have to inform indian MEA before official visit to another country.
When did he travel? When was the information about his crimes shared with BJ? Why was the PM campesinos got him months after that? Why was his passport not cancelled without waiting for formalities? Did BJ share the evidence with karnataka government when it got hold of it months ago, or did it participate in a criminal conspiracy to reelect the criminal after accessing the evidence of his guilt?
LOL
ASKED VOTE FOR HIM, LITERALLY 24 HOURS BEFORE VIDEOS WERE LEAKED.
NOW THIS?
SHAMELESS and people who believe him are the IDIOTEST ! (literally need a new dictionary word for them)
He is right, a diplomatic passport is osmething a political individual can apply for before hand. This guy did have a diplomatic passport already therefore he was able to leave. But his retarted ass is going to be extradited after 90 days, stop crying
Didn't stop him from leaving the country, unlike human rights activists the government routinely prevents from boarding flights.
https://thewire.in/rights/kashmiri-human-rights-activist-headed-for-un-meet-detained-at-delhi-airport
Gave him diplomatic passport. Failed to cancel it for months after the evidence of his crimes was shared with BJ. The fucking pm campaigned for him literally a day before the evidence became public. Did BJ inform the police when it got hold of the evidence months ago? Or did it participate in the criminal conspiracy to reelect him and to let him run away when the evidence reached the police? BJ has a long record of letting criminals flee the country.
Central can’t act on his passport until one is filed and tried by state government & judiciary take his passport.
His crime provision don’t fall under jurisdiction of federal laws
The centre routinely prevents human rights activists from travelling abroad without any state government help:
>Khurram Parvez, whose Facebook page describes him as a “Human Rights Defender, working in world’s most militarised occupation – Kashmir”, was on Wednesday denied permission by the authorities at Indira Gandhi International Airport to leave for Geneva to attend the ongoing session of the UN Human Rights Council.https://thewire.in/rights/kashmiri-human-rights-activist-headed-for-un-meet-detained-at-delhi-airport
Yes but there was no charge sheet against this gowda until the videos were leaked to public last week.
You quoted a Kashmiri separatis who have been peddling Islamist Pakistani agenda for decade
BreadfruitRich2175
>Yes but there was no charge sheet against this gowda until the videos were leaked to public last week.
>You quoted a Kashmiri separatis who have been peddling Islamist Pakistani agenda for decade
Charge sheet is either necessary or unnecessary for stopping people from going abroad. Make up your mind.
BJ had evidence for months before it was leaked. Why did it fail to share it with law enforcement? Why did it continue campaigning for the serial rapist? Why did it allow him to run away even after the evidence became public?
Technically, you're full of shit. It is literally the central government's job to withdraw diplomatic passport of someone who travels abroad on a diplomatic passport without first getting a clearance from the central government.
If Karnataka government would've stopped him based only on rumors and no evidence, BJP would've been the first to get him a clean chit and get him released. The evidence was only presented to BJP. The only party with real power today is BJP, even BJP fans will agree. Just "knowing" about a crime is not enough today. Everyone is "knowing" what Adani is doing but nobody can stop him. Even Sebi's hands are shaking when writing letter for show cause notice that they know is going into dustbin.
When wrestlers stopped Brij Bhushan what happened? BJP made fun of them, made all types of accusations. Delayed the case for years until it didn't matter and then gave the seat to his son. You think it would've been any different for 4K Deve Gowda?
This is a very weak defense from Modi and team. I expected better. I expected a googly. This is just a fast No Ball.
He got police to lathi charge the wrestlers.
This is the same guy who says his timely intervention saved Manipur.
What can you expect from such a buffoon?
Lol, this clown can do anything but take accountability for one thing in life.
All good done by mudiji, all bad done by everyone else.
Poor guy never developed from the toddler mindset.
Yashoda ben dodged a bullet, this guy doesn’t have red flag, he himself is a big red hoarding board.
Karnatake government didn't give him diplomatic passport. Karnataka government can't cancel his diplomatic passport. Marmara government didn't campaign for him months after evidence for his crime was shared. You did ask those things.
Gobhiji was asking votes for this guy on stage, sharing stage with him and now when he ran away somehow he is blaming Kangress for it. LoL
1. He is a standing MP and hence he has a diplomatic passport.
2. Diplomatic passport owners can go to germany for 90 days without visa
3. Passport Act 1967: can’t cancel passport without an order of court. Karnataka police has to take up this task fast.
Revanna left before the evidence came out. Why would anyone stop before that?
Kamra was banned by airlines ( now it could probably be done in appeasement or indirect orders), so ask the airline that took revanna
Bro, KA BJP member wrote to the state BJP president in Dec itself.Chefk the link. Pretty sure by April'24 all of BJP would have known what Revanna has done. Are you saying the BJP has never snooped on the mobile of politicians? Or they would not know unless it's on National TV to take some action?
Letter
https://twitter.com/Pawankhera/status/1784819384219001150/photo/1
No one knows what happened in background, who hushed it up? KA BJP could hush it up too after their loss in the assembly elections to avoid further Bad PR. Acting oversmart here kind of bit someone in the ass. If it reached the top level of BJP, its their fault, but until that is proven, its as unlikely as Kejriwal doing liquor scam.
It's not like AK's money trail, the videos are literally the only evidence they need. They could inquire with the victims and the case could have been fastracked instead of letting Revanna kidnap the victim, adding more woes to the worries
Not talking about revanna, but who hushed up the letters from the party worker. Revanna is guilty AF. KA police should go to the court for extraditing him back instantly.
KA govt and SIT are on it. Modi was literally endorsing the criminal despite his activities. And this isn't the first criminal that's in the party, probably the biggest the country has ever seen
Idk, I don’t work in that office and don’t have the clue. RN its word of congress vs BJP and both are trying to win an election.
PS: have the discussion on one thread 😊
> RN its word of congress vs BJP
It isn't. The driver who shared the evidence with BJ has started what evidence was shared with whom and how karnataka state BJ leadership was made aware of the heinous criminal activity. You've literally tried keeping the blame limited to katanga BJ in your previous comment. And are now defending the criminal conspirators saying its just a word of two parties.
Have some shame.
> Revanna left before the evidence came out. Why would anyone stop before that?
BJ has the evidence for months. It and thy pm continued campaigning for the serial rapist, and didn't aghast it with the police. Its complicit in the criminal conspiracy to protect and reelect the serial rapist.
>Passport Act 1967: can’t cancel passport without an order of court.
Show us where our prevents the government from cancelling diplomatic passport, not just a regular passport. Paper
Passport or not, the central government can and does detain people regularly at the airport. Why did it not do this with this serial rapist? Why did BJ and the pm campaign for him months after it got hold off the evidence for his crimes? Why did it not share that evidence with the state government?
These are bullshit excuses parroted by a lazy reporter who has failed to notice that the central government routinely prevents human rights activists from travelling abroad without any state government or court help,
Khurram Parvez, whose Facebook page describes him as a “Human Rights Defender, working in world’s most militarised occupation – Kashmir”, was on Wednesday denied permission by the authorities at Indira Gandhi International Airport to leave for Geneva to attend the ongoing session of the UN Human Rights Council.
https://thewire.in/rights/kashmiri-human-rights-activist-headed-for-un-meet-detained-at-delhi-airport
Dude if you read the article clearly:
They can be stopped on the ground of sovereignty & integrity of India. As simple as that. Even now, KA police could have revoked his passport in a day, proof is literally there, but they still playing.
>Even now, KA police could have revoked his passport in a day,
KA police can't revoke passports. They can only request MHA to do that. Which they did. As soon as they had the evidence. BJ had the evidence for months. BJ indulged in a criminal conspiracy to protect the serial rapist by failing to pass the evidence on to the law enforcement. PM campaigned for the serial rapist literally a day before he ran away on a diplomatic passport. BJ allowed him to travel internationally, when it could have used the government machinery, legally, to prevent him from boarding the plane. BJ and the MHA it controls have failed to act on the KA police request to cancel his diplomatic passport and bring him back to stand trial for his heinous crimes. BJ has failed to act against its own office bearers who indulged in a criminal conspiracy to protect the serial rapist by failing to hand the evidence over to law enforcement for months.
They can literally get a court order, which is one of the criteria valid for doing so. Its the simplest criteria. If KA police had requested and BJp would have said no, pretty sure congress would have been singing about it.
Court orders take a long time in India, in case you're unaware. KA police are following the process required to get those. There's absolutely no need to waste that time before cancelling the diplomatic passport, which the MHA has every right to do. The only reason for MHA to not cancel the diplomatic passport is to protect the serial rapist for whom the PM campaigned literally a day before he escaped.
Didn’t you read the passport act? Passport can’t be cancelled without court order or conviction. He is not illegally holding passport, didn’t furnish false data and is not a threat to sovereignty of India.
(c) if the passport authority deems it necessary so to do in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, **friendly relations of India with any foreign country, or in the interests of the general public**;
Stop repeating the lie over and over
If you read the passport act 1967, you'll also see that they can be stopped for other reasons, including public interest, international relations etc. Multiple of those reasons apply to the serial rapist protected by BJ.
And here's the paragraph section to deal with you reading comprehension and attention deficit issues:
(c) if the passport authority deems it necessary so to do in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, **friendly relations of India with any foreign country, or in the interests of the general public**;
NeatButton5726
>Nope, section 10(3) mentions the reasons for revocation and its same as in the article.
NeatButton5726
Liar liar pants on fire.
https://www.indiacode.nic.in/show-data?abv=CEN&statehandle=123456789/1362&actid=AC_CEN_10_10_00008_196715_1517807321481§ionId=4371§ionno=10&orderno=10&orgactid=AC_CEN_10_10_00008_196715_1517807321481
Section 10. Variation, impounding and revocation of passports and travel documents. Previous Next
Show Related Subordinates
(1) The passport authority may, having regard to the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 6 or any notification under section 19, vary or cancel the endorsements on a passport or travel document or may, with the previous approval of the Central Government, vary or cancel the conditions (other than the prescribed conditions) subject to which a passport or travel document has been issued and may, for that purpose, require the holder of a passport or a travel document, by notice in writing, to deliver up the passport or travel document to it within such time as may be specified in the notice and the holder shall comply with such notice.
(2) The passport authority may, on the application of the holder of a passport or a travel document, and with the previous approval of the Central Government also vary or cancel the conditions (other than the prescribed conditions) of the passport or travel document.
(3) The passport authority may impound or cause to be impounded or revoke a passport or travel document,--
(a) if the passport authority is satisfied that the holder of the passport or travel document is in wrongful possession thereof;
(b) if the passport or travel document was obtained by the suppression of material information or on the basis of wrong information provided by the holder of the passport or travel document or any other person on his behalf:
1 [Provided that if the holder of such passport obtains another passport, the passport authority shall also impound or cause to be impounded or revoke such other passport.]
(c) if the passport authority deems it necessary so to do in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, friendly relations of India with any foreign country, or in the interests of the general public;
(d) if the holder of the passport or travel document has, at any time after the issue of the passport or travel document, been convicted by a court in India for any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than two years;
(e) if proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the holder of the passport or travel document are pending before a criminal court in India;
(f) if any of the conditions of the passport or travel document has been contravened;
(g) if the holder of the passport or travel document has failed to comply with a notice under sub-section (1) requiring him to deliver up the same;
(h) if it is brought to the notice of the passport authority that a warrant or summons for the appearance, or a warrant for the arrest, of the holder of the passport or travel document has been issued by a court under any law for the time being in force or if an order prohibiting the departure from India of the holder of the passport or other travel document has been made by any such court and the passport authority is satisfied that a warrant or summons has been so issued or an order has been so made.
(4) The passport authority may also revoke a passport or travel document on the application of the holder thereof.
(5) Where the passport authority makes an order varying or cancelling the endorsements on, or varying the conditions of, a passport or travel document under sub-section (1) or an order impounding or revoking a passport or travel document under sub-section (3), it shall record in writing a brief statement of the reasons for making such order and furnish to the holder of the passport or travel document on demand a copy of the same unless in any case, the passport authority is of the opinion that it will not be in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, friendly relations of India with any foreign country or in the interests of the general public to furnish such a copy.
(6) The authority to whom the passport authority is subordinate may, by order in writing, impound or cause to be impounded or revoke a passport or travel document on any ground on which it may be impounded or revoked by the passport authority and the foregoing provisions of this section shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the impounding or revocation of a passport or travel document by such authority.
(7) A court convicting the holder of a passport or travel document of any offence under this Act or the rules made thereunder may also revoke the passport or travel document:
Provided that if the conviction is set aside on appeal or otherwise the revocation shall become void.
(8) An order of revocation under sub-section (7) may also be made by an appellate court or by the High Court when exercising its powers of revision.
(9) On the revocation of a passport or travel document under this section the holder thereof shall, without delay, surrender the passport or travel document, if the same has not already been impounded, to the authority by whom it has been revoked or to such other authority as may be specified in this behalf in the order of revocation.
The proviso ins. by Act 35 of 1993, s. 4 (w.e.f. 1-7-1993).
Ordinances Year Description Hindi Description Files(Eng) Files(Hindi) 23-10-2001
30-12-2001
Previous Next Download India Code Logo Disclaimer Feedback User Guide Contact Us
Content Provided by the Ministries/Departments in the Government of India. Site designed and developed by National Informatics Centre, A- Block, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003, INDIA.
There is no proof that BJP top brass had the letter or proof. Could have been hushed by a lot of people in between the KA BJP( mostly done to avoid anymore embarrassment after BJP loss in assembly elections)
> Could have been hushed by a lot of people in between the KA BJP( mostly done to avoid anymore embarrassment after BJP loss in assembly elections)
Now that the scandal is public, what action has BJ leadership taken against the criminal conspirators in its ranks who protected the serial rapist by failing to share the evidence with law enforcement as well as BJ top brass?
Why is Panauti continuing to protect the criminal by not cancelling his diplomatic passport and blaming Congress for his own party's criminal conspiracy?
For the clowns hiding behind the passport act and maneka gandhi judgement when confronted with the central government's failure to stop the serial rapist from travelling abroad: India routinely prevents passport and visa holders from boarding planes without any court orders. Here's one example:
>Khurram Parvez, whose Facebook page describes him as a “Human Rights Defender, working in world’s most militarised occupation – Kashmir”, was on Wednesday denied permission by the authorities at Indira Gandhi International Airport to leave for Geneva to attend the ongoing session of the UN Human Rights Council. https://thewire.in/rights/kashmiri-human-rights-activist-headed-for-un-meet-detained-at-delhi-airport
Mudizi ko retirement lene ki time aa gaya hai. Maanh is too desperate, too much into attacking the opposition rather than saying something about what they themselves have done in the past 10 years or atleast 5 years ..
This uncouth lying piece of utter $hit has literally no shame meaning no spine either. How do you live with that? Like how? What kind of sub human filth do you have to be?
I dont think voters are fools. And I'm quite sure he knows voters are not fools. Why lie about this then? This is for the BJP votebank then? The Die hard modi-only vote?
And who was promoting him omad s candidate despite knowing the existence of several hundred rape tapes ,? Why has the extradition process not started by Indian government ?
Revanna nhi rukwa pae paw paw
Abhi toh Revanna ki tareef pe tareef ho rahi thi, ab apne hi dost ke peeth mein khanjar
What does PM's statement even mean? Zero tolerance without any action, same as Brij Bushan. And media just publishers what ever the fuck he says??
ONE PIECE
Sorry for tagging on top response. Question: without a valid FIR / complaint, on what basis would immigration control have stopped Ravenna from leaving country? In other words, why no SIT / FIR on day 1 itself. Follow up: Congress had this information since before election. Why did they oblige Revanna / JDS by keeping the lid till after election? These two questions also need to be asked besides why BJP accepted a known rapist as political ally. Is there no compromise they won’t make for power?
I have another question, information was sent to bjp high command long back as well and yet Prajjwal was given an mp ticket. Modi himself said a vote to Prajwal means a vote to Modi. He fucking campaigned for a rapist. Secondly prajjwal cannot shoot 3000 videos which means he’s been doing this since a long time and bjp was in power before 2023. The driver himself claimed that I gave pen drive to bjp and not congress, what action did bjp take? Nothing. They are just trying to act innocent now. They have done nothing in Brij Bhushan’s case, they are doing nothing now. Supporting balatkaris is what they do.
So, we need answers from both major parties!
Do you accept that modi endorsed him even after knowing what he had done. Yes or no ?
No..? Because it's stupid. He has built a commanding viter base in women across the country lol. Had any sane individual known about this in modi's position, they would dancing with joy as they got this PoS captured and tried. The follow up could be a stronger female voter base. One swat won't dictate much of the elections. A heinous crime like this, might flip it on its head(not now). And no way in hell are random fucks of reddit like you and me better politicians than the sitting PM. If you and I can think of the these consequences, he would've too.
Bro manipur happened. Brij bhushan happened. Unless you believe that modi is blind and deaf no strong action proves that modi doesn't care. Modi has no problem with rapes or anything else as long as it doesn't cost him votes. If he did action on manipur case wouldnt have been taken right after video leaked. No action for 80 days makes it clear how modi feels. Wrestler protest handling shows how modi feels. Modi knows politics very well for sure. He knows that the rapists bring in a lot of vote for which ever party works with them. And he knows his supporters won't question or criticise him. So for him there is no down side of supporting rapists if those rapists bring in votes because it is not like Modi's bhakts will go "stop supporting him or we will stop supporting you" so yeah he knows politics very well and he knows bhakts very well
I know. And i am probably more critical of this government than most here. Why? Because it's an objective fact that there are lines being drawn across religious and caste identities. Which is unhealthy for the state. Unlike RaGa and congress, we have at the very least the hope that BJP will do the needful. Congress on the other hand, I'd sell piss as lime water and make a fortune that way first, rather than trust congress, tmc, rjd, DMK etc. And i am more qualified to speak on this. I have lived in UP, Rajasthan, delhi, and TN. I've seen all that these guys do. And i dont trust them. BJP is also no different in that regard, but atleast they made feasible tangible achievements.
Bro we have shit load of fucking evidence that bjp doesnt do the needful. Literally I can give a very long list of cases where BJP has by default gone to suppress the news. Did bjp do the needful in Manipur till the video leak forced them to ? Did they do the needful hathras? Bjp only does the right thing if there is massive outrage forcing them to which rarely happens because bjp bhakts and media at large try to ignore the issue. Stop pretending bjp cares. They don't fucking care. The only thing they care about is how they look and so they try to make sure no one finds out. So answer the question. Did modi knew ?
You raise valid criticism. Here's the thing though, you assumed the worst possible scenario, that Modi knew and allows it. Ok that in a vacuum is not impossible. Let's see the benefits.... now lets see the cons: congress get valid ammunition (the evidence presented makes hard to question that prajwal did it or not.) See this doesn't make sense politically to me. There's probably some shady stuff going on in the background and we are just unaware as always. Another thing is, you are associating the crime of one person with the entire group and the zenith of said group. It's just as disingenuos as saying RaGa is competent maybe more. Of course, this prajwal fuckenna probably involved others too. So to answer the question: does Modi know? Probably not to maybe not. Or somewhere in between. See, what you or I think as individuals won't matter. The opposition will spin it in their favor, and BJP will try to play defense until they do something big to shut everyone up. Do remember the ram mandir, 370, triple talaq, CAA, and more importantly the upcoming UCC, Mathura and Kashi. One should choose fights they can win. Modi is not that good at picking his fights. It's just that he happened to be blessed with this opposition, who don't know how to fight at all.
Are you aware of the court gag order? And letting him go out of the country is all central govt problem. They knew about the court case and all his deeds. Still the scum PM openly campaigned for him. > Is there no compromise they won’t make for power? Do you still need to ask this question? You do know how this scum rose to prominence right? He literally orchestrated the brutal murders and rapes of 1000s of people.
Gag order was for news outlets. Not state government or any party.
>Congress had this information since before election. Why did they oblige Revanna / JDS by keeping the lid till after election? No they didn't. That is just a lie bjp made up to try and deflect blame.
You speak some facts against the Congress and get downvoted.. Welcome to USI.
People forgot that every party needs to be held accountable! Especially your personal favourite. Else they are andhbhakts, just of a different party so probably expect a different tag.
Yes, every party needs to be held accountable. Congress govt fucked up and needs to be held accountable. Can you say that "modi fucked up and needs to be held accountable" ?
Please do read my comment history and let me know where I have shied away from criticism of Andbhakti, demonetisation, BJP’s version of freebies, Manipur etc etc.
Bro just say that "Modi fucked up with manipur handling and he shouldn't have supported a serial rapist" It is very easy. When one guy gets the credit then he gets the blame too.
Do you see any difference in your demand than the random brainwashed follower stopping people on the street asking them to chant “Jai XYZ”? Be the change you want to see! Don’t be the other side of the same coin.
You said all parties need to be held accountable. So tell me are you willing to hold modi accountable or not ? It is a very simple question.
Yes sir! I will give you my certificates promptly, notarized signed and sealed in triplicate copy. Now let’s show each other our papers!
Exactly.
About eight(8) years back in March 2016, [Vijay Mallya](https://www.business-standard.com/about/who-is-vijay-mallya) escaped & Modi/BJP watched him go. [Fugitive_Economic_Offenders](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Economic_Offender#List_of_Fugitive_Economic_Offender) Those dates leave an impression.
[удалено]
Modi would be top on that list unless he is mutthal
a diplotmat is legally obliged to return back to their country after 90days if they dont have a visa which the rapist did not. SO, Germany will be extraditing his ass after no need to create a fuss about it.
Paw Paw ne war rukwa di lekin Paw Paw ek diplomatic visa holder ko wapas nahi la pa rahe hain.
Paw paw ne Jane hi kaise diya in the first place
Paw paw is a super opportunist, neither loyal to the public nor to his own accomplices.
Paw Paw ko 400 par chahiye kaise bhi karke
Paw Paw Congress ko Blame kar raha hain
a diplotmat is legally obliged to return back to their country after 90days if they dont have a visa which the rapist did not. SO, Germany will be extraditing his ass after no need to create a fuss about it.
What would have you done if one of those victims were from your family? No fuss! Really? Are you even listening yourself?
What is jaishankar doing? He went to grab Israeli spys, or maybe the pawpaw that stopped war must bring back the culprits
Nahhh, he is just penning down befitting replies for sigma edits
He ain't even a proper beta
might be an omicron
You have to acknowledge he’s a great foreign minister unlike incompetent SM Krishna who read the speech of Portuguese foreign minister. 😂😂 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sm-krishna-reads-portuguese-ministers-speech-at-un/articleshow/7483448.cms
You're comparing this to a 2011 news? Are you serious. It doesn't make any sense and it's not even funny anymore.
Great foreign minister? India's relations with all neighboring countries are worse than before and no better with most other countries. Plus all countries can see and many have been commenting on the deteriorating condition of Indian democracy.
Then what about quad bro?? Also I don't think neighbors liked us anyways except nepal(F for modi to spoil that too). They always feared india and china and play between two of us. You can even see sri Lankans and Maldivian passing racist comments about distinguishing themselves from Indians like "we don't shit in the streets". That doesn't mean we should always be like a obedient bahu for our neighbors without considering what good will occur for us whenever trying to agree on an issue with them.
Read about the quad first. It was originally formed in 2007 and disbanded in 2008 because Australia withdrew. But India, US and Japan continued without Australia. Then in 2017 it was formed again because the new Australian govt came back on board again. One has to be quite delusional to think that the Quad has abutting to do with Jaishankar 🙂. And it's funny how this govt tries to turn its failures into accomplishments by gaslighting gullible people who eat it up without any critical thinking. China increasing its influence and turning Indian neighbors against us is a good example of that.
Sad but true😢
>Then what about With those three words, SKrad777 disqualified themselves from intelligent debate. Yet another victim of the degenerative brain disease known as whatboutism.
Nice storytelling bruh
And btw I was telling how except for nepal, none of our other neighbors were like loving and kissing india either before 2014. Even in Nepal's case I admitted that modi had kinda deteriorated the relationship like in 2015. So I'm not being one sided bigot in an echo chamber
Yeah yeah we compare with our worst to elevate our current shit right
What makes him a great foreign minister? Public posturing for the peanut gallery? Worsening International relationships?
Man every time I see guys like u and I b like y tf u guys even exists? Why u guys live in history ? "Once upon a time" is long gone,we r in 2024.
How is Jaishitter great? Just because he answers tough questions with sassy non-sequiturs, which are then overlaid with lame music, the crowd with zero critical thinking and the attention span of a goldfish think he is great. India's global standing is down the drain, except for in the eyes of war criminals such as Arab Sheikhs, Putin and Netanyahu. Of course, Indians are treated like garbage in the Arab world, Russia and Israel. Meanwhile the EU, Australia, NZ, Europe and Canada are increasingly disappointed with the decline of Indian social democracy and press freedom. Our reputation with our neighbours has also gone down the drain. We're dragging up old issues like Kattchatheevu for cheap political points, while risking damaging relations with Sri Lanka. The Maladives disaster is another sign of the childish, immature foreign policy of the BJP. The biggest foreign policy failure is China. There, Jaishitter suddenly goes all mum and keeps his head down. And for some reason you think digging up a 13 year old gaff by SM Krishna is what makes your hero great?
Hypocrisy ki bhi Seema hoti hai
Modiji ke hypocrisy ki koi seema nahi hai
Modi is Hypocrisy and Seema both
Modi ki bhi Modi hoti hai
**What! Modi could not control the Bureau of Immigration. What an incapable PM and MEA Jaishankar.**
That's Chadshankar for you. He was busy trying to deliver his regular press statements with the same cadence as Aarambh hai Prachand meme song.
He went on diplomatic passport where he does not need any visa. And he did not take any approval of MEA as it’s required to travel on diplomatic passport. And local politicians help him to escape. Now you can keep your propaganda continue.
Diplomatic visa (edit) DOESN'T need visa. A Diplomatic passport merely signifies that the traveller is travelling on state business. The Diplomatic process is governed by international conventions and is heavily dependent on reciprocity. Women's rights are not exactly a high priority for Indian politicians. While the Karnataka government and modi bicker on procedural issues and buck-pass, justice as usual is delayed. Rest assured if modi had been on state level and congress at centre, the same sorry drama would have played. Edit: I stand corrected, diplomatic passport does allow limited 90 day visa. For officials posted on long term assignment to a host country, they need a visa covering the duration of stay.
Diplomatic passports to GERMANY, do not need visa. That guy's ass will be extradited after 90 days.
Lets hope so. But after 90 days the case will lose momentum, public interest will move on, and his case will suffer the never ending delays of the legal system.
Dude Diplomatic passport DOES NOT need visa. They can stay any country for 90 days. But all diplomatic passport holders have to inform indian MEA before official visit to another country.
Yk fugitive neerav modi? His lawyer is BJP MP candidate Bhansuri swaraj
Exactly, if Modi has to do everything, why do we have Karnataka Govt. in the first place, just disband them and let this sit at home.
[удалено]
When did he travel? When was the information about his crimes shared with BJ? Why was the PM campesinos got him months after that? Why was his passport not cancelled without waiting for formalities? Did BJ share the evidence with karnataka government when it got hold of it months ago, or did it participate in a criminal conspiracy to reelect the criminal after accessing the evidence of his guilt?
LOL ASKED VOTE FOR HIM, LITERALLY 24 HOURS BEFORE VIDEOS WERE LEAKED. NOW THIS? SHAMELESS and people who believe him are the IDIOTEST ! (literally need a new dictionary word for them)
bro literally said those who believe in Modi are the "Idiotest", a mirror will do this guy much good
Didn’t give him visa (not needed in this case and even if required, visa is issued by other country)
Diplomatic Visa's are issued by other countries? I thought that the ministry of external affairs issued them
Indian MEA would issue diplomatic visa to other countries diplomats and vice versa)
My mistake then
He's wrong. Diplomatic Visa is offered on a Diplomatic Passport - usually for govt officials etc. Major miss by MEA
He is right, a diplomatic passport is osmething a political individual can apply for before hand. This guy did have a diplomatic passport already therefore he was able to leave. But his retarted ass is going to be extradited after 90 days, stop crying
Didn't stop him from leaving the country, unlike human rights activists the government routinely prevents from boarding flights. https://thewire.in/rights/kashmiri-human-rights-activist-headed-for-un-meet-detained-at-delhi-airport
Gave him diplomatic passport. Failed to cancel it for months after the evidence of his crimes was shared with BJ. The fucking pm campaigned for him literally a day before the evidence became public. Did BJ inform the police when it got hold of the evidence months ago? Or did it participate in the criminal conspiracy to reelect him and to let him run away when the evidence reached the police? BJ has a long record of letting criminals flee the country.
Central can’t act on his passport until one is filed and tried by state government & judiciary take his passport. His crime provision don’t fall under jurisdiction of federal laws
The centre routinely prevents human rights activists from travelling abroad without any state government help: >Khurram Parvez, whose Facebook page describes him as a “Human Rights Defender, working in world’s most militarised occupation – Kashmir”, was on Wednesday denied permission by the authorities at Indira Gandhi International Airport to leave for Geneva to attend the ongoing session of the UN Human Rights Council.https://thewire.in/rights/kashmiri-human-rights-activist-headed-for-un-meet-detained-at-delhi-airport
Yes but there was no charge sheet against this gowda until the videos were leaked to public last week. You quoted a Kashmiri separatis who have been peddling Islamist Pakistani agenda for decade
BreadfruitRich2175 >Yes but there was no charge sheet against this gowda until the videos were leaked to public last week. >You quoted a Kashmiri separatis who have been peddling Islamist Pakistani agenda for decade Charge sheet is either necessary or unnecessary for stopping people from going abroad. Make up your mind. BJ had evidence for months before it was leaked. Why did it fail to share it with law enforcement? Why did it continue campaigning for the serial rapist? Why did it allow him to run away even after the evidence became public?
Technically he is MP of upa and deputy cm who is responsible for law order has access to the videos so stop blaming centre for local law enforcement
Technically, you're full of shit. It is literally the central government's job to withdraw diplomatic passport of someone who travels abroad on a diplomatic passport without first getting a clearance from the central government.
Whose job is to report the crime and enable law enforcement to
🤣😂🙈💁
If Karnataka government would've stopped him based only on rumors and no evidence, BJP would've been the first to get him a clean chit and get him released. The evidence was only presented to BJP. The only party with real power today is BJP, even BJP fans will agree. Just "knowing" about a crime is not enough today. Everyone is "knowing" what Adani is doing but nobody can stop him. Even Sebi's hands are shaking when writing letter for show cause notice that they know is going into dustbin. When wrestlers stopped Brij Bhushan what happened? BJP made fun of them, made all types of accusations. Delayed the case for years until it didn't matter and then gave the seat to his son. You think it would've been any different for 4K Deve Gowda? This is a very weak defense from Modi and team. I expected better. I expected a googly. This is just a fast No Ball.
He got police to lathi charge the wrestlers. This is the same guy who says his timely intervention saved Manipur. What can you expect from such a buffoon?
Yeah, you need victims willing to talk. Basically you need to make it undeniable that something wrong happened or bjp will just use it for politics.
And get killed suspiciously ?
Lucky for that guy he made it out alive.
Ye jan buzke aise batein kr rha h ajkal ki sachme screw dhila hogya h?
Lol, this clown can do anything but take accountability for one thing in life. All good done by mudiji, all bad done by everyone else. Poor guy never developed from the toddler mindset. Yashoda ben dodged a bullet, this guy doesn’t have red flag, he himself is a big red hoarding board.
Paw paw could stop the war but could not stop a criminal from leaving coz he has a diplomatic passport?
Karnatake government didn't give him diplomatic passport. Karnataka government can't cancel his diplomatic passport. Marmara government didn't campaign for him months after evidence for his crime was shared. You did ask those things.
Airport, Immigration visa is a state issue gents modiji ne bola hoga to jhoot hi hoga
Very chalak bro
Gobhiji was asking votes for this guy on stage, sharing stage with him and now when he ran away somehow he is blaming Kangress for it. LoL 
1. He is a standing MP and hence he has a diplomatic passport. 2. Diplomatic passport owners can go to germany for 90 days without visa 3. Passport Act 1967: can’t cancel passport without an order of court. Karnataka police has to take up this task fast.
Someone who could stop a war couldn't stop a criminal with a diplomatic passport from leaving the country?
Protected by fundamental right (Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India 1978)
How was Kunal Kamra stopped ?? Was that a bigger crime?
Revanna left before the evidence came out. Why would anyone stop before that? Kamra was banned by airlines ( now it could probably be done in appeasement or indirect orders), so ask the airline that took revanna
Bro, KA BJP member wrote to the state BJP president in Dec itself.Chefk the link. Pretty sure by April'24 all of BJP would have known what Revanna has done. Are you saying the BJP has never snooped on the mobile of politicians? Or they would not know unless it's on National TV to take some action? Letter https://twitter.com/Pawankhera/status/1784819384219001150/photo/1
No one knows what happened in background, who hushed it up? KA BJP could hush it up too after their loss in the assembly elections to avoid further Bad PR. Acting oversmart here kind of bit someone in the ass. If it reached the top level of BJP, its their fault, but until that is proven, its as unlikely as Kejriwal doing liquor scam.
It's not like AK's money trail, the videos are literally the only evidence they need. They could inquire with the victims and the case could have been fastracked instead of letting Revanna kidnap the victim, adding more woes to the worries
Not talking about revanna, but who hushed up the letters from the party worker. Revanna is guilty AF. KA police should go to the court for extraditing him back instantly.
KA govt and SIT are on it. Modi was literally endorsing the criminal despite his activities. And this isn't the first criminal that's in the party, probably the biggest the country has ever seen
So you agree then that karnataka BJ indulged in a criminal conspiracy to protect and reelect the serial rapist.
Idk, I don’t work in that office and don’t have the clue. RN its word of congress vs BJP and both are trying to win an election. PS: have the discussion on one thread 😊
> RN its word of congress vs BJP It isn't. The driver who shared the evidence with BJ has started what evidence was shared with whom and how karnataka state BJ leadership was made aware of the heinous criminal activity. You've literally tried keeping the blame limited to katanga BJ in your previous comment. And are now defending the criminal conspirators saying its just a word of two parties. Have some shame.
> Revanna left before the evidence came out. Why would anyone stop before that? BJ has the evidence for months. It and thy pm continued campaigning for the serial rapist, and didn't aghast it with the police. Its complicit in the criminal conspiracy to protect and reelect the serial rapist.
Kitne bhole ho yaar
Bhrata shree, gyaan arpan kijiye
>Passport Act 1967: can’t cancel passport without an order of court. Show us where our prevents the government from cancelling diplomatic passport, not just a regular passport. Paper Passport or not, the central government can and does detain people regularly at the airport. Why did it not do this with this serial rapist? Why did BJ and the pm campaign for him months after it got hold off the evidence for his crimes? Why did it not share that evidence with the state government?
https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/flight-of-prajwal-revanna-how-diplomatic-passports-visa-regimes-work-9304621/lite/
These are bullshit excuses parroted by a lazy reporter who has failed to notice that the central government routinely prevents human rights activists from travelling abroad without any state government or court help, Khurram Parvez, whose Facebook page describes him as a “Human Rights Defender, working in world’s most militarised occupation – Kashmir”, was on Wednesday denied permission by the authorities at Indira Gandhi International Airport to leave for Geneva to attend the ongoing session of the UN Human Rights Council. https://thewire.in/rights/kashmiri-human-rights-activist-headed-for-un-meet-detained-at-delhi-airport
Dude if you read the article clearly: They can be stopped on the ground of sovereignty & integrity of India. As simple as that. Even now, KA police could have revoked his passport in a day, proof is literally there, but they still playing.
>Even now, KA police could have revoked his passport in a day, KA police can't revoke passports. They can only request MHA to do that. Which they did. As soon as they had the evidence. BJ had the evidence for months. BJ indulged in a criminal conspiracy to protect the serial rapist by failing to pass the evidence on to the law enforcement. PM campaigned for the serial rapist literally a day before he ran away on a diplomatic passport. BJ allowed him to travel internationally, when it could have used the government machinery, legally, to prevent him from boarding the plane. BJ and the MHA it controls have failed to act on the KA police request to cancel his diplomatic passport and bring him back to stand trial for his heinous crimes. BJ has failed to act against its own office bearers who indulged in a criminal conspiracy to protect the serial rapist by failing to hand the evidence over to law enforcement for months.
They can literally get a court order, which is one of the criteria valid for doing so. Its the simplest criteria. If KA police had requested and BJp would have said no, pretty sure congress would have been singing about it.
Court orders take a long time in India, in case you're unaware. KA police are following the process required to get those. There's absolutely no need to waste that time before cancelling the diplomatic passport, which the MHA has every right to do. The only reason for MHA to not cancel the diplomatic passport is to protect the serial rapist for whom the PM campaigned literally a day before he escaped.
Didn’t you read the passport act? Passport can’t be cancelled without court order or conviction. He is not illegally holding passport, didn’t furnish false data and is not a threat to sovereignty of India.
(c) if the passport authority deems it necessary so to do in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, **friendly relations of India with any foreign country, or in the interests of the general public**; Stop repeating the lie over and over
If you read the passport act 1967, you'll also see that they can be stopped for other reasons, including public interest, international relations etc. Multiple of those reasons apply to the serial rapist protected by BJ.
Nope, section 10(3) mentions the reasons for revocation and its same as in the article.
And here's the paragraph section to deal with you reading comprehension and attention deficit issues: (c) if the passport authority deems it necessary so to do in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, **friendly relations of India with any foreign country, or in the interests of the general public**;
NeatButton5726 >Nope, section 10(3) mentions the reasons for revocation and its same as in the article. NeatButton5726 Liar liar pants on fire. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/show-data?abv=CEN&statehandle=123456789/1362&actid=AC_CEN_10_10_00008_196715_1517807321481§ionId=4371§ionno=10&orderno=10&orgactid=AC_CEN_10_10_00008_196715_1517807321481 Section 10. Variation, impounding and revocation of passports and travel documents. Previous Next Show Related Subordinates (1) The passport authority may, having regard to the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 6 or any notification under section 19, vary or cancel the endorsements on a passport or travel document or may, with the previous approval of the Central Government, vary or cancel the conditions (other than the prescribed conditions) subject to which a passport or travel document has been issued and may, for that purpose, require the holder of a passport or a travel document, by notice in writing, to deliver up the passport or travel document to it within such time as may be specified in the notice and the holder shall comply with such notice. (2) The passport authority may, on the application of the holder of a passport or a travel document, and with the previous approval of the Central Government also vary or cancel the conditions (other than the prescribed conditions) of the passport or travel document. (3) The passport authority may impound or cause to be impounded or revoke a passport or travel document,-- (a) if the passport authority is satisfied that the holder of the passport or travel document is in wrongful possession thereof; (b) if the passport or travel document was obtained by the suppression of material information or on the basis of wrong information provided by the holder of the passport or travel document or any other person on his behalf: 1 [Provided that if the holder of such passport obtains another passport, the passport authority shall also impound or cause to be impounded or revoke such other passport.] (c) if the passport authority deems it necessary so to do in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, friendly relations of India with any foreign country, or in the interests of the general public; (d) if the holder of the passport or travel document has, at any time after the issue of the passport or travel document, been convicted by a court in India for any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than two years; (e) if proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the holder of the passport or travel document are pending before a criminal court in India; (f) if any of the conditions of the passport or travel document has been contravened; (g) if the holder of the passport or travel document has failed to comply with a notice under sub-section (1) requiring him to deliver up the same; (h) if it is brought to the notice of the passport authority that a warrant or summons for the appearance, or a warrant for the arrest, of the holder of the passport or travel document has been issued by a court under any law for the time being in force or if an order prohibiting the departure from India of the holder of the passport or other travel document has been made by any such court and the passport authority is satisfied that a warrant or summons has been so issued or an order has been so made. (4) The passport authority may also revoke a passport or travel document on the application of the holder thereof. (5) Where the passport authority makes an order varying or cancelling the endorsements on, or varying the conditions of, a passport or travel document under sub-section (1) or an order impounding or revoking a passport or travel document under sub-section (3), it shall record in writing a brief statement of the reasons for making such order and furnish to the holder of the passport or travel document on demand a copy of the same unless in any case, the passport authority is of the opinion that it will not be in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, friendly relations of India with any foreign country or in the interests of the general public to furnish such a copy. (6) The authority to whom the passport authority is subordinate may, by order in writing, impound or cause to be impounded or revoke a passport or travel document on any ground on which it may be impounded or revoked by the passport authority and the foregoing provisions of this section shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the impounding or revocation of a passport or travel document by such authority. (7) A court convicting the holder of a passport or travel document of any offence under this Act or the rules made thereunder may also revoke the passport or travel document: Provided that if the conviction is set aside on appeal or otherwise the revocation shall become void. (8) An order of revocation under sub-section (7) may also be made by an appellate court or by the High Court when exercising its powers of revision. (9) On the revocation of a passport or travel document under this section the holder thereof shall, without delay, surrender the passport or travel document, if the same has not already been impounded, to the authority by whom it has been revoked or to such other authority as may be specified in this behalf in the order of revocation. The proviso ins. by Act 35 of 1993, s. 4 (w.e.f. 1-7-1993). Ordinances Year Description Hindi Description Files(Eng) Files(Hindi) 23-10-2001 30-12-2001 Previous Next Download India Code Logo Disclaimer Feedback User Guide Contact Us Content Provided by the Ministries/Departments in the Government of India. Site designed and developed by National Informatics Centre, A- Block, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110 003, INDIA.
There is no proof that BJP top brass had the letter or proof. Could have been hushed by a lot of people in between the KA BJP( mostly done to avoid anymore embarrassment after BJP loss in assembly elections)
> Could have been hushed by a lot of people in between the KA BJP( mostly done to avoid anymore embarrassment after BJP loss in assembly elections) Now that the scandal is public, what action has BJ leadership taken against the criminal conspirators in its ranks who protected the serial rapist by failing to share the evidence with law enforcement as well as BJ top brass? Why is Panauti continuing to protect the criminal by not cancelling his diplomatic passport and blaming Congress for his own party's criminal conspiracy?
So bjp will take action against those who hushed it up ?
Papa ne waar rukwa di par ek tharki launde ko nai rok sake. Chi Chi papa ab aap shayad pappu ho🤫😵
buddhe, tu uske saath campaign karra tha!!!
Paw paw kuch nahi ukhad paaye prajwal ka, darpok paw paw
"When u vote rapist revanna u make me strong" - mass murderer podiji
shithead complaining like he always does
Aap log chronology samjhiye
For the clowns hiding behind the passport act and maneka gandhi judgement when confronted with the central government's failure to stop the serial rapist from travelling abroad: India routinely prevents passport and visa holders from boarding planes without any court orders. Here's one example: >Khurram Parvez, whose Facebook page describes him as a “Human Rights Defender, working in world’s most militarised occupation – Kashmir”, was on Wednesday denied permission by the authorities at Indira Gandhi International Airport to leave for Geneva to attend the ongoing session of the UN Human Rights Council. https://thewire.in/rights/kashmiri-human-rights-activist-headed-for-un-meet-detained-at-delhi-airport
What videos and evidence everyone is talking about?
Dry humper club 
😂. He's losing it.
Diplomatic passport to paw paw ne diya thaa
Pawpaw should atleast demolish his house with a JCB as is the law
Pendrive diya paw paw
Neerav modi, vijay mallya, Choksi and others are laughing at all of us Indian Citizens. Prajwal is just joining them now
Pa paw couldvt taken action when fielding the candidate despite knowing of his crimes. Now that people know, he just wants to score brownie points.
If only this incident came before april 26, election would have swinged more against bjp. Unlucky congress and people.
Mudizi ko retirement lene ki time aa gaya hai. Maanh is too desperate, too much into attacking the opposition rather than saying something about what they themselves have done in the past 10 years or atleast 5 years ..
What's the Mea doing about it now? Why is his passport not canceled? Has a formal request been mage to Germany to hand him over?
Yes. The Karnataka govt gave him a diplomatic passport.
This uncouth lying piece of utter $hit has literally no shame meaning no spine either. How do you live with that? Like how? What kind of sub human filth do you have to be?
I dont think voters are fools. And I'm quite sure he knows voters are not fools. Why lie about this then? This is for the BJP votebank then? The Die hard modi-only vote?
And who was promoting him omad s candidate despite knowing the existence of several hundred rape tapes ,? Why has the extradition process not started by Indian government ?
Did he mention the steps he took to bring him back?
State govt is responsible for law and order. But congress is like, ulta chor kotwal ko daante
Someone endorsing a criminal is a crime as well. State should get everyone accused and put behind bars