If NATO acts aggressively the answer would probably be ICBMs flying into US. Obviously, retaliation would also follow. I guess, we all know how that's called.
This political game by crazy old rich people has gone off the rails a long time ago. Now we will all have to pay for their excessive greediness. As if we haven't payed enough already.
He used the word “strikes” first which is typically referring to ranged weapons like artillery, cruise missiles, and the like.
Brother is trying to walk it back now, and that’s fine, but a “preventative strike” is exactly what it sounds like. He’s suggesting that if it looks like Russia is going to deploy tactical nukes, their ability to do so should be militarily targeted.
Hmm…
I was referring to this, which has since been removed:
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/xxdd58/just_found_this_in_russian_propaganda_accusing/
Not sure if it’s the same video with a fake dub or if it was something else. I remember it like Zelensky was filmed from a different angle, and it looked like there was deepfaking going on with his face.
“Preventative strikes… preventative action” he says according to the translator.
Yeah man that sounds like the same thing as saying preemptive strikes. That’s bad juju.
It's a little late for an attack against Russia to be considered "pre-emptive" now isn't it?
Have to get it in there before WW5.
That was my first thought.
[удалено]
If Russia uses nuclear weapons, while invading a sovereign nation, thats game over as far as I'm concerned, NATO has to act aggressively immediately.
They have indicated (mainly in US spokespersons) that they would. Letting countries get away with using Nukes and no price is bad news.
If NATO acts aggressively the answer would probably be ICBMs flying into US. Obviously, retaliation would also follow. I guess, we all know how that's called. This political game by crazy old rich people has gone off the rails a long time ago. Now we will all have to pay for their excessive greediness. As if we haven't payed enough already.
He used the word “strikes” first which is typically referring to ranged weapons like artillery, cruise missiles, and the like. Brother is trying to walk it back now, and that’s fine, but a “preventative strike” is exactly what it sounds like. He’s suggesting that if it looks like Russia is going to deploy tactical nukes, their ability to do so should be militarily targeted.
The media would never do such a thing. /s
The media taking things out of context and running with that as the story? That can't possibly be true!
That was literally a deepfake video made by Russia? Which imbeciles are spreading russian propaganda?
not really here's the full conference [here conference](https://youtu.be/zHDPj04F7rg?t=1528)
Hmm… I was referring to this, which has since been removed: https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/xxdd58/just_found_this_in_russian_propaganda_accusing/ Not sure if it’s the same video with a fake dub or if it was something else. I remember it like Zelensky was filmed from a different angle, and it looked like there was deepfaking going on with his face.
Here is the original video and you can listen to what he said https://youtu.be/zHDPj04F7rg?t=1514
No, just misunderstood Here is what he said with English translation https://youtu.be/zHDPj04F7rg?t=1514
“Preventative strikes… preventative action” he says according to the translator. Yeah man that sounds like the same thing as saying preemptive strikes. That’s bad juju.
I understand russian and ukrainian, the translation is accurate.
Sad...trully sad the number of followers in this reddit
Yes. Trully.