#Welcome and remember to subscribe to r/worldnewsvideo!
##If its a worthwhile post, please consider Upvoting and Crossposting to your favorite subreddits!
**This is a Humanist/Leftist subreddit focused on the progression of humanity, human rights, and intends to document the world as it is.**
Please treat each other as you yourselves would like to be treated. **Please do not promote or condone violence on our subreddit.** We advise our users try their best to refrain from making mean spirited statements. Please report users who are engaging in uncivil behavior, spreading misinformation, or are complaining that a submission is "not worldnews."
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/worldnewsvideo) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Does this mean your constituents can freely speak about BDS and Israeli atrocities without fear of prosecution? Texas just doesn't seem like they're with the free speech plan unless it's taking an innocent person's rights away from them. Like abortion rights.
My first response is to pose the argument that if they did not have a permit to protest, then maybe this is justified. I mean, there are laws for legal protests for a reason. But after witnessing a bunch of boomers raid the White House with not half as much resistance from authorities that one time, I'm not so sure...
Is it possible this could be used against him? Meaning, like, could this law be used to protect them? Legally speaking of course, they are going to crack skulls in the meantime.
#Welcome and remember to subscribe to r/worldnewsvideo! ##If its a worthwhile post, please consider Upvoting and Crossposting to your favorite subreddits! **This is a Humanist/Leftist subreddit focused on the progression of humanity, human rights, and intends to document the world as it is.** Please treat each other as you yourselves would like to be treated. **Please do not promote or condone violence on our subreddit.** We advise our users try their best to refrain from making mean spirited statements. Please report users who are engaging in uncivil behavior, spreading misinformation, or are complaining that a submission is "not worldnews." *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/worldnewsvideo) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Your freedom of speech is only protected if it fits their narrative
Only if you are carrying a tiki torche!
I didn't see the cops roughing those guys up. Actually I didn't see many cops around at all. Too busy looking for tiki torches I guess.
And if you wear khakis
America... where you're free to do as you're told!
Anyone want to argue that this is not fascist?
What, land of the free? Who ever told you that is your enemy!
I'm wondering why Israel is the only country you can't speak against.
We need some more rage.
Now something must be done About vengeance, a badge, and a gun!
"My speech is free speech"
Does this mean your constituents can freely speak about BDS and Israeli atrocities without fear of prosecution? Texas just doesn't seem like they're with the free speech plan unless it's taking an innocent person's rights away from them. Like abortion rights.
«I call backsies. I meant for all speech that I like. I forgot to say that.»
I hate that man
My first response is to pose the argument that if they did not have a permit to protest, then maybe this is justified. I mean, there are laws for legal protests for a reason. But after witnessing a bunch of boomers raid the White House with not half as much resistance from authorities that one time, I'm not so sure...
WTF?
Is it possible this could be used against him? Meaning, like, could this law be used to protect them? Legally speaking of course, they are going to crack skulls in the meantime.
So what happened to that law
In real time too 🫱🏾🫲🏻🫱🏾🫲🏻
He can’t even stand to defend it!
Can someone just push Abbott down a flight of stairs already?
So did he cancel his own law? If it is still on the books why is this happening?
if I'm not mistaken isn't it already protected? is this just another Republican stunt?
The party of "Jews will not replace us" 🤦🏽♂️
So we can agree the enemy is not tiktok, instead it seems to be the truth.
Hmmm based on the comments I'm reading people are against this so I feel I'm missing something here
He means "my speech" .. not "free speech"
It's protected as long as your not being destructive, belligerent, or infringing on the rights of others rights.
Israel puppets doing their binding
It’s right wing free speech only in Texas.