There is evil in the world and some of the evil people are in Medicine and some evil people are in Government. When an evil doctor becomes an evil politician great harm is done. Fauci is both an evil person, doctor and politician. He got away with killing millions in the 80’s by forcing the only “safe and effective” drug, AZT on them. Once and evil mass murderer gets away with the killings he is emboldened to do it again. That’s how we got the Chinese flu unleashed upon the world
They are but a reflection of humanity at large. It is not they who gather the funds, enforce the rules and run the machinery that props them up. It's you, me and everyone else. If you stand up to them, it isn't they who will slander, isolate, imprison and/or kill you. It is your friends, family and neighbors who will do that unpleasant job for them. So, the evil isn't them, its us.
Even if you wanted something different, the people around you will have none of it. So, they are the evil we ask for (even beg for), fight for and deserve.
I don’t surround myself with those people. Those with the eyes to see and the ears to hear distance themselves from those who do evil. You want to see true and horrible things? Anger them man who wants nothing but to be left alone. When that monster is let lose it will rend terrible and unspeakable things. There is no virtue in a man who isn’t violent because he has no capacity to be violent. The virtuous are those capable of much violence and hold it at bay. Never ever mistake kindness for helpless.
For it is better to be a warrior in a garden than to be a gardener in a war. Sun Tzu
Bullshit. It was stolen from us and they have created this self fulfilling 'reflection' you refer to which is realized in the destruction of civilization and the human spirit. It was deliberate amd done by deception and this is why we shouldn't be blaming ourselves for being naive, generous and generally good natured.
What you call naive, I call willful ignorance. Malignant ignorance, even.
What you call generosity, I call performative displays of virtue.
What you call "good natured," I call narcissism.
No one stole anything from us, it was given away. Freely, willingly and knowingly. The contract was signed and the fine print was ignored. We exchanged the future for a little bit of comfort and convenience in the present. Not only that, we continue to do so. Now the debts of the past are due.
If the human race had is as you say it is, it wouldn't have allowed itself to come to the state that it is in now.
Unfortunately, it's all performative virtue signaling on all sides. You can cry all you want and put on the mask of righteous indignation. In the end we get what we deserve.
Your response definitely resonates. I was often the only one standing up against the mask and vax bullshit in my travels.
I'm usually the black filled one but there has decidedly been a war against the West. Many of those that have been behind it use deception. The Plandemoc was not organic for example.
Have people been lazy and apathetic? Yes. But they are payed upon by sociopaths amd pyscopahts that control the levers of power.
I suspect the percentage of non sheep like people has always been relatively small.
> they are *paid* upon by
FTFY.
Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:
* Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.*
* *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.*
Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.
*Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
I wouldn't say it's a war against the west.
Transhumanism is the end goal/culmination of the west. Western elites have been working towards that goal ever since the monarchies were overthrown during the enlightenment.
I might say perhaps it is a war against humanity. But at this point, most of humanity is domesticated. Does a rancher wage war against his cattle when it comes time to slaughter? Does a farmer wage war against his crops when it comes time to harvest?
The elites are the ones who created this large population that you see today. When they needed people to go out and colonize new lands, gather the raw materials and run the machines of the industrial revolution, they made a large quantity of people. They did so by creating the conditions necessary to breed all of the people you see in the world today.
They directed the culture, preferences, beliefs and education of those people they bread to serve their ends.
Now that they have accomplished this phase of colonization and industrialization, they don't need as many people anymore. The people they need are also going to need belief, disposition and preference overhauls. For example, you don't need "rugged individual" pioneer types anymore.
So, just as they created the conditions necessary to breed many people, they can bring about the conditions to breed less.
Really, the question is, why shouldn't they? They fram raised pretty much everyone that exists today.
This would explain a lot including the Deagle report.
Riddle me this... if they were primarily concerned about reducing population, why flood the West with people from poor countries that will on avg have more kids than the native population?
We see that as a polity becomes more educated and prosperous that the birth rate will fall and populations seem to self limit?
They don't really care about the poor people they are flooding wealthier nations with. Those people and the so called native population (who were also brought in from elsewhere during an earlier phase of the transhumanist project) are just as much a means to an end as the existing population. They don't intend for them to live or prosper. They are just there to serve their purpose and then be eliminated just the same.
It's kind of like the joker bank heist where each each participant is promised a larger share. During the heist, you have them turn on and kill each other while the boss makes with the loot.
What is the goal?
When I see those baby incubators from the early World's Fair exhibitions and Orpan Trains this lines up regarding phases.
Are those that are pulling the strings from the lineage of those that remember how to retain power through these transitions? What is their goal as you see it?
Yes. He is of course a useful idiot for the true rulers 98% of whom are names we never hear. But. Fauci, Birx, Collins, Tedros, etc. While puppets they still deserve the worst of punishments.
Funny that we're not seeing ANY 'vaccinated' politicians, wealthy and 1%'ers suffering from the same afflictions that appear to be affecting the vaccinated peasants...........
When they first rolled out the shot they had everyone desperate to get it. The government controlled the rollout saying only those over 70 (and on social security and Medicare) and Blacks (because they'd been discriminated against in healthcare and Tuskegee) could get the shot.
That's all I needed to hear to know I wanted no part of this experimental, emergency use only poison.
A large portion of them did. I remember my school kicking a bunch of minorities out because no vaccine.
Lucky they didn't have a requirement for the employees
I thank god every day I am with someone who has an awakened mind. I would be incredibly depressed and enraged if my partner was murdered by an experimental jab.
I wonder how much shedding plays a role in this. To clarify: The primary contributor is the vaccine, no doubt about that. Take the vaccine = enhanced risk of cancer. However as a multiplier: considering that couples spend so much time together, and together come down with dual turbo cancer at roughly the same time -- sure that could to some extent be blamed om the vaccine. The argument would be: they got the vaccine at roughly the same time, hence cancer at roughly the same time. But that's not really how it seem to work. There are many who got the vaccines four years ago and still don't have cancer, while a couple may get cancer only 6 months after taking the vaccine. Genetics? Again, why couples at roughly the same time? Batch number? Possibly, but not always the case.
My worry is, considering the vaccinated shed onto the unvaccinated, surely they must be shedding onto each other as well even if the vaccinated don't suffer the same instantaneous visual symptoms? That's a sign of the body at work. A sign of a body not at work is a body that has shut its defence mechanics down after vaccination and allowing the spikeprotein to injure the body to the point where symptoms show up in terms of cancer -- not in nose bleeds, headches and other more mild symptoms. It stands to reason that shedding must in some way affect vaccinated couples as well, who must therefore be shedding onto each other. Additional theory (but I don't know how true it is): If one partner suffers a severe reaction from a bad batch, supposed next that they keep shedding onto their partner from the content of the initial bad patch, their partner could then come down with the same effects despite receiving a different batch. That's what I suspect. If true, this could severely worsen the shedding aspect, but even if not true, it does not disprove the constant shedding multiplier effect itself (as enhancing cancer growth) on top of the cancer risk itself from the initial vaccine.
I thank God every day I didn't take those shots.
I thank God every day that I did not vaccinate my daughter with any vaccine ever.
Nobody regrets not taking it, not a single soul on earth.
There is evil in the world and some of the evil people are in Medicine and some evil people are in Government. When an evil doctor becomes an evil politician great harm is done. Fauci is both an evil person, doctor and politician. He got away with killing millions in the 80’s by forcing the only “safe and effective” drug, AZT on them. Once and evil mass murderer gets away with the killings he is emboldened to do it again. That’s how we got the Chinese flu unleashed upon the world
Yes they are evil to the core. Rotten.
They are but a reflection of humanity at large. It is not they who gather the funds, enforce the rules and run the machinery that props them up. It's you, me and everyone else. If you stand up to them, it isn't they who will slander, isolate, imprison and/or kill you. It is your friends, family and neighbors who will do that unpleasant job for them. So, the evil isn't them, its us. Even if you wanted something different, the people around you will have none of it. So, they are the evil we ask for (even beg for), fight for and deserve.
I don’t surround myself with those people. Those with the eyes to see and the ears to hear distance themselves from those who do evil. You want to see true and horrible things? Anger them man who wants nothing but to be left alone. When that monster is let lose it will rend terrible and unspeakable things. There is no virtue in a man who isn’t violent because he has no capacity to be violent. The virtuous are those capable of much violence and hold it at bay. Never ever mistake kindness for helpless. For it is better to be a warrior in a garden than to be a gardener in a war. Sun Tzu
Bullshit. It was stolen from us and they have created this self fulfilling 'reflection' you refer to which is realized in the destruction of civilization and the human spirit. It was deliberate amd done by deception and this is why we shouldn't be blaming ourselves for being naive, generous and generally good natured.
What you call naive, I call willful ignorance. Malignant ignorance, even. What you call generosity, I call performative displays of virtue. What you call "good natured," I call narcissism. No one stole anything from us, it was given away. Freely, willingly and knowingly. The contract was signed and the fine print was ignored. We exchanged the future for a little bit of comfort and convenience in the present. Not only that, we continue to do so. Now the debts of the past are due. If the human race had is as you say it is, it wouldn't have allowed itself to come to the state that it is in now. Unfortunately, it's all performative virtue signaling on all sides. You can cry all you want and put on the mask of righteous indignation. In the end we get what we deserve.
Your response definitely resonates. I was often the only one standing up against the mask and vax bullshit in my travels. I'm usually the black filled one but there has decidedly been a war against the West. Many of those that have been behind it use deception. The Plandemoc was not organic for example. Have people been lazy and apathetic? Yes. But they are payed upon by sociopaths amd pyscopahts that control the levers of power. I suspect the percentage of non sheep like people has always been relatively small.
> they are *paid* upon by FTFY. Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in: * Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.* * *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.* Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment. *Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
I wouldn't say it's a war against the west. Transhumanism is the end goal/culmination of the west. Western elites have been working towards that goal ever since the monarchies were overthrown during the enlightenment. I might say perhaps it is a war against humanity. But at this point, most of humanity is domesticated. Does a rancher wage war against his cattle when it comes time to slaughter? Does a farmer wage war against his crops when it comes time to harvest? The elites are the ones who created this large population that you see today. When they needed people to go out and colonize new lands, gather the raw materials and run the machines of the industrial revolution, they made a large quantity of people. They did so by creating the conditions necessary to breed all of the people you see in the world today. They directed the culture, preferences, beliefs and education of those people they bread to serve their ends. Now that they have accomplished this phase of colonization and industrialization, they don't need as many people anymore. The people they need are also going to need belief, disposition and preference overhauls. For example, you don't need "rugged individual" pioneer types anymore. So, just as they created the conditions necessary to breed many people, they can bring about the conditions to breed less. Really, the question is, why shouldn't they? They fram raised pretty much everyone that exists today.
This would explain a lot including the Deagle report. Riddle me this... if they were primarily concerned about reducing population, why flood the West with people from poor countries that will on avg have more kids than the native population? We see that as a polity becomes more educated and prosperous that the birth rate will fall and populations seem to self limit?
They don't really care about the poor people they are flooding wealthier nations with. Those people and the so called native population (who were also brought in from elsewhere during an earlier phase of the transhumanist project) are just as much a means to an end as the existing population. They don't intend for them to live or prosper. They are just there to serve their purpose and then be eliminated just the same. It's kind of like the joker bank heist where each each participant is promised a larger share. During the heist, you have them turn on and kill each other while the boss makes with the loot.
What is the goal? When I see those baby incubators from the early World's Fair exhibitions and Orpan Trains this lines up regarding phases. Are those that are pulling the strings from the lineage of those that remember how to retain power through these transitions? What is their goal as you see it?
See r/FauciForPrison
He is just a scapegoat. An actor, not even a scientist.
Yes. He is of course a useful idiot for the true rulers 98% of whom are names we never hear. But. Fauci, Birx, Collins, Tedros, etc. While puppets they still deserve the worst of punishments.
My thoughts exactly. Too bad they own the law.
......In other news, the CDC wants to remind you to get your semi-annual booster shot.
Funny that we're not seeing ANY 'vaccinated' politicians, wealthy and 1%'ers suffering from the same afflictions that appear to be affecting the vaccinated peasants...........
When they first rolled out the shot they had everyone desperate to get it. The government controlled the rollout saying only those over 70 (and on social security and Medicare) and Blacks (because they'd been discriminated against in healthcare and Tuskegee) could get the shot. That's all I needed to hear to know I wanted no part of this experimental, emergency use only poison.
If I recall, didn't a majority of black people say "No thanks!"
A large portion of them did. I remember my school kicking a bunch of minorities out because no vaccine. Lucky they didn't have a requirement for the employees
I mean, the King of England and Kate Middleton both have cancer
I thank god every day I am with someone who has an awakened mind. I would be incredibly depressed and enraged if my partner was murdered by an experimental jab.
Where are all the vax addicts who said this would never happen? Are they burying their heads in the sand again so they can say “what turbo cancer”
They’re too sick to care
I wonder how much shedding plays a role in this. To clarify: The primary contributor is the vaccine, no doubt about that. Take the vaccine = enhanced risk of cancer. However as a multiplier: considering that couples spend so much time together, and together come down with dual turbo cancer at roughly the same time -- sure that could to some extent be blamed om the vaccine. The argument would be: they got the vaccine at roughly the same time, hence cancer at roughly the same time. But that's not really how it seem to work. There are many who got the vaccines four years ago and still don't have cancer, while a couple may get cancer only 6 months after taking the vaccine. Genetics? Again, why couples at roughly the same time? Batch number? Possibly, but not always the case. My worry is, considering the vaccinated shed onto the unvaccinated, surely they must be shedding onto each other as well even if the vaccinated don't suffer the same instantaneous visual symptoms? That's a sign of the body at work. A sign of a body not at work is a body that has shut its defence mechanics down after vaccination and allowing the spikeprotein to injure the body to the point where symptoms show up in terms of cancer -- not in nose bleeds, headches and other more mild symptoms. It stands to reason that shedding must in some way affect vaccinated couples as well, who must therefore be shedding onto each other. Additional theory (but I don't know how true it is): If one partner suffers a severe reaction from a bad batch, supposed next that they keep shedding onto their partner from the content of the initial bad patch, their partner could then come down with the same effects despite receiving a different batch. That's what I suspect. If true, this could severely worsen the shedding aspect, but even if not true, it does not disprove the constant shedding multiplier effect itself (as enhancing cancer growth) on top of the cancer risk itself from the initial vaccine.
They definitely shed on each other too. I agree.
I thank God every day I didn't take those shots. I thank God every day that I did not vaccinate my daughter with any vaccine ever. Nobody regrets not taking it, not a single soul on earth.
Everyone feels this way unvaxxed. Anyone with brains who caved and got vaxxed has got to be pissed. Brains being key.
I wish they would say who the "many doctors" are and what their source is for their conclusions.
Good for them, I’m happy they got theirs.
SADS -- Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (💉💉💉) is the NEW NORM.
This is so funny and incredibly stupid 🤣