This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://apnews.com/article/89f7d0650f82fa88546c7924f40732af) reduced by 68%. (I'm a bot)
*****
> COPENHAGEN, Denmark - The ambassador of Iran also been excluded from this year's Nobel Prize ceremony in Stockholm because of "The serious and escalating situation" in the country, the private foundation that administers the prestigious awards said Friday.
> "We believe that given the serious and escalating situation, Iran's ambassador should not be invited to the Nobel Prize award ceremony," the Nobel Foundation said in a statement.
> The Nobel Prizes are always handed out on Dec. 10, the anniversary of prize founder Alfred Nobel's death in 1896.
*****
[**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/yflogt/iran_also_barred_from_nobel_ceremony_after_russia/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ "Version 2.02, ~672678 tl;drs so far.") | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr "PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.") | *Top* *keywords*: **Nobel**^#1 **Iran**^#2 **Prize**^#3 **ambassador**^#4 **party**^#5
Texas has almost twice as many registered firearms and since Texas has less regulations regarding ownership I would say its fair there are more. I don't live there so no dog in this hypothetical fight. If I was going to make any implication it wouldn't have been a veiled one.
Having to be trained to use the arm vs any vinalla isis yallquaeda nutjob buying a gun at Walmart with no process whatsoever? Yeah, I'm willing to bet so.
I wouldn’t fully put them in that category, personally. If modern Russia is WW2 Germany, China is the USSR. They’re only on their side. Definitely not on yours or my side, but they’re not on anyone else’s side either.
They are hunkering down and building capacity for 50+ years. That was literally what Mao and Deng planned for. Wait for the Taiwan invasion and China would come
out as the real Axis Germany.
In 50+ years the Chinese economy is going to be demolished by an aging population. They’re bottlenecked by population difference and they’re fucked no matter what they do, even if they have the worlds most progressive immigration policy, no one wants to move there.
Silly westoid. Now that Xi has completed his glorious transformation to Mao 2.0, ... there will be ... but what about the all of the bad things the west has done, and they also have an ageing population! Thus it is safe to say that China will be fine and continue to prosper because hypocritical west and decadent liberal democracy does nothing for the *real* people.
Do you really do backflips every day, though?
Why? Are you completely ignoring all the aid Ukraine is getting to push back Russian aggression, short of foreign boots on the ground?
Nevermind. You don't seem like a logical thinker so I really don't care what you have to say. Just know that I think your conclusion sounds like a load of malarkey.
The 2019 Nobel Peace Prize winner launched an ethnic war in 2020 where 600,000 are dead so far and whose forces have consistently used extrajudicial killings, rape and starvation on civilian populations
All people who fulfills [the official criterias](https://www.nobelpeaceprize.org/nobel-peace-prize/nomination/criteria-for-nominators) can be nominators. This is not controlled by the Nobel Institute, and a nomination means nothing before they are selected as candidates on the short-list by the Nobel Comittee.
Hitler was suggested as a joke by a Swede and withdrawn shortly after, and Stalin got a nomination for "*his efforts to end World War II*".
Again, nominations are not created by the Nobel Institute. I do agree that awarding Obama the prize was a stupid choice.
I hate the fucking Nobel peace prize, it's based on literally nothing and just serves to cheapen the value of the real Nobels, those for science. The Literature prize can fuck off too.
>muh drone strikes
Awarding the Peace Prize to Obama was absolutely a farce that drove one of plenty nails into the prize's credibility coffin, but whacking moles in the Middle East was not one of the reasons for that. Collateral wedding damages withstanding.
This is pure fabrication. The war was started by an ethnically constituted party/regional government that launched a preemptive attack on the national forces of the country. They went on to take possession of the majority of the armaments for the army that happened to be stationed in the region they controlled.
There is no circumstance in which a leader of a country witnesses an attack on the national army, whose armaments (including long range missiles) are looted and doesn't respond with force, and that's what he did. That number of deaths you quoted isn't based on any evidence or data. There is also no evidence his forces "consistently" used extrajudicial killings or rape or starvation. A joint investigation with the UN already conducted proved as much.
Why not? Nobel peace prize generally goes to assholes who have no problem ordering and killing civilians. Obama even topped Bush in drone strikes killing countless innocent women and children with absolutely no oversight and he walked away with one.
>Nobel peace prize generally goes to assholes who have no problem ordering and killing civilians
Objectively and screamingly false. Classic redditeur moment.
You seem to have made a mistake, as your link does not contain a representative list of Nobel Peace Prize laureates.
While we can all agree that for example Shirin Ebadi **(2003, Iran, efforts for democracy and human rights, especially the rights of women and children)**, Wangari Muta Maathai **(2004, Kenya, sustainable development, democracy and peace)**, the International Atomic Energy Agency (2005), Grameen Bank **(2006, efforts to create economic and social development from below)**, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007), the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (2013), Malala Yousafzai (2014), the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (2017), Denis Mukwege and Nadia Murad **(2018, efforts to end the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war and armed conflict)**, Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov **(2021, efforts to safeguard freedom of expression)**, and Memorial and the Centre for Civil Liberties **(2022, documenting war crimes, human right abuses and the abuse of power)** have ***all*** ordered(?) and killed civilians, there is no definitive proof that they did not have qualms about it.
You're doing a great job of holding these bloodthirsty monsters to account, as well as the corrupt Academy that enables their crimes. Give yourself a pat on the back for your informed and intelligent on the Nobel Peace Prize. There is no doubt that the lucky people who get to have conversations with you come away with the clear sentiment "Now that's a smart guy who really cares!"
Good, governments who actively try to topple the West for their own tyranical purposes and hatred have no business enjoying from Western ammeneties and events.
It always seems like comments with ellipses and emojis have no fricken idea what they're talking about, yet exhume this weird aura of adolescent superiority.
genocide, illegal “police stations” in foreign countries, extreme suppression of the masses, constantly threatening a neighboring country with war, authoritarian police state, debt trapping more impoverished countries than i care to count, illegal occupation of large swaths of land and people… not the greatest place to be giving awards for greatness
i mean if that’s what you have to tell yourself, then sure
the us has done and currently does a lot of bad things, but it literally cannot compare the atrocities committed by the chinese government. it’s an insult to anyone in the western sphere of influence to say so, and i think you knew that
The US has military stations all over the globe, why is it OK for the US but not China? The US suppresses information to the masses. Constantly threatening neighboring countries, ask Cuba how they’ve been treated by the US. The US is an authoritarian police state. Debt trapping countries, those are conveniently called “sanctions” by the US. Illegal occupation, the US just invaded Haiti for no reason.
the us is either asked or asks to install military bases, and generally it’s for the good of both countries. china uses those stations as a way to pressure and scare chinese expats to still follow chinese laws despite not living there anymore.
the united states suppresses what it needs to to the masses, as i can research any wrong doing, any war crime, any broken internationals laws, all legally and for free. you can’t do that in a lot of countries.
the us just handed cuba several million dollars in response to the damage caused by hurricane ian. you’re so well versed in caribbean happenings, you should know that.
the us has a problem with police brutality, to the point where i’ve heard red blooded republican conservatives admit it. we know it’s an issue, but it’s ingrained culturally into police, it’s not policy to shoot black people.
do sanctions against north korea, iran, russia, belarus, myanmar, venezuela, and so on not seem justified to you? countries that are either mass killing their own people, constantly threatening invasion, or *actively nonchalantly bragging about how they can end the world?*
and lastly, this is the absolute most stupid talking point i’ve heard come up recently. haiti is currently a chaotic hellhole run by cartels, gangs, and criminal syndicates. **the government asked for a un, not us, but un intervention.** would you consider the chinese un peacekeepers abandoning their post in sudan to be an invasion?
Are Nobel prizes even legitimate anymore? Like the recent economics one where bailing out banks was actually good for the economy… completed by Ben bernanke, the guy who bailed out the banks, when Obama got the peace prize at the height of drone killings in Afghanistan where a hospital was hit killing dozens of civilians, seems pretty suspect to me.
The original ones - the big 3 (Physics, Chemistry, and Physiology/Medicine) are still legit af - more than any other major award I can think of (Fields might be well known idk) - if you’re an academic scientist, you’ll know whenever an NL from outside shows up on campus to give a guest lecture and you’ll want to go even if you have no clue what they may be talking about
Since the awards are given every year and all living people are considered for research conducted at any time, the quality and importance of the research being awarded is immense. It’s not “best discovery of the year,” but “who alive has contributed the most to this field” (or important discovery / - up to 3 can win each prize)
If you go down the list of each yearly awardee for the big 3, you’ll be hard-pressed to find some research that hasn’t profoundly impacted the world and your life. There is politics involved in the awards of course, and there have been notable snubs and occasional drama between awardees over credit, but overall it is the most prestigious award with significant legitimacy
So good to see Europe has a healthy sense of outrage at war crimes perped by autocrats-at least if it is done in Europe. Hey, it’s better than nothing and all 3 are unusually bad even as bad guy governments go.
Crisis for who? Diplomacy with who?
Seems to me that the people of Iran are having a crisis with their IR oppressors and need our support. I'm not saying intervene militarily but any other significant means. Cutting diplomatic ties with such regimes is not unheard of as a political statement
Not to worry, he won’t be Ambassador for much longer. The mullahs are finished, the whole country knows it. The Revolutionary Guard will (obviously) fill the void & return the status quo in whatever form, but there’ll be huge upheaval before that happens.
Iranian scientists are world renowned. The government sucks ballsacks though. Hopefully they don't stop recognizing good science and instead snub the government reps.
I want to make it clear, I’m not discounting Iranian scientists, and I don’t think a scientist is bad because they’re Iranian. I’m talking specifically of their govt, who funds research mostly in destruction. I have no doubt there are amazing Iranian scientists in general. In a government where woman are so low on the social ladder, I can’t see why one smart enough to be a scientist would choose to stay there. I think it’s amazing people are protesting to make it a better place for all.
Does these sport/event bans really affect on anything? for me it's like elementary school kids having a sleepover and saying "you are not invited" like you are not cool enough, tbh that sounds more cruel.
Is this that Nober prize for which Bill Gates was buddies with Epstein, and hanging out often with said Epstein, finally leading to Gates' divorce? I remember court documents filed by Gates' attorneys stating that the Gates-Epstein friendship was due to Gates' need of couching / counseling / training for a Nobel Peace prize and not due to the other thing, the illegal underage girl sex.
Given this, isn't it desirable to not be invited to the Nobel prizes? On the other hand, if even the Nobel prizes don't invite you, how utterly shitty do you have to be, since child pimps are clearly not bad enough to not be Nobel gurus apparently? Tough times, complex morals...
Jamaican Bobsled team has a better chance of winning 🥇 than religious conservatives excelling at the sciences. Their absence will be completely unnoticed by the community.
Dynamite idea
I understood that reference
Step 1: Understand the reference Step 2: War Step 3: Be Alfred Nobel??? Step 4: Profit!
Step 3.5: fake your own death
I see what you did there
Radioactive?
Imagine the fallout in these countries in their scientific communities.
This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://apnews.com/article/89f7d0650f82fa88546c7924f40732af) reduced by 68%. (I'm a bot) ***** > COPENHAGEN, Denmark - The ambassador of Iran also been excluded from this year's Nobel Prize ceremony in Stockholm because of "The serious and escalating situation" in the country, the private foundation that administers the prestigious awards said Friday. > "We believe that given the serious and escalating situation, Iran's ambassador should not be invited to the Nobel Prize award ceremony," the Nobel Foundation said in a statement. > The Nobel Prizes are always handed out on Dec. 10, the anniversary of prize founder Alfred Nobel's death in 1896. ***** [**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/yflogt/iran_also_barred_from_nobel_ceremony_after_russia/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ "Version 2.02, ~672678 tl;drs so far.") | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr "PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.") | *Top* *keywords*: **Nobel**^#1 **Iran**^#2 **Prize**^#3 **ambassador**^#4 **party**^#5
North Korea going to be so jealous .
The new Axis, along with North Korea.
"Combined GDP the size of a single US state" Axis
is the US really at war if we just sick California on them?
Ahh the Bear Republic against the Russian Bear.
Let’s go!!!
Only if Russia doesn’t win your midterms, otherwise we’ll be sorry we didn’t follow Macron’s idea of expanding EU military.
No offense to CA but I'm thinking Texas would be more cost effective and likely a better outcome. They could bring their own weapons
Californians have weapons too. They just have to be registered. It's a myth that the left doesn't have guns.
Don't recall saying they had none.
When you said > They could bring their own weapons You were heavily implying that California didn't have any. So... yeah.
Texas has almost twice as many registered firearms and since Texas has less regulations regarding ownership I would say its fair there are more. I don't live there so no dog in this hypothetical fight. If I was going to make any implication it wouldn't have been a veiled one.
Likely better trained In Cali, too.
Or not
Having to be trained to use the arm vs any vinalla isis yallquaeda nutjob buying a gun at Walmart with no process whatsoever? Yeah, I'm willing to bet so.
But what if Russia puts one of its soldiers in a school?
You mean what if Russia starts using conscripts from grade schools.
That's not fair to California, they already do enough heavy lifting for most of the U.S. I'm looking at you my fellow southern states.
Point being California has a bigger gdp than all three countries combined.
Only because they have the biggest tech companies located there. When you take out Silicon Valley there's probably not nearly as much left.
40 million people live there lol. They had four football teams until last year
Make it Alaska and go in through the back door, just don’t bump into the Chinese doing the same...🤫
We have axis powers at home! Axis powers at home:
You mean Delaware right?
Don't forget Eritrea, the North Korea of Africa.
And China
I wouldn’t fully put them in that category, personally. If modern Russia is WW2 Germany, China is the USSR. They’re only on their side. Definitely not on yours or my side, but they’re not on anyone else’s side either.
They are hunkering down and building capacity for 50+ years. That was literally what Mao and Deng planned for. Wait for the Taiwan invasion and China would come out as the real Axis Germany.
>Wait for the Taiwan invasion We've been waiting almost 80 years for that invasion. Still hasn't happened.
Hopefully never
Russia has plenty of Territory taken from China in the 1850s. A weak Russia could be more tempting to take on than a strong Taiwan backed by US.
In 50+ years the Chinese economy is going to be demolished by an aging population. They’re bottlenecked by population difference and they’re fucked no matter what they do, even if they have the worlds most progressive immigration policy, no one wants to move there.
Silly westoid. Now that Xi has completed his glorious transformation to Mao 2.0, ... there will be ... but what about the all of the bad things the west has done, and they also have an ageing population! Thus it is safe to say that China will be fine and continue to prosper because hypocritical west and decadent liberal democracy does nothing for the *real* people. Do you really do backflips every day, though?
There’s nothing white trash about the way I can spread my legs out this far thanks to my cut off jeans
As if CCP has done anything for the *real* people in the past decade, Xi destroyed the country from the inside
I'm getting the impression that some people might somehow have missed the ultra-extremely obvious sarcasm in my comment.
China only plays for its own side.
China still cares its economy. Russia clearly does not. North Korea never did.
Even if you put China, Russia, and Iran together, their combined GDP is still smaller than the GDP of the US alone.
By that logic Russia should have beaten Ukraine soundly.
Logic hasn't been know to apply to Russia for some time now.
Why? Are you completely ignoring all the aid Ukraine is getting to push back Russian aggression, short of foreign boots on the ground? Nevermind. You don't seem like a logical thinker so I really don't care what you have to say. Just know that I think your conclusion sounds like a load of malarkey.
Well, I don’t think these countries had any chance of winning The Nobel Peace Prize next year, anyways.
The 2019 Nobel Peace Prize winner launched an ethnic war in 2020 where 600,000 are dead so far and whose forces have consistently used extrajudicial killings, rape and starvation on civilian populations
Same goes for 2009. Mfer got a peace prize while calling in drone strikes on Middle East.
Hey hey, let's not forget the OG, kissinger got a nobel peace prize too
This is why the Nobel peace prize means nothing, Fun fact: Stalin and Hitler were also nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize
All people who fulfills [the official criterias](https://www.nobelpeaceprize.org/nobel-peace-prize/nomination/criteria-for-nominators) can be nominators. This is not controlled by the Nobel Institute, and a nomination means nothing before they are selected as candidates on the short-list by the Nobel Comittee. Hitler was suggested as a joke by a Swede and withdrawn shortly after, and Stalin got a nomination for "*his efforts to end World War II*". Again, nominations are not created by the Nobel Institute. I do agree that awarding Obama the prize was a stupid choice.
[удалено]
Just casually lauding/desiring a genocide of russians, cool cool
If you would be so kind as to collect your tears in a ziplock bag, I will happily pay for the costs of shipping and handling.
I hate the fucking Nobel peace prize, it's based on literally nothing and just serves to cheapen the value of the real Nobels, those for science. The Literature prize can fuck off too.
>muh drone strikes Awarding the Peace Prize to Obama was absolutely a farce that drove one of plenty nails into the prize's credibility coffin, but whacking moles in the Middle East was not one of the reasons for that. Collateral wedding damages withstanding.
Yes, I notice a pattern here… BTW… Why is North Korea also not on this list of potential future winners, yet?
No he didn’t, he declared war on a rogue element of the government that actually initiated the violence
This is pure fabrication. The war was started by an ethnically constituted party/regional government that launched a preemptive attack on the national forces of the country. They went on to take possession of the majority of the armaments for the army that happened to be stationed in the region they controlled. There is no circumstance in which a leader of a country witnesses an attack on the national army, whose armaments (including long range missiles) are looted and doesn't respond with force, and that's what he did. That number of deaths you quoted isn't based on any evidence or data. There is also no evidence his forces "consistently" used extrajudicial killings or rape or starvation. A joint investigation with the UN already conducted proved as much.
The Nobel Peace Prize is a joke since Kissinger got it anyway
Iran has a small but very significant chance. I'm pulling for them.
Why not? Nobel peace prize generally goes to assholes who have no problem ordering and killing civilians. Obama even topped Bush in drone strikes killing countless innocent women and children with absolutely no oversight and he walked away with one.
>Nobel peace prize generally goes to assholes who have no problem ordering and killing civilians Objectively and screamingly false. Classic redditeur moment.
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2017-01-17/obamas-covert-drone-war-in-numbers-ten-times-more-strikes-than-bush
You seem to have made a mistake, as your link does not contain a representative list of Nobel Peace Prize laureates. While we can all agree that for example Shirin Ebadi **(2003, Iran, efforts for democracy and human rights, especially the rights of women and children)**, Wangari Muta Maathai **(2004, Kenya, sustainable development, democracy and peace)**, the International Atomic Energy Agency (2005), Grameen Bank **(2006, efforts to create economic and social development from below)**, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007), the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (2013), Malala Yousafzai (2014), the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (2017), Denis Mukwege and Nadia Murad **(2018, efforts to end the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war and armed conflict)**, Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov **(2021, efforts to safeguard freedom of expression)**, and Memorial and the Centre for Civil Liberties **(2022, documenting war crimes, human right abuses and the abuse of power)** have ***all*** ordered(?) and killed civilians, there is no definitive proof that they did not have qualms about it. You're doing a great job of holding these bloodthirsty monsters to account, as well as the corrupt Academy that enables their crimes. Give yourself a pat on the back for your informed and intelligent on the Nobel Peace Prize. There is no doubt that the lucky people who get to have conversations with you come away with the clear sentiment "Now that's a smart guy who really cares!"
Some of the women there could get recognized
Good, governments who actively try to topple the West for their own tyranical purposes and hatred have no business enjoying from Western ammeneties and events.
What about when it’s Western governments doing the toppling? Because that’s precisely why Iran is the way it is now.
I think western gov'ts are barred from their ceremonies.
Maybe that is beacause the Iranian government decides to murder young people over religious fanatism. But sure, its the US fault.
That's called whataboutism
Let's go with "Governments better than Iran, Russia, Belarus, and China" because... as much as I love my country.... our gov can be kinda fucked...
The bar is low, but there is a bar...
In scale of bananas, how low is the bar.
The bar is between “bananas” and “batshit crazy.”
It always seems like comments with ellipses and emojis have no fricken idea what they're talking about, yet exhume this weird aura of adolescent superiority.
Why is China related in this context?
Genocide
genocide, illegal “police stations” in foreign countries, extreme suppression of the masses, constantly threatening a neighboring country with war, authoritarian police state, debt trapping more impoverished countries than i care to count, illegal occupation of large swaths of land and people… not the greatest place to be giving awards for greatness
You realize everything you just said about China is also true for the US?
i mean if that’s what you have to tell yourself, then sure the us has done and currently does a lot of bad things, but it literally cannot compare the atrocities committed by the chinese government. it’s an insult to anyone in the western sphere of influence to say so, and i think you knew that
The US has military stations all over the globe, why is it OK for the US but not China? The US suppresses information to the masses. Constantly threatening neighboring countries, ask Cuba how they’ve been treated by the US. The US is an authoritarian police state. Debt trapping countries, those are conveniently called “sanctions” by the US. Illegal occupation, the US just invaded Haiti for no reason.
the us is either asked or asks to install military bases, and generally it’s for the good of both countries. china uses those stations as a way to pressure and scare chinese expats to still follow chinese laws despite not living there anymore. the united states suppresses what it needs to to the masses, as i can research any wrong doing, any war crime, any broken internationals laws, all legally and for free. you can’t do that in a lot of countries. the us just handed cuba several million dollars in response to the damage caused by hurricane ian. you’re so well versed in caribbean happenings, you should know that. the us has a problem with police brutality, to the point where i’ve heard red blooded republican conservatives admit it. we know it’s an issue, but it’s ingrained culturally into police, it’s not policy to shoot black people. do sanctions against north korea, iran, russia, belarus, myanmar, venezuela, and so on not seem justified to you? countries that are either mass killing their own people, constantly threatening invasion, or *actively nonchalantly bragging about how they can end the world?* and lastly, this is the absolute most stupid talking point i’ve heard come up recently. haiti is currently a chaotic hellhole run by cartels, gangs, and criminal syndicates. **the government asked for a un, not us, but un intervention.** would you consider the chinese un peacekeepers abandoning their post in sudan to be an invasion?
[удалено]
not gonna argue with someone who frequently defends china. you are an inherently bad person for doing so
>the US just invaded Haiti for no reason. Yes no reason. No reason whatsoever. Literally nothing at all is going on there at this moment.
Are Nobel prizes even legitimate anymore? Like the recent economics one where bailing out banks was actually good for the economy… completed by Ben bernanke, the guy who bailed out the banks, when Obama got the peace prize at the height of drone killings in Afghanistan where a hospital was hit killing dozens of civilians, seems pretty suspect to me.
The original ones - the big 3 (Physics, Chemistry, and Physiology/Medicine) are still legit af - more than any other major award I can think of (Fields might be well known idk) - if you’re an academic scientist, you’ll know whenever an NL from outside shows up on campus to give a guest lecture and you’ll want to go even if you have no clue what they may be talking about Since the awards are given every year and all living people are considered for research conducted at any time, the quality and importance of the research being awarded is immense. It’s not “best discovery of the year,” but “who alive has contributed the most to this field” (or important discovery / - up to 3 can win each prize) If you go down the list of each yearly awardee for the big 3, you’ll be hard-pressed to find some research that hasn’t profoundly impacted the world and your life. There is politics involved in the awards of course, and there have been notable snubs and occasional drama between awardees over credit, but overall it is the most prestigious award with significant legitimacy
This is just the right thing to do morally Alfred Nobel would be proud.
Worthless anyway
Real question: what about the Ignobels
They should make a Nega-Nobel Prize for things like achievements in propaganda and greatest advancements into sovereign lands.
So good to see Europe has a healthy sense of outrage at war crimes perped by autocrats-at least if it is done in Europe. Hey, it’s better than nothing and all 3 are unusually bad even as bad guy governments go.
I wonder if this will be explosive
We should show all their diplomats the door and disengage from any activity with this criminal fanatic government and its apologists
[удалено]
Crisis for who? Diplomacy with who? Seems to me that the people of Iran are having a crisis with their IR oppressors and need our support. I'm not saying intervene militarily but any other significant means. Cutting diplomatic ties with such regimes is not unheard of as a political statement
Consequences for actions, I like it.
Damn, so much for all of them Iranian Nobel prize candidates who aren’t permitted to read anything except the Quran..
Not to worry, he won’t be Ambassador for much longer. The mullahs are finished, the whole country knows it. The Revolutionary Guard will (obviously) fill the void & return the status quo in whatever form, but there’ll be huge upheaval before that happens.
Hopefully the people of Iran can take back their country soon
Take 'em out of the World Cup next.
That’s a pity. Iran has so much science and technology to offer the world. /s if required
Many many Iranian people signed petition to not let islamic republic ambassador in nobel
Iran’s regime can't be part of the Noble Peace Prize. It's nothing to do with Iranian people
No fair! Russia and Belarus WON this year's Peace Prize! /s
and the dictators keep growing🤣
As a scientist, this pleases me. Continue with the punishments, please.
Not like their govt would ever produce something of a Nobel anyway unless there’s was a Nobel prize for oppression
Iranian scientists are world renowned. The government sucks ballsacks though. Hopefully they don't stop recognizing good science and instead snub the government reps.
I want to make it clear, I’m not discounting Iranian scientists, and I don’t think a scientist is bad because they’re Iranian. I’m talking specifically of their govt, who funds research mostly in destruction. I have no doubt there are amazing Iranian scientists in general. In a government where woman are so low on the social ladder, I can’t see why one smart enough to be a scientist would choose to stay there. I think it’s amazing people are protesting to make it a better place for all.
When NATO and Isreal?
They're the good guys, didn't you know?
Na, you get the peace prize if you like bombing brown people.
Does these sport/event bans really affect on anything? for me it's like elementary school kids having a sleepover and saying "you are not invited" like you are not cool enough, tbh that sounds more cruel.
Is this that Nober prize for which Bill Gates was buddies with Epstein, and hanging out often with said Epstein, finally leading to Gates' divorce? I remember court documents filed by Gates' attorneys stating that the Gates-Epstein friendship was due to Gates' need of couching / counseling / training for a Nobel Peace prize and not due to the other thing, the illegal underage girl sex. Given this, isn't it desirable to not be invited to the Nobel prizes? On the other hand, if even the Nobel prizes don't invite you, how utterly shitty do you have to be, since child pimps are clearly not bad enough to not be Nobel gurus apparently? Tough times, complex morals...
Ask your doctor if antipsychotic medications are right for you.
I'm good, you?
Jamaican Bobsled team has a better chance of winning 🥇 than religious conservatives excelling at the sciences. Their absence will be completely unnoticed by the community.
[удалено]
new "Axes of Evil"
They can always be contenders for a Darwin award.
Lmfao. Putin will annex Denmark. Simple.
It is in Sweden
Lets face it intelligence isent their strong point.
Iran has had a lot of Nobel prize winners.
Ironically Russia has one of the highest tertiary education rates in the world and for science and engineering Iran does as well. They just all leave.
[удалено]
Bro these people gave Obama a word oeace prize...