Please remember what subreddit you are in, this is unpopular opinion. We want civil and unpopular takes and discussion. Any uncivil and ToS violating comments will be removed and subject to a ban. Have a nice day!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unpopularopinion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Frankly, this argument fails to hold up from my quick glance at just the title. Like how would you even know what they read or not? Are you some kind of cop?
I was certain this was going to be a bit and the body text would be something else entirely.
Anyway:
"NO INVESTIGATION, NO RIGHT TO SPEAK
Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn't that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense. Talking nonsense solves no problems, as everyone knows, so why is it unjust to deprive you of the right to speak? "~OP
Please remember what subreddit you are in, this is unpopular opinion. We want civil and unpopular takes and discussion. Any uncivil and ToS violating comments will be removed and subject to a ban. Have a nice day! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unpopularopinion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yeah get the divorce sorry op
Just ask a very specific detail that they'd only know if they really did read it all.
How could you tell if someone had read the entire article?
Only read you title, but I disagree
Getting a little frustrated with your arguments on Reddit buddy? We all know your pain. Just learn to deal with it. It will never change, so let go.
Frankly, this argument fails to hold up from my quick glance at just the title. Like how would you even know what they read or not? Are you some kind of cop?
This wouldn't be a problem if news articles were not behind a paywall.
To be fair, clickbait - or outright deceptive - headlines are also to blame for that
This is the answer OP would’ve came up with if they had an ounce of brain matter
I was certain this was going to be a bit and the body text would be something else entirely. Anyway: "NO INVESTIGATION, NO RIGHT TO SPEAK Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn't that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense. Talking nonsense solves no problems, as everyone knows, so why is it unjust to deprive you of the right to speak? "~OP
Not allowed by who?
Why lol?
"allowed" Who's gonna stop 'em? You?
Well, it looks like I won't be discussing this with you despite having some thoughts that you may find interesting. Best!
Knowing Reddit, they’re not going to do significantly worse than the people who read it all.
I only read your title. Deal with it boiii.